CVE-1999-0647: Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is sol
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The bootparam (bootparamd) service is running.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0647 was originally assigned to a condition involving the bootparam (bootparamd) service running on systems. However, this candidate number has been rejected and marked as not to be used because the issue described does not represent a direct security vulnerability. Instead, it pertains to a configuration aspect that does not inherently introduce security risks. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) program determined that this matter is more appropriately addressed under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE), which catalogs configuration issues rather than software flaws or exploitable vulnerabilities. The bootparamd service historically provided network boot parameters to diskless clients, and while running unnecessary services can increase attack surface, the presence of this service alone does not constitute a vulnerability. There are no affected versions listed, no patches available, and no known exploits in the wild. The original description was minimal and did not specify any exploit vectors or impact scenarios. Therefore, this entry does not represent an actionable security threat but rather a configuration consideration.
Potential Impact
Since CVE-1999-0647 does not describe an actual vulnerability but a configuration state, the direct impact on confidentiality, integrity, or availability is negligible. For European organizations, this means there is no immediate risk or exploit to defend against related to this CVE. However, running unnecessary or legacy services like bootparamd can increase the attack surface if combined with other vulnerabilities or misconfigurations. In practice, organizations should ensure that only required services are enabled to reduce potential exposure. The lack of known exploits and absence of patches further indicates no active threat. Thus, the impact is minimal and largely theoretical, focused on best practices in system hardening rather than urgent remediation.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given that this is a configuration issue rather than a vulnerability, mitigation involves standard system hardening practices. European organizations should audit their systems to identify and disable unnecessary legacy services such as bootparamd, especially on modern infrastructure where such services are rarely needed. Employ configuration management tools to enforce minimal service footprints and regularly review running services. Network segmentation and firewall rules can also limit exposure if legacy services must remain active for compatibility reasons. Since no patches or updates are associated with this CVE, focus should be on operational controls and adherence to security baselines. Documentation and awareness training can help ensure that system administrators understand the importance of disabling unused services to reduce attack surfaces.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy
CVE-1999-0647: Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is sol
Description
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The bootparam (bootparamd) service is running.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0647 was originally assigned to a condition involving the bootparam (bootparamd) service running on systems. However, this candidate number has been rejected and marked as not to be used because the issue described does not represent a direct security vulnerability. Instead, it pertains to a configuration aspect that does not inherently introduce security risks. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) program determined that this matter is more appropriately addressed under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE), which catalogs configuration issues rather than software flaws or exploitable vulnerabilities. The bootparamd service historically provided network boot parameters to diskless clients, and while running unnecessary services can increase attack surface, the presence of this service alone does not constitute a vulnerability. There are no affected versions listed, no patches available, and no known exploits in the wild. The original description was minimal and did not specify any exploit vectors or impact scenarios. Therefore, this entry does not represent an actionable security threat but rather a configuration consideration.
Potential Impact
Since CVE-1999-0647 does not describe an actual vulnerability but a configuration state, the direct impact on confidentiality, integrity, or availability is negligible. For European organizations, this means there is no immediate risk or exploit to defend against related to this CVE. However, running unnecessary or legacy services like bootparamd can increase the attack surface if combined with other vulnerabilities or misconfigurations. In practice, organizations should ensure that only required services are enabled to reduce potential exposure. The lack of known exploits and absence of patches further indicates no active threat. Thus, the impact is minimal and largely theoretical, focused on best practices in system hardening rather than urgent remediation.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given that this is a configuration issue rather than a vulnerability, mitigation involves standard system hardening practices. European organizations should audit their systems to identify and disable unnecessary legacy services such as bootparamd, especially on modern infrastructure where such services are rarely needed. Employ configuration management tools to enforce minimal service footprints and regularly review running services. Network segmentation and firewall rules can also limit exposure if legacy services must remain active for compatibility reasons. Since no patches or updates are associated with this CVE, focus should be on operational controls and adherence to security baselines. Documentation and awareness training can help ensure that system administrators understand the importance of disabling unused services to reduce attack surfaces.
Affected Countries
Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7ded10
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 8:26:27 PM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 10:45:30 AM
Views: 37
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-2083: SQL Injection in code-projects Social Networking Site
MediumCVE-2026-2082: OS Command Injection in D-Link DIR-823X
MediumCVE-2026-2079: Improper Authorization in yeqifu warehouse
MediumCVE-2026-1675: CWE-1188 Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default in brstefanovic Advanced Country Blocker
MediumCVE-2026-1643: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in ariagle MP-Ukagaka
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.