CVE-1999-0042: Buffer overflow in University of Washington's implementation of IMAP and POP servers.
Buffer overflow in University of Washington's implementation of IMAP and POP servers.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0042 is a critical buffer overflow vulnerability found in the University of Washington's implementation of IMAP and POP email servers. These protocols are widely used for retrieving email messages from a mail server. The vulnerability affects multiple versions of the software, including versions 1.0, 2.0, 2.1, 3.0, 3, 4, 4.0, and 4.2.1. A buffer overflow occurs when more data is written to a buffer than it can hold, which can overwrite adjacent memory and lead to arbitrary code execution. This specific vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to exploit the flaw over the network (AV:N) with low attack complexity (AC:L) and no authentication required (Au:N). The impact is severe, compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:C/I:C/A:C) of the affected systems. Given the nature of IMAP and POP servers, exploitation could allow attackers to execute arbitrary code remotely, potentially gaining full control over the mail server, intercept or manipulate email communications, or disrupt mail services. Despite the high severity and critical CVSS score of 10.0, no patches or fixes are available, and no known exploits have been reported in the wild. However, the age of the vulnerability (published in 1997) suggests that modern systems are unlikely to be affected unless legacy software is still in use. The vulnerability highlights the risks of running outdated mail server software and the importance of timely patching or migration to supported solutions.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability could be significant if legacy University of Washington IMAP/POP servers are still operational. Compromise of mail servers can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive communications, data leakage, and disruption of email services critical for business operations. Confidentiality breaches could expose personal data protected under GDPR, leading to regulatory penalties and reputational damage. Integrity violations may allow attackers to alter email content or inject malicious payloads, facilitating further attacks such as phishing or malware distribution. Availability impacts could disrupt communication channels, affecting productivity and incident response capabilities. Although modern mail infrastructure typically uses updated software, some institutions or smaller organizations might still rely on legacy systems, increasing their risk. Additionally, the lack of available patches means that vulnerable systems remain exposed unless replaced or mitigated by other means. The threat is exacerbated by the fact that exploitation requires no authentication and can be performed remotely, making it accessible to a wide range of attackers.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given the absence of official patches, European organizations should prioritize the following mitigations: 1) Immediate identification and inventory of mail servers running University of Washington IMAP/POP implementations, especially legacy versions listed as affected. 2) Decommission or upgrade these servers to modern, supported mail server software that receives regular security updates. 3) If immediate replacement is not feasible, implement network-level protections such as firewall rules to restrict access to IMAP/POP ports (typically 143, 110) only to trusted IP addresses or internal networks. 4) Employ intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) with signatures or anomaly detection to monitor for suspicious activity targeting these services. 5) Use network segmentation to isolate mail servers from critical infrastructure to limit lateral movement in case of compromise. 6) Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to detect potential exploitation attempts. 7) Educate IT staff about the risks of legacy software and the importance of timely upgrades. 8) Consider deploying application-layer gateways or proxies that can filter or sanitize traffic to vulnerable services. These steps will reduce the attack surface and mitigate the risk until full migration away from vulnerable software is achieved.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Poland, Belgium, Sweden, Austria
CVE-1999-0042: Buffer overflow in University of Washington's implementation of IMAP and POP servers.
Description
Buffer overflow in University of Washington's implementation of IMAP and POP servers.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0042 is a critical buffer overflow vulnerability found in the University of Washington's implementation of IMAP and POP email servers. These protocols are widely used for retrieving email messages from a mail server. The vulnerability affects multiple versions of the software, including versions 1.0, 2.0, 2.1, 3.0, 3, 4, 4.0, and 4.2.1. A buffer overflow occurs when more data is written to a buffer than it can hold, which can overwrite adjacent memory and lead to arbitrary code execution. This specific vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to exploit the flaw over the network (AV:N) with low attack complexity (AC:L) and no authentication required (Au:N). The impact is severe, compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:C/I:C/A:C) of the affected systems. Given the nature of IMAP and POP servers, exploitation could allow attackers to execute arbitrary code remotely, potentially gaining full control over the mail server, intercept or manipulate email communications, or disrupt mail services. Despite the high severity and critical CVSS score of 10.0, no patches or fixes are available, and no known exploits have been reported in the wild. However, the age of the vulnerability (published in 1997) suggests that modern systems are unlikely to be affected unless legacy software is still in use. The vulnerability highlights the risks of running outdated mail server software and the importance of timely patching or migration to supported solutions.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability could be significant if legacy University of Washington IMAP/POP servers are still operational. Compromise of mail servers can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive communications, data leakage, and disruption of email services critical for business operations. Confidentiality breaches could expose personal data protected under GDPR, leading to regulatory penalties and reputational damage. Integrity violations may allow attackers to alter email content or inject malicious payloads, facilitating further attacks such as phishing or malware distribution. Availability impacts could disrupt communication channels, affecting productivity and incident response capabilities. Although modern mail infrastructure typically uses updated software, some institutions or smaller organizations might still rely on legacy systems, increasing their risk. Additionally, the lack of available patches means that vulnerable systems remain exposed unless replaced or mitigated by other means. The threat is exacerbated by the fact that exploitation requires no authentication and can be performed remotely, making it accessible to a wide range of attackers.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given the absence of official patches, European organizations should prioritize the following mitigations: 1) Immediate identification and inventory of mail servers running University of Washington IMAP/POP implementations, especially legacy versions listed as affected. 2) Decommission or upgrade these servers to modern, supported mail server software that receives regular security updates. 3) If immediate replacement is not feasible, implement network-level protections such as firewall rules to restrict access to IMAP/POP ports (typically 143, 110) only to trusted IP addresses or internal networks. 4) Employ intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) with signatures or anomaly detection to monitor for suspicious activity targeting these services. 5) Use network segmentation to isolate mail servers from critical infrastructure to limit lateral movement in case of compromise. 6) Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to detect potential exploitation attempts. 7) Educate IT staff about the risks of legacy software and the importance of timely upgrades. 8) Consider deploying application-layer gateways or proxies that can filter or sanitize traffic to vulnerable services. These steps will reduce the attack surface and mitigate the risk until full migration away from vulnerable software is achieved.
Threat ID: 682ca32ab6fd31d6ed7de688
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:38 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 11:25:03 AM
Last updated: 2/3/2026, 2:58:50 PM
Views: 27
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-25036: Missing Authorization in WP Chill Passster
HighCVE-2026-25028: Missing Authorization in Element Invader ElementInvader Addons for Elementor
HighCVE-2026-25027: Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') in ThemeMove Unicamp
HighCVE-2026-25024: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Blair Williams ThirstyAffiliates
HighCVE-2026-25023: Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere in mdedev Run Contests, Raffles, and Giveaways with ContestsWP
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.