CVE-1999-0523: ICMP echo (ping) is allowed from arbitrary hosts.
ICMP echo (ping) is allowed from arbitrary hosts.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0523 describes a vulnerability where ICMP echo requests (commonly known as ping) are allowed from arbitrary hosts to a target system. This is not a software flaw per se but rather a configuration or network policy issue where systems respond to ICMP echo requests from any source without restriction. ICMP echo requests are used primarily for network diagnostics and connectivity checks. Allowing unrestricted ICMP echo responses can enable attackers to perform reconnaissance activities such as network mapping, host discovery, and latency measurements. While the vulnerability itself does not directly compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability, it can provide valuable information to attackers that may facilitate further targeted attacks. The CVSS vector indicates no impact on confidentiality, integrity, or availability, no authentication required, and low complexity of attack. There is no patch available because this is a network configuration issue rather than a software bug. No known exploits are reported in the wild, and the vulnerability is considered low severity. However, in modern security practices, unrestricted ICMP echo responses are often considered a minor security risk and are sometimes disabled or filtered at firewalls or routers to reduce attack surface and reconnaissance opportunities.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability is generally low but not negligible. Attackers can use ICMP echo responses to identify live hosts within a network, which can be the first step in a multi-stage attack. This reconnaissance can lead to targeted exploitation of other vulnerabilities or unauthorized access attempts. In highly regulated sectors such as finance, healthcare, or critical infrastructure within Europe, even minor information disclosure can be leveraged by threat actors, including state-sponsored groups. Additionally, organizations with strict network segmentation and defense-in-depth strategies may find that unrestricted ICMP echo responses undermine their security posture by revealing network topology details. However, this vulnerability alone does not allow direct compromise or denial of service. It is more of an enabler for further attacks rather than a direct threat.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should implement network-level controls to restrict ICMP echo responses. This can be done by configuring firewalls, routers, and host-based firewalls to block or limit ICMP echo requests from untrusted or external networks. Specifically, organizations should: 1) Disable ICMP echo replies on internet-facing interfaces unless explicitly required for operational purposes; 2) Implement ingress and egress filtering to restrict ICMP traffic to trusted sources; 3) Use network segmentation and access control lists (ACLs) to limit ICMP traffic within internal networks; 4) Monitor ICMP traffic patterns for unusual activity that may indicate reconnaissance attempts; 5) Document and justify any exceptions where ICMP echo is allowed for legitimate network management needs. These measures reduce the attack surface and hinder attackers' ability to map the network without impacting legitimate network operations.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Poland, Belgium, Sweden, Switzerland
CVE-1999-0523: ICMP echo (ping) is allowed from arbitrary hosts.
Description
ICMP echo (ping) is allowed from arbitrary hosts.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0523 describes a vulnerability where ICMP echo requests (commonly known as ping) are allowed from arbitrary hosts to a target system. This is not a software flaw per se but rather a configuration or network policy issue where systems respond to ICMP echo requests from any source without restriction. ICMP echo requests are used primarily for network diagnostics and connectivity checks. Allowing unrestricted ICMP echo responses can enable attackers to perform reconnaissance activities such as network mapping, host discovery, and latency measurements. While the vulnerability itself does not directly compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability, it can provide valuable information to attackers that may facilitate further targeted attacks. The CVSS vector indicates no impact on confidentiality, integrity, or availability, no authentication required, and low complexity of attack. There is no patch available because this is a network configuration issue rather than a software bug. No known exploits are reported in the wild, and the vulnerability is considered low severity. However, in modern security practices, unrestricted ICMP echo responses are often considered a minor security risk and are sometimes disabled or filtered at firewalls or routers to reduce attack surface and reconnaissance opportunities.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability is generally low but not negligible. Attackers can use ICMP echo responses to identify live hosts within a network, which can be the first step in a multi-stage attack. This reconnaissance can lead to targeted exploitation of other vulnerabilities or unauthorized access attempts. In highly regulated sectors such as finance, healthcare, or critical infrastructure within Europe, even minor information disclosure can be leveraged by threat actors, including state-sponsored groups. Additionally, organizations with strict network segmentation and defense-in-depth strategies may find that unrestricted ICMP echo responses undermine their security posture by revealing network topology details. However, this vulnerability alone does not allow direct compromise or denial of service. It is more of an enabler for further attacks rather than a direct threat.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should implement network-level controls to restrict ICMP echo responses. This can be done by configuring firewalls, routers, and host-based firewalls to block or limit ICMP echo requests from untrusted or external networks. Specifically, organizations should: 1) Disable ICMP echo replies on internet-facing interfaces unless explicitly required for operational purposes; 2) Implement ingress and egress filtering to restrict ICMP traffic to trusted sources; 3) Use network segmentation and access control lists (ACLs) to limit ICMP traffic within internal networks; 4) Monitor ICMP traffic patterns for unusual activity that may indicate reconnaissance attempts; 5) Document and justify any exceptions where ICMP echo is allowed for legitimate network management needs. These measures reduce the attack surface and hinder attackers' ability to map the network without impacting legitimate network operations.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7dec1e
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 8:56:30 PM
Last updated: 8/18/2025, 11:35:30 PM
Views: 21
Related Threats
CVE-2025-43733: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') in Liferay Portal
LowCVE-2025-54234: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918) in Adobe ColdFusion
LowCVE-2025-3639: CWE-288: Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel in Liferay Portal
LowCVE-2025-9091: Hard-coded Credentials in Tenda AC20
LowCVE-2025-9092: CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. Bouncy Castle for Java - BC-FJA 2.1.0
LowActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.