Skip to main content

CVE-1999-0444: Remote attackers can perform a denial of service in Windows machines using malicious ARP packets, fo

Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-1999-0444cve-1999-0444denial of service
Published: Mon Apr 12 1999 (04/12/1999, 04:00:00 UTC)
Source: NVD
Vendor/Project: microsoft
Product: windows_95

Description

Remote attackers can perform a denial of service in Windows machines using malicious ARP packets, forcing a message box display for each packet or filling up log files.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 07/01/2025, 18:27:26 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-1999-0444 is a vulnerability affecting Microsoft Windows 95 systems, where remote attackers can exploit the handling of Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) packets to cause a denial of service (DoS). Specifically, malicious ARP packets sent to a vulnerable Windows 95 machine can trigger the display of a message box for each packet received or cause the system to fill up log files excessively. This behavior can overwhelm the user interface or exhaust system resources, effectively rendering the system unusable or severely degraded in performance. The vulnerability does not impact confidentiality or integrity but directly affects system availability. The attack vector is network-based (AV:N), requires no authentication (Au:N), and has low attack complexity (AC:L). Since Windows 95 is an outdated operating system, no patches are available, and the vulnerability remains unmitigated in legacy environments. Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the vulnerability's nature allows for straightforward exploitation by sending crafted ARP packets to targeted machines on the same network segment or reachable via routing.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability is generally low in modern contexts due to the obsolescence of Windows 95 systems. However, legacy systems running Windows 95 might still be in use in some industrial control environments, embedded systems, or specialized legacy applications. In such cases, exploitation could lead to denial of service conditions, disrupting business operations, causing downtime, and potentially impacting critical infrastructure if these legacy systems are part of operational technology networks. The denial of service could also result in increased support costs and operational delays. Since the vulnerability does not compromise data confidentiality or integrity, the primary concern is availability disruption. Organizations relying on legacy Windows 95 systems should be particularly cautious in network segments exposed to untrusted users or external networks.

Mitigation Recommendations

Given the absence of patches for this vulnerability, mitigation must focus on network-level controls and system isolation. European organizations should: 1) Identify and inventory any legacy Windows 95 systems still in operation. 2) Isolate these systems from untrusted networks, especially the internet, using network segmentation and firewalls to block unsolicited ARP traffic from external sources. 3) Employ network monitoring tools to detect abnormal ARP traffic patterns indicative of an attack. 4) Where possible, replace or upgrade legacy Windows 95 systems to supported operating systems that receive security updates. 5) Implement strict access controls and limit physical and network access to legacy systems. 6) Use intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) configured to detect and block malformed or excessive ARP packets. These steps help reduce the attack surface and prevent exploitation despite the lack of direct patches.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Threat ID: 682ca32cb6fd31d6ed7def7a

Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:40 PM

Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 6:27:26 PM

Last updated: 7/26/2025, 11:50:04 PM

Views: 12

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats