CVE-1999-0582: A Windows NT account policy has inappropriate, security-critical settings for lockout, e.g. lockout
A Windows NT account policy has inappropriate, security-critical settings for lockout, e.g. lockout duration, lockout after bad logon attempts, etc.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0582 describes a security vulnerability related to the account lockout policy settings in Windows NT and Windows 2000 systems. Specifically, the vulnerability arises when the account lockout parameters—such as lockout duration, threshold for bad logon attempts, and reset time—are configured inappropriately or insecurely. These settings are critical because they govern how the system responds to repeated failed authentication attempts. If the lockout threshold is set too high or disabled, it allows attackers to perform brute-force or password guessing attacks without triggering account lockouts, thereby increasing the risk of unauthorized access. Conversely, if the lockout duration is excessively long or the threshold is set too low, it can lead to denial-of-service conditions where legitimate users are locked out due to accidental or malicious repeated failed attempts. The vulnerability does not directly compromise confidentiality or integrity but impacts availability by potentially enabling denial-of-service scenarios. The CVSS score of 5 (medium severity) reflects this impact, with an attack vector of network (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no authentication required (Au:N), and no impact on confidentiality or integrity but partial impact on availability (A:P). No patches are available for this vulnerability, and there are no known exploits in the wild, likely due to the age of the affected systems and the nature of the vulnerability being a configuration weakness rather than a software flaw. However, misconfigured account policies remain a relevant security concern in legacy environments or systems still running Windows 2000 or NT.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability lies in the potential for denial-of-service attacks against user accounts, which can disrupt business operations by locking out legitimate users. This can be particularly problematic in environments where Windows 2000 or NT systems are still in use, such as legacy industrial control systems, older financial or governmental infrastructures, or specialized applications that have not been updated. While the vulnerability does not allow direct unauthorized access or data breaches, the availability disruption can lead to operational downtime, reduced productivity, and increased support costs. Additionally, attackers could exploit weak lockout policies to perform brute-force attacks, potentially gaining unauthorized access if other security controls are weak. Given the age of the affected products, most modern European organizations will have migrated away from these systems, but sectors with legacy dependencies remain at risk. The vulnerability also highlights the importance of proper account policy configuration as part of a broader security posture.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no patches are available for this vulnerability, mitigation must focus on proper configuration and compensating controls. Organizations should: 1) Review and enforce strict account lockout policies, setting reasonable thresholds for failed login attempts (e.g., 3-5 attempts) and appropriate lockout durations (e.g., 15-30 minutes) to balance security and usability. 2) Implement monitoring and alerting for repeated failed login attempts to detect potential brute-force attacks early. 3) Where possible, upgrade or migrate legacy Windows NT/2000 systems to supported versions with improved security features. 4) Employ multi-factor authentication (MFA) to reduce reliance on password strength and mitigate brute-force risks. 5) Segment legacy systems from critical network segments to limit exposure. 6) Conduct regular security audits of account policies and authentication mechanisms. 7) Educate administrators on the risks of improper lockout settings and ensure policies are documented and enforced consistently.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Poland, Netherlands
CVE-1999-0582: A Windows NT account policy has inappropriate, security-critical settings for lockout, e.g. lockout
Description
A Windows NT account policy has inappropriate, security-critical settings for lockout, e.g. lockout duration, lockout after bad logon attempts, etc.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0582 describes a security vulnerability related to the account lockout policy settings in Windows NT and Windows 2000 systems. Specifically, the vulnerability arises when the account lockout parameters—such as lockout duration, threshold for bad logon attempts, and reset time—are configured inappropriately or insecurely. These settings are critical because they govern how the system responds to repeated failed authentication attempts. If the lockout threshold is set too high or disabled, it allows attackers to perform brute-force or password guessing attacks without triggering account lockouts, thereby increasing the risk of unauthorized access. Conversely, if the lockout duration is excessively long or the threshold is set too low, it can lead to denial-of-service conditions where legitimate users are locked out due to accidental or malicious repeated failed attempts. The vulnerability does not directly compromise confidentiality or integrity but impacts availability by potentially enabling denial-of-service scenarios. The CVSS score of 5 (medium severity) reflects this impact, with an attack vector of network (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no authentication required (Au:N), and no impact on confidentiality or integrity but partial impact on availability (A:P). No patches are available for this vulnerability, and there are no known exploits in the wild, likely due to the age of the affected systems and the nature of the vulnerability being a configuration weakness rather than a software flaw. However, misconfigured account policies remain a relevant security concern in legacy environments or systems still running Windows 2000 or NT.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability lies in the potential for denial-of-service attacks against user accounts, which can disrupt business operations by locking out legitimate users. This can be particularly problematic in environments where Windows 2000 or NT systems are still in use, such as legacy industrial control systems, older financial or governmental infrastructures, or specialized applications that have not been updated. While the vulnerability does not allow direct unauthorized access or data breaches, the availability disruption can lead to operational downtime, reduced productivity, and increased support costs. Additionally, attackers could exploit weak lockout policies to perform brute-force attacks, potentially gaining unauthorized access if other security controls are weak. Given the age of the affected products, most modern European organizations will have migrated away from these systems, but sectors with legacy dependencies remain at risk. The vulnerability also highlights the importance of proper account policy configuration as part of a broader security posture.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no patches are available for this vulnerability, mitigation must focus on proper configuration and compensating controls. Organizations should: 1) Review and enforce strict account lockout policies, setting reasonable thresholds for failed login attempts (e.g., 3-5 attempts) and appropriate lockout durations (e.g., 15-30 minutes) to balance security and usability. 2) Implement monitoring and alerting for repeated failed login attempts to detect potential brute-force attacks early. 3) Where possible, upgrade or migrate legacy Windows NT/2000 systems to supported versions with improved security features. 4) Employ multi-factor authentication (MFA) to reduce reliance on password strength and mitigate brute-force risks. 5) Segment legacy systems from critical network segments to limit exposure. 6) Conduct regular security audits of account policies and authentication mechanisms. 7) Educate administrators on the risks of improper lockout settings and ensure policies are documented and enforced consistently.
Affected Countries
Threat ID: 682ca32ab6fd31d6ed7de60c
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:38 PM
Last enriched: 7/2/2025, 12:12:54 AM
Last updated: 2/4/2026, 10:24:48 AM
Views: 29
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-41085: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') in Apidog Apidog Web Platform
MediumDetecting and Monitoring OpenClaw (clawdbot, moltbot), (Tue, Feb 3rd)
MediumMalicious Script Delivering More Maliciousness, (Wed, Feb 4th)
MediumEclipse Foundation Mandates Pre-Publish Security Checks for Open VSX Extensions
MediumMicrosoft Warns Python Infostealers Target macOS via Fake Ads and Installers
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.