CVE-1999-0444: Remote attackers can perform a denial of service in Windows machines using malicious ARP packets, fo
Remote attackers can perform a denial of service in Windows machines using malicious ARP packets, forcing a message box display for each packet or filling up log files.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0444 is a vulnerability affecting Microsoft Windows 95 systems, where remote attackers can exploit the handling of Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) packets to cause a denial of service (DoS). Specifically, malicious ARP packets sent to a vulnerable Windows 95 machine can trigger the display of a message box for each packet received or cause the system to fill up log files excessively. This behavior can overwhelm the user interface or exhaust system resources, effectively rendering the system unusable or severely degraded in performance. The vulnerability does not impact confidentiality or integrity but directly affects system availability. The attack vector is network-based (AV:N), requires no authentication (Au:N), and has low attack complexity (AC:L). Since Windows 95 is an outdated operating system, no patches are available, and the vulnerability remains unmitigated in legacy environments. Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the vulnerability's nature allows for straightforward exploitation by sending crafted ARP packets to targeted machines on the same network segment or reachable via routing.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability is generally low in modern contexts due to the obsolescence of Windows 95 systems. However, legacy systems running Windows 95 might still be in use in some industrial control environments, embedded systems, or specialized legacy applications. In such cases, exploitation could lead to denial of service conditions, disrupting business operations, causing downtime, and potentially impacting critical infrastructure if these legacy systems are part of operational technology networks. The denial of service could also result in increased support costs and operational delays. Since the vulnerability does not compromise data confidentiality or integrity, the primary concern is availability disruption. Organizations relying on legacy Windows 95 systems should be particularly cautious in network segments exposed to untrusted users or external networks.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given the absence of patches for this vulnerability, mitigation must focus on network-level controls and system isolation. European organizations should: 1) Identify and inventory any legacy Windows 95 systems still in operation. 2) Isolate these systems from untrusted networks, especially the internet, using network segmentation and firewalls to block unsolicited ARP traffic from external sources. 3) Employ network monitoring tools to detect abnormal ARP traffic patterns indicative of an attack. 4) Where possible, replace or upgrade legacy Windows 95 systems to supported operating systems that receive security updates. 5) Implement strict access controls and limit physical and network access to legacy systems. 6) Use intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) configured to detect and block malformed or excessive ARP packets. These steps help reduce the attack surface and prevent exploitation despite the lack of direct patches.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Poland, Netherlands
CVE-1999-0444: Remote attackers can perform a denial of service in Windows machines using malicious ARP packets, fo
Description
Remote attackers can perform a denial of service in Windows machines using malicious ARP packets, forcing a message box display for each packet or filling up log files.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0444 is a vulnerability affecting Microsoft Windows 95 systems, where remote attackers can exploit the handling of Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) packets to cause a denial of service (DoS). Specifically, malicious ARP packets sent to a vulnerable Windows 95 machine can trigger the display of a message box for each packet received or cause the system to fill up log files excessively. This behavior can overwhelm the user interface or exhaust system resources, effectively rendering the system unusable or severely degraded in performance. The vulnerability does not impact confidentiality or integrity but directly affects system availability. The attack vector is network-based (AV:N), requires no authentication (Au:N), and has low attack complexity (AC:L). Since Windows 95 is an outdated operating system, no patches are available, and the vulnerability remains unmitigated in legacy environments. Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the vulnerability's nature allows for straightforward exploitation by sending crafted ARP packets to targeted machines on the same network segment or reachable via routing.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability is generally low in modern contexts due to the obsolescence of Windows 95 systems. However, legacy systems running Windows 95 might still be in use in some industrial control environments, embedded systems, or specialized legacy applications. In such cases, exploitation could lead to denial of service conditions, disrupting business operations, causing downtime, and potentially impacting critical infrastructure if these legacy systems are part of operational technology networks. The denial of service could also result in increased support costs and operational delays. Since the vulnerability does not compromise data confidentiality or integrity, the primary concern is availability disruption. Organizations relying on legacy Windows 95 systems should be particularly cautious in network segments exposed to untrusted users or external networks.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given the absence of patches for this vulnerability, mitigation must focus on network-level controls and system isolation. European organizations should: 1) Identify and inventory any legacy Windows 95 systems still in operation. 2) Isolate these systems from untrusted networks, especially the internet, using network segmentation and firewalls to block unsolicited ARP traffic from external sources. 3) Employ network monitoring tools to detect abnormal ARP traffic patterns indicative of an attack. 4) Where possible, replace or upgrade legacy Windows 95 systems to supported operating systems that receive security updates. 5) Implement strict access controls and limit physical and network access to legacy systems. 6) Use intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) configured to detect and block malformed or excessive ARP packets. These steps help reduce the attack surface and prevent exploitation despite the lack of direct patches.
Affected Countries
Threat ID: 682ca32cb6fd31d6ed7def7a
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:40 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 6:27:26 PM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 9:18:13 AM
Views: 31
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-2079: Improper Authorization in yeqifu warehouse
MediumCVE-2026-1675: CWE-1188 Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default in brstefanovic Advanced Country Blocker
MediumCVE-2026-1643: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in ariagle MP-Ukagaka
MediumCVE-2026-1634: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in alexdtn Subitem AL Slider
MediumCVE-2026-1613: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in mrlister1 Wonka Slide
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.