Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-1999-1177: Directory traversal vulnerability in nph-publish before 1.2 allows remote attackers to overwrite arb

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-1999-1177cve-1999-1177directory traversal
Published: Fri Dec 31 1999 (12/31/1999, 05:00:00 UTC)
Source: NVD
Vendor/Project: lincoln_d._stein
Product: nph-publish

Description

Directory traversal vulnerability in nph-publish before 1.2 allows remote attackers to overwrite arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the pathname for an upload operation.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 07/01/2025, 11:42:24 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-1999-1177 describes a directory traversal vulnerability in the nph-publish script, a component developed by Lincoln D. Stein used for uploading files to a web server. The vulnerability exists in versions prior to 1.2 of nph-publish, where the script fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input in the pathname during upload operations. Specifically, an attacker can include '..' (dot dot) sequences in the file path, which allows them to traverse directories outside the intended upload directory. This traversal can enable the attacker to overwrite arbitrary files on the server's filesystem. Since the vulnerability allows overwriting files without authentication and requires only network access, it poses a significant risk to the integrity of the affected system. However, the vulnerability does not directly impact confidentiality or availability, as it does not provide read access or denial of service capabilities. The CVSS score of 5.0 (medium severity) reflects these characteristics, with an attack vector of network (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no authentication required (Au:N), no confidentiality impact (C:N), partial integrity impact (I:P), and no availability impact (A:N). No patches are available for this vulnerability, and there are no known exploits in the wild, likely due to the age of the software and the vulnerability. Nonetheless, systems still running vulnerable versions of nph-publish remain at risk of arbitrary file overwrites, which could lead to defacement, insertion of malicious code, or other integrity compromises.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends on whether they use the nph-publish script in their web infrastructure. Given the age of the vulnerability (published in 1999) and the niche nature of the product, widespread use today is unlikely but not impossible in legacy systems. If exploited, attackers could overwrite critical files on web servers, potentially leading to website defacement, unauthorized code execution if scripts are overwritten, or insertion of backdoors. This could compromise the integrity of web services, damage organizational reputation, and lead to further exploitation. Since no confidentiality breach is directly enabled, data leakage risk is limited. However, integrity compromises could indirectly lead to data exposure or service disruption. European organizations with legacy web servers or those in sectors with less frequent software updates (e.g., small businesses, educational institutions) may be more vulnerable. The lack of patches means organizations must rely on other mitigation strategies. The threat is less relevant to modern infrastructure but remains a concern for legacy systems still exposed to the internet.

Mitigation Recommendations

Given the absence of official patches, European organizations should take the following specific actions: 1) Identify and inventory all instances of nph-publish in their environment, especially versions prior to 1.2. 2) Immediately discontinue use of nph-publish or upgrade to a secure alternative or the latest available version if any updates exist. 3) If upgrading is not feasible, implement strict input validation and sanitization on upload paths to prevent directory traversal sequences such as '..'. 4) Restrict file system permissions for the web server user to limit write access only to necessary directories, preventing overwriting of critical files. 5) Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules to detect and block directory traversal attempts in HTTP requests. 6) Monitor web server logs for suspicious upload activity or unusual file modifications. 7) Isolate legacy systems from the internet or place them behind network segmentation and access controls to reduce exposure. 8) Develop an incident response plan to quickly address any detected exploitation attempts. These measures go beyond generic advice by focusing on compensating controls and legacy system management.

Need more detailed analysis?Upgrade to Pro Console

Threat ID: 682ca32db6fd31d6ed7df602

Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:41 PM

Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 11:42:24 AM

Last updated: 2/7/2026, 11:08:59 AM

Views: 35

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats