CVE-1999-0645: Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is sol
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The IRC service is running.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0645 was originally assigned as a candidate vulnerability related to the IRC (Internet Relay Chat) service running on a system. However, this candidate number was rejected and marked as not to be used because the issue described was not a direct security vulnerability but rather a configuration state. The original description indicated that the IRC service was running, which by itself does not constitute a vulnerability but rather a configuration detail that could be relevant in security assessments. The National Vulnerability Database (NVD) clarifies that this candidate is more appropriately covered under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE) framework, which catalogs configuration issues rather than software flaws. There are no affected versions, no patches, no known exploits, and no further technical details available. Essentially, this entry does not represent an exploitable security flaw but a configuration observation that may have security implications depending on context.
Potential Impact
Since CVE-1999-0645 does not describe an actual vulnerability but a configuration state (IRC service running), it does not pose a direct security threat to organizations, including those in Europe. The presence of an IRC service could be considered a potential security risk if it is outdated, misconfigured, or exposed to untrusted networks, as IRC services have historically been abused for command and control or information leakage. However, this CVE entry itself does not provide any exploit or vulnerability details. Therefore, the impact is minimal and indirect, relying on the specific deployment and security posture of the IRC service in question. European organizations would not be directly impacted by this CVE but should maintain good configuration management and network hygiene to mitigate risks associated with running legacy or unnecessary services.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since this is not a direct vulnerability, mitigation focuses on best practices for managing services like IRC. Organizations should: 1) Inventory and audit running services regularly to identify unnecessary or legacy services such as IRC. 2) Disable or remove IRC services if they are not required. 3) If IRC must be used, ensure it is updated to the latest secure versions and properly configured with strong authentication and access controls. 4) Restrict IRC service access via network segmentation and firewall rules to trusted users only. 5) Monitor network traffic for unusual IRC-related activity that could indicate misuse. 6) Incorporate configuration management tools to enforce secure baseline configurations and detect deviations promptly.
Affected Countries
United Kingdom, Germany, France, Netherlands, Sweden
CVE-1999-0645: Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is sol
Description
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The IRC service is running.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0645 was originally assigned as a candidate vulnerability related to the IRC (Internet Relay Chat) service running on a system. However, this candidate number was rejected and marked as not to be used because the issue described was not a direct security vulnerability but rather a configuration state. The original description indicated that the IRC service was running, which by itself does not constitute a vulnerability but rather a configuration detail that could be relevant in security assessments. The National Vulnerability Database (NVD) clarifies that this candidate is more appropriately covered under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE) framework, which catalogs configuration issues rather than software flaws. There are no affected versions, no patches, no known exploits, and no further technical details available. Essentially, this entry does not represent an exploitable security flaw but a configuration observation that may have security implications depending on context.
Potential Impact
Since CVE-1999-0645 does not describe an actual vulnerability but a configuration state (IRC service running), it does not pose a direct security threat to organizations, including those in Europe. The presence of an IRC service could be considered a potential security risk if it is outdated, misconfigured, or exposed to untrusted networks, as IRC services have historically been abused for command and control or information leakage. However, this CVE entry itself does not provide any exploit or vulnerability details. Therefore, the impact is minimal and indirect, relying on the specific deployment and security posture of the IRC service in question. European organizations would not be directly impacted by this CVE but should maintain good configuration management and network hygiene to mitigate risks associated with running legacy or unnecessary services.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since this is not a direct vulnerability, mitigation focuses on best practices for managing services like IRC. Organizations should: 1) Inventory and audit running services regularly to identify unnecessary or legacy services such as IRC. 2) Disable or remove IRC services if they are not required. 3) If IRC must be used, ensure it is updated to the latest secure versions and properly configured with strong authentication and access controls. 4) Restrict IRC service access via network segmentation and firewall rules to trusted users only. 5) Monitor network traffic for unusual IRC-related activity that could indicate misuse. 6) Incorporate configuration management tools to enforce secure baseline configurations and detect deviations promptly.
Affected Countries
Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7ded0c
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 8:26:46 PM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 8:30:09 AM
Views: 31
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-2078: Improper Authorization in yeqifu warehouse
MediumCVE-2026-25533: CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') in agentfront enclave
MediumCVE-2026-25123: CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in homarr-labs homarr
MediumCVE-2026-2074: XML External Entity Reference in O2OA
MediumCVE-2026-2077: Improper Authorization in yeqifu warehouse
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.