CVE-1999-0531: Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is sol
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "An SMTP service supports EXPN, VRFY, HELP, ESMTP, and/or EHLO.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0531 is a rejected vulnerability candidate originally related to SMTP services supporting commands such as EXPN, VRFY, HELP, ESMTP, and EHLO. The candidate was rejected because it does not represent a direct security vulnerability but rather a configuration aspect that should be classified under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE) rather than as a vulnerability. The original concern was that SMTP servers supporting these commands could potentially be used to enumerate valid email addresses or gather information about the mail server, which could aid attackers in reconnaissance activities. However, this behavior is considered a configuration choice rather than an inherent security flaw. Since no specific affected versions, patches, or exploits are associated with this candidate, it does not represent an active or exploitable vulnerability. The medium severity rating appears to be a legacy classification and does not reflect an actual risk. Overall, this candidate is more about security best practices in configuring SMTP servers to limit information disclosure rather than a direct threat or vulnerability.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this candidate is minimal to none because it is not a true vulnerability but a configuration consideration. SMTP servers that allow commands like EXPN and VRFY can potentially leak information about valid email addresses, which could facilitate phishing or social engineering attacks if combined with other threat intelligence. However, this is an indirect risk and does not compromise system confidentiality, integrity, or availability by itself. Organizations that have properly configured their mail servers to disable or restrict these commands reduce the risk of information leakage. Given the lack of known exploits or active attacks, the direct impact on European entities is negligible. Nonetheless, organizations should remain vigilant about mail server configurations as part of their broader security hygiene to prevent information disclosure that could aid attackers.
Mitigation Recommendations
Specific mitigation recommendations include: 1) Disable or restrict SMTP commands such as EXPN and VRFY on mail servers unless explicitly required for operational purposes. 2) Implement access controls or authentication requirements for SMTP commands that could reveal user information. 3) Regularly audit mail server configurations to ensure that unnecessary commands are disabled. 4) Employ monitoring and alerting for unusual SMTP command usage patterns that could indicate reconnaissance attempts. 5) Educate IT staff on the importance of minimizing information disclosure through service banners and protocol commands. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on configuration hardening and operational monitoring specific to SMTP services.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy
CVE-1999-0531: Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is sol
Description
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "An SMTP service supports EXPN, VRFY, HELP, ESMTP, and/or EHLO.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0531 is a rejected vulnerability candidate originally related to SMTP services supporting commands such as EXPN, VRFY, HELP, ESMTP, and EHLO. The candidate was rejected because it does not represent a direct security vulnerability but rather a configuration aspect that should be classified under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE) rather than as a vulnerability. The original concern was that SMTP servers supporting these commands could potentially be used to enumerate valid email addresses or gather information about the mail server, which could aid attackers in reconnaissance activities. However, this behavior is considered a configuration choice rather than an inherent security flaw. Since no specific affected versions, patches, or exploits are associated with this candidate, it does not represent an active or exploitable vulnerability. The medium severity rating appears to be a legacy classification and does not reflect an actual risk. Overall, this candidate is more about security best practices in configuring SMTP servers to limit information disclosure rather than a direct threat or vulnerability.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this candidate is minimal to none because it is not a true vulnerability but a configuration consideration. SMTP servers that allow commands like EXPN and VRFY can potentially leak information about valid email addresses, which could facilitate phishing or social engineering attacks if combined with other threat intelligence. However, this is an indirect risk and does not compromise system confidentiality, integrity, or availability by itself. Organizations that have properly configured their mail servers to disable or restrict these commands reduce the risk of information leakage. Given the lack of known exploits or active attacks, the direct impact on European entities is negligible. Nonetheless, organizations should remain vigilant about mail server configurations as part of their broader security hygiene to prevent information disclosure that could aid attackers.
Mitigation Recommendations
Specific mitigation recommendations include: 1) Disable or restrict SMTP commands such as EXPN and VRFY on mail servers unless explicitly required for operational purposes. 2) Implement access controls or authentication requirements for SMTP commands that could reveal user information. 3) Regularly audit mail server configurations to ensure that unnecessary commands are disabled. 4) Employ monitoring and alerting for unusual SMTP command usage patterns that could indicate reconnaissance attempts. 5) Educate IT staff on the importance of minimizing information disclosure through service banners and protocol commands. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on configuration hardening and operational monitoring specific to SMTP services.
Affected Countries
Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7dec33
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 8:56:16 PM
Last updated: 2/3/2026, 12:56:45 AM
Views: 51
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-25228: CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in SignalK signalk-server
MediumCVE-2026-25222: CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in polarnl PolarLearn
MediumCVE-2026-24043: CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') in parallax jsPDF
MediumCVE-2026-24040: CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') in parallax jsPDF
MediumCVE-2026-24007: CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Enalean tuleap
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.