CVE-1999-1085: SSH 1.2.25, 1.2.23, and other versions, when used in in CBC (Cipher Block Chaining) or CFB (Cipher F
SSH 1.2.25, 1.2.23, and other versions, when used in in CBC (Cipher Block Chaining) or CFB (Cipher Feedback 64 bits) modes, allows remote attackers to insert arbitrary data into an existing stream between an SSH client and server by using a known plaintext attack and computing a valid CRC-32 checksum for the packet, aka the "SSH insertion attack."
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-1085 is a vulnerability affecting older versions of the Secure Shell (SSH) protocol, specifically versions 1.2.23, 1.2.25, and other similar releases. The vulnerability arises when SSH is used with Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) or Cipher Feedback (CFB) modes for encryption. In these modes, an attacker can exploit a known plaintext attack combined with the ability to compute a valid CRC-32 checksum for the packet. This allows the attacker to insert arbitrary data into an existing encrypted communication stream between an SSH client and server without detection. This attack is commonly referred to as the "SSH insertion attack." The vulnerability does not compromise confidentiality directly (no data decryption), but it impacts the integrity of the communication by allowing unauthorized modification of the data stream. The attack requires no authentication and can be performed remotely over the network. The vulnerability was disclosed in 1998 and has a CVSS v2 base score of 5.0, indicating a medium severity level. There are no patches available for these legacy SSH versions, and no known exploits in the wild have been reported recently. However, the vulnerability highlights fundamental weaknesses in the SSH 1.x protocol design and encryption modes that have since been addressed in later SSH versions (SSH-2).
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability lies in the potential unauthorized modification of SSH sessions that rely on legacy SSH 1.x implementations. While modern SSH deployments have largely migrated to SSH-2, some legacy systems, embedded devices, or specialized industrial control systems may still use vulnerable SSH 1.x versions. Exploiting this vulnerability could allow attackers to inject malicious commands or alter transmitted data, potentially leading to unauthorized actions, disruption of operations, or lateral movement within networks. Although confidentiality is not directly compromised, the integrity breach can undermine trust in secure communications, possibly facilitating further attacks such as privilege escalation or data manipulation. Given the medium severity and lack of known active exploitation, the immediate risk is moderate but should not be ignored, especially in critical infrastructure sectors or organizations with legacy system dependencies.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate mitigation involves auditing all SSH deployments to identify any use of SSH 1.x versions, particularly 1.2.23 and 1.2.25. 2. Replace all legacy SSH 1.x implementations with modern, actively maintained SSH-2 protocol versions, which address this and other vulnerabilities. 3. For systems where upgrading SSH is not feasible, consider isolating these systems within segmented network zones with strict access controls and monitoring to limit exposure. 4. Employ network intrusion detection systems (NIDS) capable of detecting anomalous SSH traffic patterns that may indicate attempts to exploit this vulnerability. 5. Educate system administrators about the risks of legacy SSH versions and enforce policies that prohibit their use. 6. Regularly review and update cryptographic configurations to ensure use of secure encryption modes and algorithms. 7. Implement comprehensive logging and alerting on SSH sessions to detect unauthorized modifications or suspicious activities.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Poland, Sweden
CVE-1999-1085: SSH 1.2.25, 1.2.23, and other versions, when used in in CBC (Cipher Block Chaining) or CFB (Cipher F
Description
SSH 1.2.25, 1.2.23, and other versions, when used in in CBC (Cipher Block Chaining) or CFB (Cipher Feedback 64 bits) modes, allows remote attackers to insert arbitrary data into an existing stream between an SSH client and server by using a known plaintext attack and computing a valid CRC-32 checksum for the packet, aka the "SSH insertion attack."
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-1085 is a vulnerability affecting older versions of the Secure Shell (SSH) protocol, specifically versions 1.2.23, 1.2.25, and other similar releases. The vulnerability arises when SSH is used with Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) or Cipher Feedback (CFB) modes for encryption. In these modes, an attacker can exploit a known plaintext attack combined with the ability to compute a valid CRC-32 checksum for the packet. This allows the attacker to insert arbitrary data into an existing encrypted communication stream between an SSH client and server without detection. This attack is commonly referred to as the "SSH insertion attack." The vulnerability does not compromise confidentiality directly (no data decryption), but it impacts the integrity of the communication by allowing unauthorized modification of the data stream. The attack requires no authentication and can be performed remotely over the network. The vulnerability was disclosed in 1998 and has a CVSS v2 base score of 5.0, indicating a medium severity level. There are no patches available for these legacy SSH versions, and no known exploits in the wild have been reported recently. However, the vulnerability highlights fundamental weaknesses in the SSH 1.x protocol design and encryption modes that have since been addressed in later SSH versions (SSH-2).
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability lies in the potential unauthorized modification of SSH sessions that rely on legacy SSH 1.x implementations. While modern SSH deployments have largely migrated to SSH-2, some legacy systems, embedded devices, or specialized industrial control systems may still use vulnerable SSH 1.x versions. Exploiting this vulnerability could allow attackers to inject malicious commands or alter transmitted data, potentially leading to unauthorized actions, disruption of operations, or lateral movement within networks. Although confidentiality is not directly compromised, the integrity breach can undermine trust in secure communications, possibly facilitating further attacks such as privilege escalation or data manipulation. Given the medium severity and lack of known active exploitation, the immediate risk is moderate but should not be ignored, especially in critical infrastructure sectors or organizations with legacy system dependencies.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate mitigation involves auditing all SSH deployments to identify any use of SSH 1.x versions, particularly 1.2.23 and 1.2.25. 2. Replace all legacy SSH 1.x implementations with modern, actively maintained SSH-2 protocol versions, which address this and other vulnerabilities. 3. For systems where upgrading SSH is not feasible, consider isolating these systems within segmented network zones with strict access controls and monitoring to limit exposure. 4. Employ network intrusion detection systems (NIDS) capable of detecting anomalous SSH traffic patterns that may indicate attempts to exploit this vulnerability. 5. Educate system administrators about the risks of legacy SSH versions and enforce policies that prohibit their use. 6. Regularly review and update cryptographic configurations to ensure use of secure encryption modes and algorithms. 7. Implement comprehensive logging and alerting on SSH sessions to detect unauthorized modifications or suspicious activities.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7de9ee
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 10:10:35 PM
Last updated: 7/26/2025, 5:10:19 PM
Views: 11
Related Threats
CVE-2025-43736: CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in Liferay Portal
MediumCVE-2025-8885: CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. Bouncy Castle for Java
MediumCVE-2025-26398: CWE-798 Use of Hard-coded Credentials in SolarWinds Database Performance Analyzer
MediumCVE-2025-8874: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in litonice13 Master Addons – Elementor Addons with White Label, Free Widgets, Hover Effects, Conditions, & Animations
MediumCVE-2025-8767: CWE-1236 Improper Neutralization of Formula Elements in a CSV File in anwppro AnWP Football Leagues
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.