Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-1999-0257: Nestea variation of teardrop IP fragmentation denial of service.

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-1999-0257cve-1999-0257denial of service
Published: Wed Apr 01 1998 (04/01/1998, 05:00:00 UTC)
Source: NVD
Vendor/Project: linux
Product: linux_kernel

Description

Nestea variation of teardrop IP fragmentation denial of service.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 07/01/2025, 22:27:28 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-1999-0257 refers to a vulnerability known as the Nestea variation of the teardrop IP fragmentation denial of service (DoS) attack. This vulnerability affects the Linux kernel, specifically version 2.6.20.1 as noted. The teardrop attack exploits weaknesses in the IP fragmentation reassembly process. IP packets that are fragmented are reassembled by the target system based on offset values. The Nestea variant sends specially crafted fragmented IP packets with overlapping fragment offsets, causing the target system's kernel to crash or become unstable when it attempts to reassemble these packets. This results in a denial of service condition, where the affected system is unable to process legitimate network traffic or may crash entirely. The vulnerability does not impact confidentiality or integrity but solely affects availability. The CVSS score of 5 (medium severity) reflects that this is a network-based attack (AV:N), with low attack complexity (AC:L), no authentication required (Au:N), no impact on confidentiality or integrity (C:N/I:N), but causes partial availability disruption (A:P). There is no patch available for this specific kernel version, and no known exploits are currently active in the wild. Given the age of this vulnerability (published in 1998) and the affected kernel version, modern Linux systems are unlikely to be vulnerable unless running legacy or embedded systems with this exact kernel version. However, the underlying concept of IP fragmentation attacks remains relevant in network security.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability would be service disruption due to denial of service conditions on affected Linux systems running the vulnerable kernel version. This could affect network infrastructure devices, servers, or embedded systems that have not been updated or patched. While modern Linux distributions have long since addressed this issue, legacy systems in critical infrastructure, industrial control systems, or specialized environments might still be at risk. A successful attack could lead to temporary loss of availability of affected systems, impacting business operations, network services, or critical applications. Since the attack requires no authentication and can be launched remotely over the network, it poses a risk of external attackers causing disruption. However, the lack of known exploits in the wild and the age of the vulnerability reduce the likelihood of widespread impact. Organizations relying on up-to-date Linux kernels are not at risk from this specific CVE, but the general threat of IP fragmentation-based DoS attacks remains a consideration in network security design.

Mitigation Recommendations

Given that no patch is available for the specific vulnerable kernel version, the most effective mitigation is to upgrade to a modern, supported Linux kernel version where this vulnerability has been addressed. For legacy systems where upgrading is not feasible, network-level mitigations should be implemented. These include configuring firewalls and intrusion prevention systems (IPS) to detect and block malformed or overlapping IP fragments characteristic of teardrop/Nestea attacks. Network devices should be configured to drop suspicious fragmented packets or limit the rate of fragmented packets to reduce attack surface. Additionally, employing network segmentation to isolate vulnerable systems and monitoring network traffic for unusual fragmentation patterns can help detect and prevent exploitation attempts. Regular vulnerability assessments and audits should be conducted to identify any systems running outdated kernels. Finally, organizations should maintain up-to-date incident response plans to quickly address any denial of service incidents.

Need more detailed analysis?Upgrade to Pro Console

Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7de93e

Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM

Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 10:27:28 PM

Last updated: 2/7/2026, 9:03:14 AM

Views: 53

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats