CVE-1999-1567: Seapine Software TestTrack server allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service (high CPU) v
Seapine Software TestTrack server allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service (high CPU) via (1) TestTrackWeb.exe and (2) ttcgi.exe by connecting to port 99 and disconnecting without sending any data.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-1567 is a vulnerability affecting the Seapine Software TestTrack server, specifically its components TestTrackWeb.exe and ttcgi.exe. The issue allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition by connecting to the server on port 99 and then disconnecting without sending any data. This behavior triggers high CPU usage on the server, effectively degrading its performance and potentially rendering the service unavailable to legitimate users. The vulnerability does not require authentication or user interaction, and it can be exploited remotely over the network. The CVSS score of 5.0 (medium severity) reflects that the impact is limited to availability, with no impact on confidentiality or integrity. The attack vector is network-based with low complexity and no privileges required. No patches are currently available for this vulnerability, and there are no known exploits in the wild. Given the age of the vulnerability (published in 1999), it likely affects legacy or unmaintained versions of TestTrack software. The vulnerability stems from improper handling of TCP connections on port 99, where the server fails to manage abrupt disconnects gracefully, leading to resource exhaustion (CPU spike).
Potential Impact
For European organizations still running legacy versions of Seapine TestTrack servers, this vulnerability poses a risk of service disruption due to denial of service attacks. The high CPU usage can degrade the performance of the TestTrack server, which is often used for software quality assurance and defect tracking. Disruption of this service could delay development cycles, impact software release schedules, and reduce operational efficiency. While the vulnerability does not compromise data confidentiality or integrity, the availability impact can be significant in environments relying heavily on TestTrack for project management. Additionally, if the TestTrack server is integrated into broader enterprise workflows or continuous integration pipelines, the DoS could have cascading effects. Given the lack of patches, organizations may face challenges in fully mitigating the risk without upgrading or replacing the affected software. The threat is more relevant to organizations that have not migrated away from legacy software or have not implemented network-level protections to restrict access to port 99.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no official patches are available, European organizations should consider the following specific mitigation steps: 1) Restrict network access to the TestTrack server's port 99 using firewalls or network segmentation, allowing only trusted hosts or internal networks to connect. 2) Implement intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) to monitor and block suspicious connection patterns, such as rapid connect/disconnect sequences on port 99. 3) If possible, upgrade to a newer version of TestTrack or migrate to alternative defect tracking solutions that are actively maintained and patched. 4) Monitor server CPU usage and network traffic to detect early signs of exploitation attempts. 5) Employ rate limiting or connection throttling on the server or network devices to reduce the impact of rapid connection attempts. 6) Consider deploying application-layer proxies or gateways that can validate and manage incoming connections to the TestTrack server, filtering out malformed or incomplete connection attempts. These measures will help reduce the attack surface and mitigate the risk of denial of service caused by this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Germany, United Kingdom, France, Netherlands, Sweden
CVE-1999-1567: Seapine Software TestTrack server allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service (high CPU) v
Description
Seapine Software TestTrack server allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service (high CPU) via (1) TestTrackWeb.exe and (2) ttcgi.exe by connecting to port 99 and disconnecting without sending any data.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-1567 is a vulnerability affecting the Seapine Software TestTrack server, specifically its components TestTrackWeb.exe and ttcgi.exe. The issue allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition by connecting to the server on port 99 and then disconnecting without sending any data. This behavior triggers high CPU usage on the server, effectively degrading its performance and potentially rendering the service unavailable to legitimate users. The vulnerability does not require authentication or user interaction, and it can be exploited remotely over the network. The CVSS score of 5.0 (medium severity) reflects that the impact is limited to availability, with no impact on confidentiality or integrity. The attack vector is network-based with low complexity and no privileges required. No patches are currently available for this vulnerability, and there are no known exploits in the wild. Given the age of the vulnerability (published in 1999), it likely affects legacy or unmaintained versions of TestTrack software. The vulnerability stems from improper handling of TCP connections on port 99, where the server fails to manage abrupt disconnects gracefully, leading to resource exhaustion (CPU spike).
Potential Impact
For European organizations still running legacy versions of Seapine TestTrack servers, this vulnerability poses a risk of service disruption due to denial of service attacks. The high CPU usage can degrade the performance of the TestTrack server, which is often used for software quality assurance and defect tracking. Disruption of this service could delay development cycles, impact software release schedules, and reduce operational efficiency. While the vulnerability does not compromise data confidentiality or integrity, the availability impact can be significant in environments relying heavily on TestTrack for project management. Additionally, if the TestTrack server is integrated into broader enterprise workflows or continuous integration pipelines, the DoS could have cascading effects. Given the lack of patches, organizations may face challenges in fully mitigating the risk without upgrading or replacing the affected software. The threat is more relevant to organizations that have not migrated away from legacy software or have not implemented network-level protections to restrict access to port 99.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no official patches are available, European organizations should consider the following specific mitigation steps: 1) Restrict network access to the TestTrack server's port 99 using firewalls or network segmentation, allowing only trusted hosts or internal networks to connect. 2) Implement intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) to monitor and block suspicious connection patterns, such as rapid connect/disconnect sequences on port 99. 3) If possible, upgrade to a newer version of TestTrack or migrate to alternative defect tracking solutions that are actively maintained and patched. 4) Monitor server CPU usage and network traffic to detect early signs of exploitation attempts. 5) Employ rate limiting or connection throttling on the server or network devices to reduce the impact of rapid connection attempts. 6) Consider deploying application-layer proxies or gateways that can validate and manage incoming connections to the TestTrack server, filtering out malformed or incomplete connection attempts. These measures will help reduce the attack surface and mitigate the risk of denial of service caused by this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7deee7
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 7:11:23 PM
Last updated: 2/2/2026, 6:52:53 PM
Views: 34
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-1232: CWE-693 in BeyondTrust Privilege management for Windows
MediumCVE-2025-47402: CWE-126 Buffer Over-read in Qualcomm, Inc. Snapdragon
MediumCVE-2025-47364: CWE-190 Integer Overflow or Wraparound in Qualcomm, Inc. Snapdragon
MediumCVE-2025-47363: CWE-190 Integer Overflow or Wraparound in Qualcomm, Inc. Snapdragon
MediumCVE-2025-15395: CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization in IBM Jazz Foundation
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.