CVE-1999-0438: Remote attackers can perform a denial of service in WebRamp systems by sending a malicious UDP packe
Remote attackers can perform a denial of service in WebRamp systems by sending a malicious UDP packet to port 5353, changing its IP address.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0438 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting the WebRamp 200i system version 1.0, a product developed by Ramp Networks. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (DoS) by sending a specially crafted malicious UDP packet to port 5353. This packet manipulates the system's IP address handling, leading to service disruption. The attack vector is network-based (AV:N), requires no authentication (Au:N), and has low attack complexity (AC:L). The impact is limited to availability (A:P), with no direct confidentiality or integrity compromise. Since the vulnerability dates back to 1999 and no patches are available, the affected systems remain vulnerable if still in use. The lack of known exploits in the wild suggests limited active exploitation, but the potential for disruption remains if attackers target these legacy systems. The vulnerability exploits the mDNS/Multicast DNS port (5353), which is commonly used for local network service discovery, indicating that the WebRamp 200i may be improperly handling or exposing this service to external networks, increasing risk. Given the age of the product and vulnerability, it is likely found in legacy or specialized network environments rather than mainstream deployments.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability is the potential for denial of service attacks against network infrastructure components running WebRamp 200i systems. This could disrupt network services, leading to downtime and operational interruptions, especially in environments relying on these devices for critical network functions. While the vulnerability does not compromise data confidentiality or integrity, availability loss can affect business continuity, particularly in sectors where uptime is critical such as telecommunications, industrial control systems, or government networks. The absence of patches means organizations must rely on compensating controls. Given the niche nature of the product, the impact is likely limited to organizations still operating legacy Ramp Networks equipment, which may be more common in certain specialized or older network environments within Europe.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no patches are available for this vulnerability, European organizations should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Isolate WebRamp 200i devices from untrusted networks, especially the internet, to prevent exposure of UDP port 5353 to external attackers. 2) Employ network segmentation and strict firewall rules to restrict access to port 5353 only to trusted internal hosts. 3) Monitor network traffic for unusual or malformed UDP packets targeting port 5353 to detect potential exploitation attempts. 4) Consider replacing or upgrading legacy WebRamp 200i systems with modern, supported network equipment that does not have known vulnerabilities. 5) Implement intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) with signatures or anomaly detection for malformed mDNS traffic. 6) Conduct regular network audits to identify and document any remaining legacy Ramp Networks devices to prioritize remediation or isolation.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands
CVE-1999-0438: Remote attackers can perform a denial of service in WebRamp systems by sending a malicious UDP packe
Description
Remote attackers can perform a denial of service in WebRamp systems by sending a malicious UDP packet to port 5353, changing its IP address.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0438 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting the WebRamp 200i system version 1.0, a product developed by Ramp Networks. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (DoS) by sending a specially crafted malicious UDP packet to port 5353. This packet manipulates the system's IP address handling, leading to service disruption. The attack vector is network-based (AV:N), requires no authentication (Au:N), and has low attack complexity (AC:L). The impact is limited to availability (A:P), with no direct confidentiality or integrity compromise. Since the vulnerability dates back to 1999 and no patches are available, the affected systems remain vulnerable if still in use. The lack of known exploits in the wild suggests limited active exploitation, but the potential for disruption remains if attackers target these legacy systems. The vulnerability exploits the mDNS/Multicast DNS port (5353), which is commonly used for local network service discovery, indicating that the WebRamp 200i may be improperly handling or exposing this service to external networks, increasing risk. Given the age of the product and vulnerability, it is likely found in legacy or specialized network environments rather than mainstream deployments.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability is the potential for denial of service attacks against network infrastructure components running WebRamp 200i systems. This could disrupt network services, leading to downtime and operational interruptions, especially in environments relying on these devices for critical network functions. While the vulnerability does not compromise data confidentiality or integrity, availability loss can affect business continuity, particularly in sectors where uptime is critical such as telecommunications, industrial control systems, or government networks. The absence of patches means organizations must rely on compensating controls. Given the niche nature of the product, the impact is likely limited to organizations still operating legacy Ramp Networks equipment, which may be more common in certain specialized or older network environments within Europe.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no patches are available for this vulnerability, European organizations should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Isolate WebRamp 200i devices from untrusted networks, especially the internet, to prevent exposure of UDP port 5353 to external attackers. 2) Employ network segmentation and strict firewall rules to restrict access to port 5353 only to trusted internal hosts. 3) Monitor network traffic for unusual or malformed UDP packets targeting port 5353 to detect potential exploitation attempts. 4) Consider replacing or upgrading legacy WebRamp 200i systems with modern, supported network equipment that does not have known vulnerabilities. 5) Implement intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) with signatures or anomaly detection for malformed mDNS traffic. 6) Conduct regular network audits to identify and document any remaining legacy Ramp Networks devices to prioritize remediation or isolation.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7deebe
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 7:13:32 PM
Last updated: 8/1/2025, 3:43:00 AM
Views: 11
Related Threats
CVE-2025-9090: Command Injection in Tenda AC20
MediumCVE-2025-8878: CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') in properfraction Paid Membership Plugin, Ecommerce, User Registration Form, Login Form, User Profile & Restrict Content – ProfilePress
MediumCVE-2025-8143: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in pencidesign Soledad
MediumCVE-2025-8719: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in reubenthiessen Translate This gTranslate Shortcode
MediumCVE-2025-8464: CWE-23 Relative Path Traversal in glenwpcoder Drag and Drop Multiple File Upload for Contact Form 7
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.