CVE-1999-0181: The wall daemon can be used for denial of service, social engineering attacks, or to execute remote
The wall daemon can be used for denial of service, social engineering attacks, or to execute remote commands.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0181 is a vulnerability associated with the rpc.walld daemon, a legacy Unix service responsible for broadcasting messages to logged-in users via the 'wall' command. This daemon can be exploited to perform denial of service (DoS) attacks, social engineering attacks, or potentially execute remote commands. The vulnerability arises because the daemon accepts remote requests without proper authentication or input validation, allowing an attacker to send crafted messages or commands that disrupt normal system operation or deceive users. The CVSS score of 6.8 (medium severity) reflects the network attack vector (AV:N), requiring no authentication (Au:N), moderate attack complexity (AC:M), and impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:P/I:P/A:P). Although no patches are available and no known exploits are currently in the wild, the vulnerability remains relevant in environments where legacy Unix systems or rpc.walld are still in use. Exploitation could lead to system instability, unauthorized command execution, or manipulation of user perception through social engineering messages, potentially facilitating further attacks.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends largely on the presence of legacy Unix systems running rpc.walld. Exploitation could cause denial of service, disrupting critical services or internal communications. Social engineering attacks leveraging this vulnerability could mislead employees, potentially leading to credential theft or unauthorized access. Remote command execution, if achievable, could compromise system integrity and confidentiality, leading to data breaches or lateral movement within networks. Although modern systems rarely use rpc.walld, some industrial control systems, research institutions, or legacy infrastructure in Europe might still be vulnerable, posing risks to operational continuity and data security.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given the absence of patches, mitigation should focus on reducing exposure and risk. Organizations should audit their networks to identify any systems running rpc.walld and assess their necessity. If found, disable or remove the rpc.walld service to eliminate the attack surface. Network segmentation and firewall rules should block incoming traffic to the rpc.walld port (typically port 32786/tcp) from untrusted sources. Monitoring and alerting on unusual network activity targeting rpc.walld can help detect attempted exploitation. Additionally, educating users about social engineering risks can reduce the effectiveness of deceptive messages. For legacy systems that must remain operational, consider isolating them in secure network zones and applying strict access controls.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands
CVE-1999-0181: The wall daemon can be used for denial of service, social engineering attacks, or to execute remote
Description
The wall daemon can be used for denial of service, social engineering attacks, or to execute remote commands.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0181 is a vulnerability associated with the rpc.walld daemon, a legacy Unix service responsible for broadcasting messages to logged-in users via the 'wall' command. This daemon can be exploited to perform denial of service (DoS) attacks, social engineering attacks, or potentially execute remote commands. The vulnerability arises because the daemon accepts remote requests without proper authentication or input validation, allowing an attacker to send crafted messages or commands that disrupt normal system operation or deceive users. The CVSS score of 6.8 (medium severity) reflects the network attack vector (AV:N), requiring no authentication (Au:N), moderate attack complexity (AC:M), and impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:P/I:P/A:P). Although no patches are available and no known exploits are currently in the wild, the vulnerability remains relevant in environments where legacy Unix systems or rpc.walld are still in use. Exploitation could lead to system instability, unauthorized command execution, or manipulation of user perception through social engineering messages, potentially facilitating further attacks.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends largely on the presence of legacy Unix systems running rpc.walld. Exploitation could cause denial of service, disrupting critical services or internal communications. Social engineering attacks leveraging this vulnerability could mislead employees, potentially leading to credential theft or unauthorized access. Remote command execution, if achievable, could compromise system integrity and confidentiality, leading to data breaches or lateral movement within networks. Although modern systems rarely use rpc.walld, some industrial control systems, research institutions, or legacy infrastructure in Europe might still be vulnerable, posing risks to operational continuity and data security.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given the absence of patches, mitigation should focus on reducing exposure and risk. Organizations should audit their networks to identify any systems running rpc.walld and assess their necessity. If found, disable or remove the rpc.walld service to eliminate the attack surface. Network segmentation and firewall rules should block incoming traffic to the rpc.walld port (typically port 32786/tcp) from untrusted sources. Monitoring and alerting on unusual network activity targeting rpc.walld can help detect attempted exploitation. Additionally, educating users about social engineering risks can reduce the effectiveness of deceptive messages. For legacy systems that must remain operational, consider isolating them in secure network zones and applying strict access controls.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Threat ID: 682ca32ab6fd31d6ed7de407
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:38 PM
Last enriched: 7/2/2025, 2:55:43 AM
Last updated: 8/1/2025, 1:39:12 AM
Views: 10
Related Threats
CVE-2025-9090: Command Injection in Tenda AC20
MediumCVE-2025-8878: CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') in properfraction Paid Membership Plugin, Ecommerce, User Registration Form, Login Form, User Profile & Restrict Content – ProfilePress
MediumCVE-2025-8143: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in pencidesign Soledad
MediumCVE-2025-8719: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in reubenthiessen Translate This gTranslate Shortcode
MediumCVE-2025-8464: CWE-23 Relative Path Traversal in glenwpcoder Drag and Drop Multiple File Upload for Contact Form 7
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.