CVE-1999-0642: Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is sol
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "A POP service is running.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0642 is a rejected vulnerability candidate originally associated with the presence of a POP (Post Office Protocol) service running on a system. The candidate was rejected because it does not represent a direct security vulnerability but rather a configuration state that could be cataloged under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE) framework. The initial concern was that running a POP service might expose systems to potential risks; however, the candidate was withdrawn as it does not inherently introduce a security flaw by itself. There are no affected versions specified, no patches available, and no known exploits in the wild related to this candidate. The description indicates that this issue is more about configuration management and does not directly impact confidentiality, integrity, or availability of systems. Therefore, it is not considered a vulnerability in the traditional sense but rather a configuration consideration that administrators should be aware of when managing POP services.
Potential Impact
Given that CVE-1999-0642 is not an actual vulnerability but a rejected candidate related to configuration, the direct impact on European organizations is negligible. Running a POP service alone does not constitute a security risk unless it is misconfigured or combined with other vulnerabilities. European organizations that operate legacy email systems using POP might consider reviewing their configurations to ensure secure settings, but there is no immediate threat or exploit associated with this candidate. The lack of known exploits and absence of patches further indicate that this issue does not pose a tangible risk. Consequently, the impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is minimal to none. Organizations should continue to follow best practices for email service configuration and decommission legacy protocols where possible to reduce attack surface.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since CVE-1999-0642 is not a valid vulnerability but a configuration note, mitigation focuses on secure configuration management rather than patching. European organizations should: 1) Audit their email services to identify any running POP servers. 2) Ensure that POP services, if required, are configured securely with strong authentication mechanisms and encrypted connections (e.g., POP3S over TLS). 3) Disable POP services if they are not needed to reduce attack surface. 4) Regularly update and patch email server software to protect against other known vulnerabilities. 5) Employ network segmentation and firewall rules to restrict access to email services only to authorized users and networks. 6) Monitor logs for unusual activity related to email protocols. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on configuration hygiene and minimizing exposure of legacy protocols.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Poland
CVE-1999-0642: Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is sol
Description
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "A POP service is running.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0642 is a rejected vulnerability candidate originally associated with the presence of a POP (Post Office Protocol) service running on a system. The candidate was rejected because it does not represent a direct security vulnerability but rather a configuration state that could be cataloged under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE) framework. The initial concern was that running a POP service might expose systems to potential risks; however, the candidate was withdrawn as it does not inherently introduce a security flaw by itself. There are no affected versions specified, no patches available, and no known exploits in the wild related to this candidate. The description indicates that this issue is more about configuration management and does not directly impact confidentiality, integrity, or availability of systems. Therefore, it is not considered a vulnerability in the traditional sense but rather a configuration consideration that administrators should be aware of when managing POP services.
Potential Impact
Given that CVE-1999-0642 is not an actual vulnerability but a rejected candidate related to configuration, the direct impact on European organizations is negligible. Running a POP service alone does not constitute a security risk unless it is misconfigured or combined with other vulnerabilities. European organizations that operate legacy email systems using POP might consider reviewing their configurations to ensure secure settings, but there is no immediate threat or exploit associated with this candidate. The lack of known exploits and absence of patches further indicate that this issue does not pose a tangible risk. Consequently, the impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is minimal to none. Organizations should continue to follow best practices for email service configuration and decommission legacy protocols where possible to reduce attack surface.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since CVE-1999-0642 is not a valid vulnerability but a configuration note, mitigation focuses on secure configuration management rather than patching. European organizations should: 1) Audit their email services to identify any running POP servers. 2) Ensure that POP services, if required, are configured securely with strong authentication mechanisms and encrypted connections (e.g., POP3S over TLS). 3) Disable POP services if they are not needed to reduce attack surface. 4) Regularly update and patch email server software to protect against other known vulnerabilities. 5) Employ network segmentation and firewall rules to restrict access to email services only to authorized users and networks. 6) Monitor logs for unusual activity related to email protocols. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on configuration hygiene and minimizing exposure of legacy protocols.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7decfb
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 8:39:58 PM
Last updated: 8/12/2025, 7:39:56 AM
Views: 14
Related Threats
CVE-2025-54862: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') in Santesoft Sante PACS Server
MediumCVE-2025-54759: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') in Santesoft Sante PACS Server
MediumCVE-2025-9119: Cross Site Scripting in Netis WF2419
MediumCVE-2025-55590: n/a
MediumCVE-2025-55589: n/a
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.