CVE-1999-0659: Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is sol
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "A Windows NT Primary Domain Controller (PDC) or Backup Domain Controller (BDC) is present.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0659 is a rejected vulnerability candidate originally associated with Windows NT Primary Domain Controllers (PDC) or Backup Domain Controllers (BDC). The candidate was withdrawn because it did not represent a direct security vulnerability but rather a configuration issue better addressed under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE) framework. The initial description suggested potential concerns related to the presence of a Windows NT PDC or BDC, but no specific exploit or vulnerability was identified. No affected versions or patches exist, and there are no known exploits in the wild. Essentially, this entry does not describe an actionable security threat but highlights the importance of secure configuration management for legacy Windows NT domain controllers. Since Windows NT is an obsolete platform, the relevance of this candidate today is minimal, and it does not represent a direct risk vector.
Potential Impact
Given that CVE-1999-0659 was rejected as a vulnerability and pertains only to configuration aspects of legacy Windows NT domain controllers, the direct impact on European organizations is negligible. Modern enterprise environments have largely migrated away from Windows NT to supported operating systems with active security updates. However, organizations still operating legacy infrastructure with Windows NT domain controllers may face indirect risks if insecure configurations lead to unauthorized access or domain compromise. Such legacy systems could be leveraged as pivot points in broader attacks, potentially impacting confidentiality, integrity, and availability of domain resources. For most European organizations, the impact is minimal due to the obsolescence of the affected technology and the absence of a direct vulnerability or exploit.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since this candidate is not a vulnerability but a configuration issue, mitigation focuses on best practices for legacy system management and secure configuration. Organizations should: 1) Decommission Windows NT domain controllers and migrate to supported Windows Server versions with active security support. 2) If legacy systems must remain, ensure strict network segmentation and access controls to limit exposure. 3) Regularly audit domain controller configurations using established security baselines and tools aligned with Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE) guidelines. 4) Employ modern identity and access management solutions to reduce reliance on legacy authentication mechanisms. 5) Maintain comprehensive monitoring and incident response capabilities to detect anomalous activity related to legacy infrastructure.
Affected Countries
Germany, United Kingdom, France, Italy, Spain, Netherlands
CVE-1999-0659: Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is sol
Description
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "A Windows NT Primary Domain Controller (PDC) or Backup Domain Controller (BDC) is present.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0659 is a rejected vulnerability candidate originally associated with Windows NT Primary Domain Controllers (PDC) or Backup Domain Controllers (BDC). The candidate was withdrawn because it did not represent a direct security vulnerability but rather a configuration issue better addressed under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE) framework. The initial description suggested potential concerns related to the presence of a Windows NT PDC or BDC, but no specific exploit or vulnerability was identified. No affected versions or patches exist, and there are no known exploits in the wild. Essentially, this entry does not describe an actionable security threat but highlights the importance of secure configuration management for legacy Windows NT domain controllers. Since Windows NT is an obsolete platform, the relevance of this candidate today is minimal, and it does not represent a direct risk vector.
Potential Impact
Given that CVE-1999-0659 was rejected as a vulnerability and pertains only to configuration aspects of legacy Windows NT domain controllers, the direct impact on European organizations is negligible. Modern enterprise environments have largely migrated away from Windows NT to supported operating systems with active security updates. However, organizations still operating legacy infrastructure with Windows NT domain controllers may face indirect risks if insecure configurations lead to unauthorized access or domain compromise. Such legacy systems could be leveraged as pivot points in broader attacks, potentially impacting confidentiality, integrity, and availability of domain resources. For most European organizations, the impact is minimal due to the obsolescence of the affected technology and the absence of a direct vulnerability or exploit.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since this candidate is not a vulnerability but a configuration issue, mitigation focuses on best practices for legacy system management and secure configuration. Organizations should: 1) Decommission Windows NT domain controllers and migrate to supported Windows Server versions with active security support. 2) If legacy systems must remain, ensure strict network segmentation and access controls to limit exposure. 3) Regularly audit domain controller configurations using established security baselines and tools aligned with Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE) guidelines. 4) Employ modern identity and access management solutions to reduce reliance on legacy authentication mechanisms. 5) Maintain comprehensive monitoring and incident response capabilities to detect anomalous activity related to legacy infrastructure.
Affected Countries
Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7ded33
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 8:25:05 PM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 7:58:56 AM
Views: 31
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-2077: Improper Authorization in yeqifu warehouse
MediumCVE-2026-2076: Improper Authorization in yeqifu warehouse
MediumCVE-2025-15267: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in boldthemes Bold Page Builder
MediumCVE-2025-13463: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in boldthemes Bold Page Builder
MediumCVE-2025-12803: CWE-80 Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) in boldthemes Bold Page Builder
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.