CVE-2000-0275: CRYPTOCard CryptoAdmin for PalmOS uses weak encryption to store a user's PIN number, which allows an
CRYPTOCard CryptoAdmin for PalmOS uses weak encryption to store a user's PIN number, which allows an attacker with access to the .PDB file to generate valid PT-1 tokens after cracking the PIN.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2000-0275 identifies a vulnerability in CRYPTOCard CryptoAdmin version 4.1 for PalmOS devices, where the application uses weak encryption to store a user's PIN number within the .PDB (Palm Database) file. This weak encryption allows an attacker who gains access to the .PDB file to potentially crack the stored PIN. Once the PIN is recovered, the attacker can generate valid PT-1 tokens, which are likely used for authentication or secure access purposes. The vulnerability arises from the insufficient cryptographic protection of sensitive data on the device, making it susceptible to offline attacks if the database file is obtained. The CVSS score of 2.1 (low severity) reflects that exploitation requires local access to the device or its data files, and the impact is limited to confidentiality (partial disclosure of the PIN), with no direct impact on integrity or availability. No patches are available for this vulnerability, and there are no known exploits in the wild. Given the age of the vulnerability (published in 2000) and the specific platform (PalmOS), the threat is largely historical but remains relevant for legacy systems still in operation.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability is generally low due to the niche and outdated nature of the affected platform (PalmOS) and product (CryptoAdmin 4.1). However, organizations that still rely on legacy PalmOS devices for authentication or secure token generation could face risks of unauthorized token generation if an attacker gains physical or file-level access to the device's .PDB files. This could lead to unauthorized access to systems protected by PT-1 tokens, potentially compromising sensitive resources. The confidentiality of user PINs is at risk, but since the vulnerability does not affect integrity or availability, the overall operational impact is limited. The lack of patches and the absence of known exploits suggest a low likelihood of widespread exploitation. Nevertheless, organizations should be aware of this vulnerability if they maintain legacy PalmOS-based authentication infrastructure, especially in sectors with stringent access controls such as finance, government, or critical infrastructure.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given the absence of patches, mitigation should focus on compensating controls and risk reduction strategies. Organizations should: 1) Identify and inventory any legacy PalmOS devices running CryptoAdmin 4.1 to assess exposure. 2) Restrict physical and file system access to these devices to prevent unauthorized extraction of .PDB files. 3) Transition away from PalmOS-based authentication solutions to modern, actively supported multi-factor authentication (MFA) platforms that use strong cryptographic protections. 4) If immediate replacement is not feasible, implement strict device usage policies, including encrypted backups and secure storage of device data. 5) Monitor authentication logs for unusual token generation or access patterns that could indicate misuse. 6) Educate users on the risks of device loss or theft and enforce strong device security practices. These steps will reduce the risk of exploitation despite the lack of a direct patch.
Affected Countries
Germany, United Kingdom, France, Netherlands, Sweden
CVE-2000-0275: CRYPTOCard CryptoAdmin for PalmOS uses weak encryption to store a user's PIN number, which allows an
Description
CRYPTOCard CryptoAdmin for PalmOS uses weak encryption to store a user's PIN number, which allows an attacker with access to the .PDB file to generate valid PT-1 tokens after cracking the PIN.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2000-0275 identifies a vulnerability in CRYPTOCard CryptoAdmin version 4.1 for PalmOS devices, where the application uses weak encryption to store a user's PIN number within the .PDB (Palm Database) file. This weak encryption allows an attacker who gains access to the .PDB file to potentially crack the stored PIN. Once the PIN is recovered, the attacker can generate valid PT-1 tokens, which are likely used for authentication or secure access purposes. The vulnerability arises from the insufficient cryptographic protection of sensitive data on the device, making it susceptible to offline attacks if the database file is obtained. The CVSS score of 2.1 (low severity) reflects that exploitation requires local access to the device or its data files, and the impact is limited to confidentiality (partial disclosure of the PIN), with no direct impact on integrity or availability. No patches are available for this vulnerability, and there are no known exploits in the wild. Given the age of the vulnerability (published in 2000) and the specific platform (PalmOS), the threat is largely historical but remains relevant for legacy systems still in operation.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability is generally low due to the niche and outdated nature of the affected platform (PalmOS) and product (CryptoAdmin 4.1). However, organizations that still rely on legacy PalmOS devices for authentication or secure token generation could face risks of unauthorized token generation if an attacker gains physical or file-level access to the device's .PDB files. This could lead to unauthorized access to systems protected by PT-1 tokens, potentially compromising sensitive resources. The confidentiality of user PINs is at risk, but since the vulnerability does not affect integrity or availability, the overall operational impact is limited. The lack of patches and the absence of known exploits suggest a low likelihood of widespread exploitation. Nevertheless, organizations should be aware of this vulnerability if they maintain legacy PalmOS-based authentication infrastructure, especially in sectors with stringent access controls such as finance, government, or critical infrastructure.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given the absence of patches, mitigation should focus on compensating controls and risk reduction strategies. Organizations should: 1) Identify and inventory any legacy PalmOS devices running CryptoAdmin 4.1 to assess exposure. 2) Restrict physical and file system access to these devices to prevent unauthorized extraction of .PDB files. 3) Transition away from PalmOS-based authentication solutions to modern, actively supported multi-factor authentication (MFA) platforms that use strong cryptographic protections. 4) If immediate replacement is not feasible, implement strict device usage policies, including encrypted backups and secure storage of device data. 5) Monitor authentication logs for unusual token generation or access patterns that could indicate misuse. 6) Educate users on the risks of device loss or theft and enforce strong device security practices. These steps will reduce the risk of exploitation despite the lack of a direct patch.
Affected Countries
Threat ID: 682ca32db6fd31d6ed7df989
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:41 PM
Last enriched: 6/30/2025, 2:11:18 PM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 11:10:15 AM
Views: 45
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-25764: CWE-80: Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) in opf openproject
LowCVE-2026-25729: CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization in lintsinghua DeepAudit
LowCVE-2025-15320: Multiple Binds to the Same Port in Tanium Tanium Client
LowCVE-2026-25724: CWE-61: UNIX Symbolic Link (Symlink) Following in anthropics claude-code
LowCVE-2026-1337: CWE-117 Improper Output Neutralization for Logs in neo4j Enterprise Edition
LowActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.