CVE-1999-0829: HP Secure Web Console uses weak encryption.
HP Secure Web Console uses weak encryption.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0829 identifies a vulnerability in the HP Secure Web Console where weak encryption algorithms are used to protect data. The HP Secure Web Console is a management interface product designed to provide web-based access to system and network management functions. The weakness in encryption implies that data transmitted between clients and the console could be susceptible to interception and decryption by attackers using relatively simple cryptanalysis techniques or brute force methods. This vulnerability does not affect the integrity or availability of the system directly but compromises confidentiality by allowing unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information. The CVSS vector indicates that the attack can be performed remotely (AV:N), with low attack complexity (AC:L), no authentication required (Au:N), and results in partial confidentiality impact (C:P) without affecting integrity (I:N) or availability (A:N). Since the vulnerability was published in 1999 and no patches are available, it suggests that the product or version affected is likely legacy or deprecated. There are no known exploits in the wild, but the weak encryption still poses a risk if the product remains in use.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability is the potential exposure of sensitive management data transmitted via the HP Secure Web Console. This could include administrative credentials, configuration details, or monitoring data, which if intercepted, could facilitate further attacks or unauthorized access. Organizations in sectors with stringent data protection regulations, such as finance, healthcare, and critical infrastructure, could face compliance risks if sensitive data confidentiality is compromised. Additionally, interception of management traffic could lead to targeted attacks on network infrastructure. However, since the vulnerability does not affect integrity or availability, the direct operational impact is limited. The risk is higher in environments where legacy HP Secure Web Console versions are still deployed without encryption upgrades or compensating controls.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given that no patches are available for this vulnerability, European organizations should consider the following specific mitigation steps: 1) Immediately assess and identify any deployments of HP Secure Web Console in their environment, especially legacy versions. 2) If the product is still in use, disable or restrict access to the console to trusted internal networks only, preventing exposure over untrusted or public networks. 3) Implement network-level encryption such as VPN tunnels or IPsec to protect management traffic externally. 4) Where possible, upgrade to newer management solutions that support strong, modern encryption standards (e.g., TLS 1.2 or higher). 5) Monitor network traffic for signs of interception or suspicious activity around management interfaces. 6) Enforce strict access controls and multi-factor authentication on management consoles to reduce risk if traffic is intercepted. 7) Document and review compliance implications related to the use of weak encryption in management tools and plan for phased decommissioning or replacement.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Belgium, Sweden
CVE-1999-0829: HP Secure Web Console uses weak encryption.
Description
HP Secure Web Console uses weak encryption.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0829 identifies a vulnerability in the HP Secure Web Console where weak encryption algorithms are used to protect data. The HP Secure Web Console is a management interface product designed to provide web-based access to system and network management functions. The weakness in encryption implies that data transmitted between clients and the console could be susceptible to interception and decryption by attackers using relatively simple cryptanalysis techniques or brute force methods. This vulnerability does not affect the integrity or availability of the system directly but compromises confidentiality by allowing unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information. The CVSS vector indicates that the attack can be performed remotely (AV:N), with low attack complexity (AC:L), no authentication required (Au:N), and results in partial confidentiality impact (C:P) without affecting integrity (I:N) or availability (A:N). Since the vulnerability was published in 1999 and no patches are available, it suggests that the product or version affected is likely legacy or deprecated. There are no known exploits in the wild, but the weak encryption still poses a risk if the product remains in use.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability is the potential exposure of sensitive management data transmitted via the HP Secure Web Console. This could include administrative credentials, configuration details, or monitoring data, which if intercepted, could facilitate further attacks or unauthorized access. Organizations in sectors with stringent data protection regulations, such as finance, healthcare, and critical infrastructure, could face compliance risks if sensitive data confidentiality is compromised. Additionally, interception of management traffic could lead to targeted attacks on network infrastructure. However, since the vulnerability does not affect integrity or availability, the direct operational impact is limited. The risk is higher in environments where legacy HP Secure Web Console versions are still deployed without encryption upgrades or compensating controls.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given that no patches are available for this vulnerability, European organizations should consider the following specific mitigation steps: 1) Immediately assess and identify any deployments of HP Secure Web Console in their environment, especially legacy versions. 2) If the product is still in use, disable or restrict access to the console to trusted internal networks only, preventing exposure over untrusted or public networks. 3) Implement network-level encryption such as VPN tunnels or IPsec to protect management traffic externally. 4) Where possible, upgrade to newer management solutions that support strong, modern encryption standards (e.g., TLS 1.2 or higher). 5) Monitor network traffic for signs of interception or suspicious activity around management interfaces. 6) Enforce strict access controls and multi-factor authentication on management consoles to reduce risk if traffic is intercepted. 7) Document and review compliance implications related to the use of weak encryption in management tools and plan for phased decommissioning or replacement.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Threat ID: 682ca32cb6fd31d6ed7df362
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:40 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 2:24:33 PM
Last updated: 7/30/2025, 10:25:33 PM
Views: 14
Related Threats
CVE-2025-8293: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in Theerawat Patthawee Intl DateTime Calendar
MediumCVE-2025-7686: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in lmyoaoa weichuncai(WP伪春菜)
MediumCVE-2025-7684: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in remysharp Last.fm Recent Album Artwork
MediumCVE-2025-7683: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in janyksteenbeek LatestCheckins
MediumCVE-2025-7668: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in timothyja Linux Promotional Plugin
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.