CVE-1999-0015: Teardrop IP denial of service.
Teardrop IP denial of service.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0015, commonly known as the Teardrop IP denial of service vulnerability, is a classic network-level attack targeting the IP fragmentation reassembly process in affected operating systems, specifically HP-UX versions ranging from 9.00 through 11.00 and various subversions. The vulnerability arises due to improper handling of overlapping IP fragments. When an attacker sends specially crafted fragmented IP packets with overlapping fragment offsets, the target system's IP stack fails to correctly reassemble these fragments. This leads to system instability or crashes, effectively causing a denial of service (DoS) condition. The attack exploits a fundamental flaw in the IP protocol implementation rather than an application-level vulnerability. The CVSS score of 5 (medium severity) reflects that the attack can be executed remotely without authentication (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N), does not compromise confidentiality or integrity (C:N/I:N), but impacts availability (A:P). Despite its age and the lack of known exploits in the wild currently, the Teardrop attack was historically significant as one of the earliest widespread DoS attacks exploiting IP fragmentation. No patches are available for this vulnerability, likely due to the age of the affected systems and the obsolescence of the vulnerable HP-UX versions. Modern systems have since incorporated fixes or mitigations at the network stack level to prevent such malformed fragment attacks.
Potential Impact
For European organizations still operating legacy HP-UX systems within the affected version range, this vulnerability poses a risk of network-level denial of service. An attacker can remotely disrupt critical services by sending malformed IP fragments, causing system crashes or reboots. This can lead to operational downtime, loss of availability of essential business applications, and potential cascading effects on dependent infrastructure. Although the vulnerability does not allow data theft or system compromise, the availability impact can be significant in environments where HP-UX systems support critical infrastructure, such as telecommunications, manufacturing, or financial services. Given the medium severity and lack of known active exploits, the immediate risk is lower, but organizations running legacy HP-UX should remain vigilant. The threat is less relevant for modern systems but remains a concern for legacy environments that may still be in use in some European sectors.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no official patches are available for this vulnerability, European organizations should focus on compensating controls. These include: 1) Network-level filtering: Deploy intrusion prevention systems (IPS) or firewalls capable of detecting and blocking malformed IP fragments or overlapping fragment attacks to prevent malicious packets from reaching vulnerable HP-UX hosts. 2) Network segmentation: Isolate legacy HP-UX systems from untrusted networks, especially the public internet, to reduce exposure to remote attacks. 3) Traffic monitoring: Implement network traffic analysis to detect unusual patterns indicative of fragmentation attacks. 4) Upgrade or decommission: Plan to upgrade legacy HP-UX systems to supported versions or migrate services to modern platforms with patched network stacks. 5) Incident response readiness: Prepare response plans for potential DoS incidents affecting HP-UX hosts, including rapid isolation and recovery procedures. These targeted mitigations go beyond generic advice by focusing on network-level protections and legacy system management specific to this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Belgium
CVE-1999-0015: Teardrop IP denial of service.
Description
Teardrop IP denial of service.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0015, commonly known as the Teardrop IP denial of service vulnerability, is a classic network-level attack targeting the IP fragmentation reassembly process in affected operating systems, specifically HP-UX versions ranging from 9.00 through 11.00 and various subversions. The vulnerability arises due to improper handling of overlapping IP fragments. When an attacker sends specially crafted fragmented IP packets with overlapping fragment offsets, the target system's IP stack fails to correctly reassemble these fragments. This leads to system instability or crashes, effectively causing a denial of service (DoS) condition. The attack exploits a fundamental flaw in the IP protocol implementation rather than an application-level vulnerability. The CVSS score of 5 (medium severity) reflects that the attack can be executed remotely without authentication (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N), does not compromise confidentiality or integrity (C:N/I:N), but impacts availability (A:P). Despite its age and the lack of known exploits in the wild currently, the Teardrop attack was historically significant as one of the earliest widespread DoS attacks exploiting IP fragmentation. No patches are available for this vulnerability, likely due to the age of the affected systems and the obsolescence of the vulnerable HP-UX versions. Modern systems have since incorporated fixes or mitigations at the network stack level to prevent such malformed fragment attacks.
Potential Impact
For European organizations still operating legacy HP-UX systems within the affected version range, this vulnerability poses a risk of network-level denial of service. An attacker can remotely disrupt critical services by sending malformed IP fragments, causing system crashes or reboots. This can lead to operational downtime, loss of availability of essential business applications, and potential cascading effects on dependent infrastructure. Although the vulnerability does not allow data theft or system compromise, the availability impact can be significant in environments where HP-UX systems support critical infrastructure, such as telecommunications, manufacturing, or financial services. Given the medium severity and lack of known active exploits, the immediate risk is lower, but organizations running legacy HP-UX should remain vigilant. The threat is less relevant for modern systems but remains a concern for legacy environments that may still be in use in some European sectors.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no official patches are available for this vulnerability, European organizations should focus on compensating controls. These include: 1) Network-level filtering: Deploy intrusion prevention systems (IPS) or firewalls capable of detecting and blocking malformed IP fragments or overlapping fragment attacks to prevent malicious packets from reaching vulnerable HP-UX hosts. 2) Network segmentation: Isolate legacy HP-UX systems from untrusted networks, especially the public internet, to reduce exposure to remote attacks. 3) Traffic monitoring: Implement network traffic analysis to detect unusual patterns indicative of fragmentation attacks. 4) Upgrade or decommission: Plan to upgrade legacy HP-UX systems to supported versions or migrate services to modern platforms with patched network stacks. 5) Incident response readiness: Prepare response plans for potential DoS incidents affecting HP-UX hosts, including rapid isolation and recovery procedures. These targeted mitigations go beyond generic advice by focusing on network-level protections and legacy system management specific to this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7de893
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 10:56:22 PM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 11:08:15 AM
Views: 39
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-2083: SQL Injection in code-projects Social Networking Site
MediumCVE-2026-2082: OS Command Injection in D-Link DIR-823X
MediumCVE-2026-2079: Improper Authorization in yeqifu warehouse
MediumCVE-2026-1675: CWE-1188 Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default in brstefanovic Advanced Country Blocker
MediumCVE-2026-1643: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in ariagle MP-Ukagaka
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.