VulnerabilityPublished 16 Jul 2025Updated 18 Jul 2025

CVE-2025-7357: LITEON IC48A EV Charger · Plaintext Storage of a Password

Affects LITEON IC48A EV ChargerSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.7 High.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

8.7High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 36% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: High
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: High: There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all information within the Vulnerable System being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 16 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
LITEON IC48A EV Charger	Affected =0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

To mitigate this vulnerability, European organizations should immediately verify the firmware versions of their LITEON IC48A and IC80A EV chargers and upgrade to versions 01.00.19r or later for IC48A and 01.01.12e or later for IC80A once available. In the absence of official patches, organizations should restrict network access to the FTP service and system logs to trusted administrators only, employing network segmentation and firewall rules to limit exposure. Monitoring and auditing access to logs should be enhanced to detect unauthorized retrieval of credentials. Organizations should also consider implementing compensating controls such as changing FTP credentials regularly and using strong, unique passwords. Where possible, replacing FTP with more secure protocols (e.g., SFTP or FTPS) is recommended to reduce the risk of credential interception. Additionally, organizations should review and harden logging configurations to avoid storing sensitive information in plaintext. Incident response plans should be updated to include detection and remediation steps for potential exploitation of this vulnerability. Finally, coordination with LITEON and relevant ICS/OT security teams is essential to ensure timely updates and vulnerability management.

Description

LITEON IC48A firmware versions prior to 01.00.19r and LITEON IC80A firmware versions prior to 01.01.12e store FTP-server-access-credentials in cleartext in their system logs.

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a substantial risk to the security of EV charging infrastructure, which is rapidly expanding across the continent as part of green energy and transportation initiatives. Unauthorized access to FTP credentials could allow attackers to manipulate firmware updates, inject malicious code, or exfiltrate sensitive operational data. This could disrupt charging services, cause physical damage to equipment, or enable lateral movement within corporate or utility networks. Given the critical role of EV chargers in supporting electric mobility, exploitation could impact service availability and undermine trust in EV infrastructure. Additionally, compromised chargers could be used as entry points for broader attacks on smart grid systems or critical infrastructure, which are high-value targets in Europe. The exposure of credentials in logs also raises compliance concerns under GDPR and other data protection regulations, as it reflects inadequate security controls over sensitive information. Organizations operating or managing LITEON IC48A or IC80A chargers must consider the risk of targeted attacks, especially in sectors such as utilities, transportation, and public infrastructure.

CWE-256Plaintext Storage of a Password (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighOWASP Top 10 A06:2025: Insecure Design (opens in a new tab)
The product stores a password in plaintext within resources such as memory or files.
Architecture and Design
Avoid storing passwords in easily accessible locations.
Architecture and Design
Consider storing cryptographic hashes of passwords as an alternative to storing in plaintext.
A programmer might attempt to remedy the password management problem by obscuring the password with an encoding function, such as base 64 encoding, but this effort does not adequately protect the password because the encoding can be detected and decoded easily.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Forgot Password (opens in a new tab)
Secure Design Principles (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V2.7.5 (opens in a new tab)
V2.8.5 (opens in a new tab)
V2.8.4 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-25-196-03 (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 24 Jul 2025, 01:01 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-256

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats