CVE-1999-0168: The portmapper may act as a proxy and redirect service requests from an attacker, making the request
The portmapper may act as a proxy and redirect service requests from an attacker, making the request appear to come from the local host, possibly bypassing authentication that would otherwise have taken place. For example, NFS file systems could be mounted through the portmapper despite export restrictions.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0168 is a high-severity vulnerability affecting the portmapper service on SunOS versions 4.1.3 and 4.1.3c. The portmapper is a critical component in UNIX-like systems that maps RPC (Remote Procedure Call) program numbers to network port numbers, enabling clients to locate services on a host. This vulnerability allows the portmapper to act as a proxy, redirecting service requests from an attacker such that the requests appear to originate from the local host. This spoofing of the request source can bypass authentication mechanisms that rely on the origin of the request, such as host-based access controls. A notable example is the Network File System (NFS), where export restrictions are typically enforced to restrict mounting of file systems to trusted hosts. By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker can mount NFS file systems despite these restrictions, potentially gaining unauthorized access to sensitive data. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 7.5 (high), reflecting its network attack vector, low attack complexity, no authentication required, and partial impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Although this vulnerability dates back to 1992 and affects legacy SunOS systems, it highlights the risks of trusting network source information and the importance of robust authentication mechanisms. No patches are available, and no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, but the inherent design flaw remains a significant security concern in affected environments.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends largely on the presence of legacy SunOS 4.1.3 or 4.1.3c systems running portmapper and NFS services. If such systems are still in use, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to bypass network-based access controls and gain unauthorized access to sensitive file systems. This could lead to data breaches, unauthorized data modification, or disruption of services relying on NFS mounts. Given the high CVSS score and the ability to bypass authentication, the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of critical data could be compromised. In sectors such as government, finance, research, and critical infrastructure—where legacy UNIX systems may still be operational—this vulnerability could facilitate lateral movement within networks or data exfiltration. Additionally, the vulnerability could be leveraged in multi-stage attacks targeting European organizations with legacy infrastructure, increasing the risk of broader compromise. However, the overall impact is mitigated by the age of the affected systems and the lack of known exploits, but organizations should still assess their environments for legacy systems to avoid exposure.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given that no patches are available for this vulnerability, European organizations should focus on compensating controls and environment hardening. Specific recommendations include: 1) Identify and inventory all legacy SunOS 4.1.3 and 4.1.3c systems running portmapper and NFS services. 2) Decommission or upgrade these legacy systems to supported, patched operating systems that do not exhibit this vulnerability. 3) If immediate upgrade is not feasible, restrict network access to portmapper and NFS services using network segmentation and firewall rules, limiting access only to trusted hosts and networks. 4) Employ strong authentication and encryption mechanisms where possible, such as using Kerberos for NFS authentication, to reduce reliance on IP-based access controls. 5) Monitor network traffic for unusual portmapper or NFS activity that could indicate exploitation attempts. 6) Educate system administrators about the risks of legacy RPC services and the importance of minimizing exposure. 7) Consider disabling portmapper services entirely if not required, or replacing RPC-based services with more secure alternatives. These targeted mitigations go beyond generic advice by focusing on legacy system management, network controls, and authentication enhancements specific to the nature of this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Sweden
CVE-1999-0168: The portmapper may act as a proxy and redirect service requests from an attacker, making the request
Description
The portmapper may act as a proxy and redirect service requests from an attacker, making the request appear to come from the local host, possibly bypassing authentication that would otherwise have taken place. For example, NFS file systems could be mounted through the portmapper despite export restrictions.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0168 is a high-severity vulnerability affecting the portmapper service on SunOS versions 4.1.3 and 4.1.3c. The portmapper is a critical component in UNIX-like systems that maps RPC (Remote Procedure Call) program numbers to network port numbers, enabling clients to locate services on a host. This vulnerability allows the portmapper to act as a proxy, redirecting service requests from an attacker such that the requests appear to originate from the local host. This spoofing of the request source can bypass authentication mechanisms that rely on the origin of the request, such as host-based access controls. A notable example is the Network File System (NFS), where export restrictions are typically enforced to restrict mounting of file systems to trusted hosts. By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker can mount NFS file systems despite these restrictions, potentially gaining unauthorized access to sensitive data. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 7.5 (high), reflecting its network attack vector, low attack complexity, no authentication required, and partial impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Although this vulnerability dates back to 1992 and affects legacy SunOS systems, it highlights the risks of trusting network source information and the importance of robust authentication mechanisms. No patches are available, and no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, but the inherent design flaw remains a significant security concern in affected environments.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends largely on the presence of legacy SunOS 4.1.3 or 4.1.3c systems running portmapper and NFS services. If such systems are still in use, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to bypass network-based access controls and gain unauthorized access to sensitive file systems. This could lead to data breaches, unauthorized data modification, or disruption of services relying on NFS mounts. Given the high CVSS score and the ability to bypass authentication, the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of critical data could be compromised. In sectors such as government, finance, research, and critical infrastructure—where legacy UNIX systems may still be operational—this vulnerability could facilitate lateral movement within networks or data exfiltration. Additionally, the vulnerability could be leveraged in multi-stage attacks targeting European organizations with legacy infrastructure, increasing the risk of broader compromise. However, the overall impact is mitigated by the age of the affected systems and the lack of known exploits, but organizations should still assess their environments for legacy systems to avoid exposure.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given that no patches are available for this vulnerability, European organizations should focus on compensating controls and environment hardening. Specific recommendations include: 1) Identify and inventory all legacy SunOS 4.1.3 and 4.1.3c systems running portmapper and NFS services. 2) Decommission or upgrade these legacy systems to supported, patched operating systems that do not exhibit this vulnerability. 3) If immediate upgrade is not feasible, restrict network access to portmapper and NFS services using network segmentation and firewall rules, limiting access only to trusted hosts and networks. 4) Employ strong authentication and encryption mechanisms where possible, such as using Kerberos for NFS authentication, to reduce reliance on IP-based access controls. 5) Monitor network traffic for unusual portmapper or NFS activity that could indicate exploitation attempts. 6) Educate system administrators about the risks of legacy RPC services and the importance of minimizing exposure. 7) Consider disabling portmapper services entirely if not required, or replacing RPC-based services with more secure alternatives. These targeted mitigations go beyond generic advice by focusing on legacy system management, network controls, and authentication enhancements specific to the nature of this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Threat ID: 682ca32ab6fd31d6ed7de3c7
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:38 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 5:43:29 PM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 8:59:22 AM
Views: 32
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-68621: CWE-208: Observable Timing Discrepancy in TriliumNext Trilium
HighCVE-2026-2071: Buffer Overflow in UTT 进取 520W
HighCVE-2026-25762: CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in adonisjs core
HighCVE-2026-25754: CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') in adonisjs core
HighCVE-2026-25644: CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation in datahub-project datahub
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.