CVE-1999-0631: Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is sol
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The NFS service is running.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0631 was originally assigned as a candidate vulnerability related to the NFS (Network File System) service running on a system. However, this candidate number was later rejected and marked as not to be used because the issue described was not a direct security vulnerability but rather a configuration state. Specifically, the presence of the NFS service running is a configuration detail that by itself does not introduce a security flaw. Instead, it is more appropriately categorized under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE), which tracks configuration issues rather than vulnerabilities. Therefore, CVE-1999-0631 does not describe an exploitable vulnerability or a security threat but rather a configuration condition that could be relevant in security assessments. No affected versions, patches, or known exploits are associated with this CVE, and it has been deprecated in the vulnerability databases. The original concern was that running NFS services without proper configuration could potentially expose systems, but this is a matter of secure configuration management rather than a software flaw.
Potential Impact
Since CVE-1999-0631 does not represent an actual vulnerability but a configuration state, it does not have a direct impact on confidentiality, integrity, or availability. However, the presence of an NFS service running on a system without proper security controls can potentially expose sensitive data or allow unauthorized access if misconfigured. For European organizations, especially those handling sensitive or regulated data, improperly configured NFS services could lead to data exposure or unauthorized access. The impact is therefore indirect and depends on the security posture and configuration management practices of the organization rather than a flaw in the software itself.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should ensure that any NFS services running on their networks are securely configured according to best practices. This includes restricting access to trusted hosts and networks, using strong authentication and authorization mechanisms, disabling NFS if not required, and regularly auditing NFS configurations. Network segmentation and firewall rules should be applied to limit exposure. Additionally, organizations should maintain an up-to-date inventory of services running on their systems and apply configuration management policies to prevent insecure configurations. Since this is a configuration issue rather than a software vulnerability, patching is not applicable, but continuous monitoring and secure configuration enforcement are critical.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Poland, Sweden
CVE-1999-0631: Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is sol
Description
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The NFS service is running.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0631 was originally assigned as a candidate vulnerability related to the NFS (Network File System) service running on a system. However, this candidate number was later rejected and marked as not to be used because the issue described was not a direct security vulnerability but rather a configuration state. Specifically, the presence of the NFS service running is a configuration detail that by itself does not introduce a security flaw. Instead, it is more appropriately categorized under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE), which tracks configuration issues rather than vulnerabilities. Therefore, CVE-1999-0631 does not describe an exploitable vulnerability or a security threat but rather a configuration condition that could be relevant in security assessments. No affected versions, patches, or known exploits are associated with this CVE, and it has been deprecated in the vulnerability databases. The original concern was that running NFS services without proper configuration could potentially expose systems, but this is a matter of secure configuration management rather than a software flaw.
Potential Impact
Since CVE-1999-0631 does not represent an actual vulnerability but a configuration state, it does not have a direct impact on confidentiality, integrity, or availability. However, the presence of an NFS service running on a system without proper security controls can potentially expose sensitive data or allow unauthorized access if misconfigured. For European organizations, especially those handling sensitive or regulated data, improperly configured NFS services could lead to data exposure or unauthorized access. The impact is therefore indirect and depends on the security posture and configuration management practices of the organization rather than a flaw in the software itself.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should ensure that any NFS services running on their networks are securely configured according to best practices. This includes restricting access to trusted hosts and networks, using strong authentication and authorization mechanisms, disabling NFS if not required, and regularly auditing NFS configurations. Network segmentation and firewall rules should be applied to limit exposure. Additionally, organizations should maintain an up-to-date inventory of services running on their systems and apply configuration management policies to prevent insecure configurations. Since this is a configuration issue rather than a software vulnerability, patching is not applicable, but continuous monitoring and secure configuration enforcement are critical.
Affected Countries
Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7decda
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 8:41:31 PM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 4:41:14 AM
Views: 32
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-2073: SQL Injection in itsourcecode School Management System
MediumCVE-2025-31990: CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in HCLSoftware HCL DevOps Velocity
MediumCVE-2026-2069: Stack-based Buffer Overflow in ggml-org llama.cpp
MediumCVE-2026-25760: CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in BishopFox sliver
MediumCVE-2026-25574: CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in payloadcms payload
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.