CVE-1999-0514: UDP messages to broadcast addresses are allowed, allowing for a Fraggle attack that can cause a deni
UDP messages to broadcast addresses are allowed, allowing for a Fraggle attack that can cause a denial of service by flooding the target.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0514 describes a network vulnerability where UDP messages sent to broadcast addresses are permitted, enabling a Fraggle attack. A Fraggle attack is a type of denial-of-service (DoS) attack that exploits the User Datagram Protocol (UDP) by sending a large volume of UDP echo (port 7) or chargen (port 19) packets to the broadcast address of a network. Because broadcast addresses forward packets to all devices on the subnet, this causes all devices to respond simultaneously, amplifying the traffic directed at the victim. This flood of traffic can overwhelm the target's network resources, causing service disruption or complete denial of service. The vulnerability arises from the lack of filtering or blocking of UDP packets directed at broadcast addresses, which allows attackers to leverage network amplification. The CVSS score of 5.0 (medium severity) reflects that the attack requires no authentication and can be launched remotely over the network, but it only impacts availability without affecting confidentiality or integrity. Although this vulnerability was identified in 1998 and no patches are available, modern network devices and operating systems typically include mitigations by default, such as disabling UDP responses to broadcast addresses or filtering such traffic at routers and firewalls. However, legacy systems or misconfigured networks may still be susceptible to Fraggle attacks if they allow UDP broadcasts and respond to them. The attack does not require user interaction and can be automated by attackers to generate significant network disruption.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability is the risk of denial-of-service attacks that can disrupt critical network services. This can affect availability of internal systems, external-facing services, and potentially critical infrastructure if legacy or improperly configured network devices are present. Disruption of services can lead to operational downtime, loss of productivity, and potential financial losses. Organizations relying on legacy network equipment or with insufficient network segmentation and filtering are at higher risk. Additionally, sectors such as telecommunications, government, healthcare, and finance could be more severely impacted due to their reliance on continuous network availability. While the vulnerability does not compromise data confidentiality or integrity, the availability impact can indirectly affect business continuity and incident response capabilities. Given the age of the vulnerability, many modern networks may be resilient, but the risk remains for networks that have not implemented best practices for broadcast traffic filtering.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate the risk of Fraggle attacks exploiting this vulnerability, European organizations should implement the following specific measures: 1) Configure network devices (routers, switches, firewalls) to block or filter UDP traffic directed at broadcast addresses, especially on ports 7 (echo) and 19 (chargen). 2) Disable or restrict UDP services that respond to broadcast messages on all hosts and servers, particularly legacy systems. 3) Employ ingress and egress filtering to prevent spoofed IP addresses and broadcast traffic from entering or leaving the network perimeter. 4) Segment networks to limit broadcast domains and reduce the potential amplification scope. 5) Regularly audit network configurations and monitor for unusual UDP broadcast traffic patterns indicative of attempted Fraggle attacks. 6) Update or replace legacy network equipment that does not support modern filtering capabilities. 7) Implement rate limiting on UDP traffic where possible to reduce the impact of flooding attempts. These targeted actions go beyond generic advice by focusing on broadcast traffic controls and legacy system hardening, which are critical for mitigating this specific vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Poland, Belgium
CVE-1999-0514: UDP messages to broadcast addresses are allowed, allowing for a Fraggle attack that can cause a deni
Description
UDP messages to broadcast addresses are allowed, allowing for a Fraggle attack that can cause a denial of service by flooding the target.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0514 describes a network vulnerability where UDP messages sent to broadcast addresses are permitted, enabling a Fraggle attack. A Fraggle attack is a type of denial-of-service (DoS) attack that exploits the User Datagram Protocol (UDP) by sending a large volume of UDP echo (port 7) or chargen (port 19) packets to the broadcast address of a network. Because broadcast addresses forward packets to all devices on the subnet, this causes all devices to respond simultaneously, amplifying the traffic directed at the victim. This flood of traffic can overwhelm the target's network resources, causing service disruption or complete denial of service. The vulnerability arises from the lack of filtering or blocking of UDP packets directed at broadcast addresses, which allows attackers to leverage network amplification. The CVSS score of 5.0 (medium severity) reflects that the attack requires no authentication and can be launched remotely over the network, but it only impacts availability without affecting confidentiality or integrity. Although this vulnerability was identified in 1998 and no patches are available, modern network devices and operating systems typically include mitigations by default, such as disabling UDP responses to broadcast addresses or filtering such traffic at routers and firewalls. However, legacy systems or misconfigured networks may still be susceptible to Fraggle attacks if they allow UDP broadcasts and respond to them. The attack does not require user interaction and can be automated by attackers to generate significant network disruption.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability is the risk of denial-of-service attacks that can disrupt critical network services. This can affect availability of internal systems, external-facing services, and potentially critical infrastructure if legacy or improperly configured network devices are present. Disruption of services can lead to operational downtime, loss of productivity, and potential financial losses. Organizations relying on legacy network equipment or with insufficient network segmentation and filtering are at higher risk. Additionally, sectors such as telecommunications, government, healthcare, and finance could be more severely impacted due to their reliance on continuous network availability. While the vulnerability does not compromise data confidentiality or integrity, the availability impact can indirectly affect business continuity and incident response capabilities. Given the age of the vulnerability, many modern networks may be resilient, but the risk remains for networks that have not implemented best practices for broadcast traffic filtering.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate the risk of Fraggle attacks exploiting this vulnerability, European organizations should implement the following specific measures: 1) Configure network devices (routers, switches, firewalls) to block or filter UDP traffic directed at broadcast addresses, especially on ports 7 (echo) and 19 (chargen). 2) Disable or restrict UDP services that respond to broadcast messages on all hosts and servers, particularly legacy systems. 3) Employ ingress and egress filtering to prevent spoofed IP addresses and broadcast traffic from entering or leaving the network perimeter. 4) Segment networks to limit broadcast domains and reduce the potential amplification scope. 5) Regularly audit network configurations and monitor for unusual UDP broadcast traffic patterns indicative of attempted Fraggle attacks. 6) Update or replace legacy network equipment that does not support modern filtering capabilities. 7) Implement rate limiting on UDP traffic where possible to reduce the impact of flooding attempts. These targeted actions go beyond generic advice by focusing on broadcast traffic controls and legacy system hardening, which are critical for mitigating this specific vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7de91f
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 10:39:36 PM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 10:02:39 PM
Views: 34
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-15564: Divide By Zero in Mapnik
MediumCVE-2026-2113: Deserialization in yuan1994 tpadmin
MediumCVE-2026-2111: Path Traversal in JeecgBoot
MediumCVE-2026-2110: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts in Tasin1025 SwiftBuy
MediumCVE-2026-2109: Improper Authorization in jsbroks COCO Annotator
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.