CVE-1999-1187: Pine before version 3.94 allows local users to gain privileges via a symlink attack on a lockfile th
Pine before version 3.94 allows local users to gain privileges via a symlink attack on a lockfile that is created when a user receives new mail.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-1187 is a local privilege escalation vulnerability affecting Pine, a text-based email client developed by the University of Washington, specifically versions prior to 3.94 (including 2.1.0 and 3.0). The vulnerability arises from the way Pine handles lockfiles when a user receives new mail. Pine creates a lockfile to prevent concurrent access issues; however, it does not securely handle the creation of this lockfile. An attacker with local access can exploit this by creating a symbolic link (symlink) pointing the lockfile to an arbitrary file. When Pine writes to the lockfile, it inadvertently overwrites or modifies the target file of the symlink with elevated privileges. This can lead to unauthorized modification of critical system files or user data, effectively allowing the attacker to gain higher privileges on the system. The vulnerability requires local access, does not require user interaction beyond the attacker’s own actions, and has a CVSS v2 base score of 4.6, indicating medium severity. No patch is available for this vulnerability, and there are no known exploits in the wild documented. Given the age of the vulnerability (published in 1996) and the obsolescence of Pine in modern environments, active exploitation is unlikely but remains a risk in legacy systems still running vulnerable versions.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability primarily concerns legacy systems still running outdated versions of Pine, particularly in environments where local user accounts are shared or less strictly controlled, such as academic institutions or older government and enterprise systems. Exploitation could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges, potentially leading to unauthorized access to sensitive information, modification of system files, or disruption of mail services. This could compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability of affected systems. Although modern systems rarely use Pine, organizations with legacy Unix/Linux mail clients may still be exposed. The risk is compounded in environments with lax local user account management or where attackers can gain initial local access through other means. The vulnerability does not pose a direct remote threat but can be leveraged as part of a multi-stage attack.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given that no official patch is available for this vulnerability, European organizations should prioritize the following mitigations: 1) Upgrade or replace Pine with a modern, actively maintained email client that does not have this vulnerability. 2) Restrict local user access strictly, ensuring that only trusted users have accounts on systems running Pine. 3) Implement strict file system permissions and mount options (e.g., noexec, nosymfollow where possible) to limit the ability to create or follow symlinks in directories where Pine creates lockfiles. 4) Monitor and audit file system changes and lockfile creation directories for suspicious symlink activity. 5) Employ host-based intrusion detection systems (HIDS) to detect unusual privilege escalation attempts. 6) For legacy systems that cannot be upgraded immediately, consider isolating them from critical networks and sensitive data to minimize impact.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Poland
CVE-1999-1187: Pine before version 3.94 allows local users to gain privileges via a symlink attack on a lockfile th
Description
Pine before version 3.94 allows local users to gain privileges via a symlink attack on a lockfile that is created when a user receives new mail.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-1187 is a local privilege escalation vulnerability affecting Pine, a text-based email client developed by the University of Washington, specifically versions prior to 3.94 (including 2.1.0 and 3.0). The vulnerability arises from the way Pine handles lockfiles when a user receives new mail. Pine creates a lockfile to prevent concurrent access issues; however, it does not securely handle the creation of this lockfile. An attacker with local access can exploit this by creating a symbolic link (symlink) pointing the lockfile to an arbitrary file. When Pine writes to the lockfile, it inadvertently overwrites or modifies the target file of the symlink with elevated privileges. This can lead to unauthorized modification of critical system files or user data, effectively allowing the attacker to gain higher privileges on the system. The vulnerability requires local access, does not require user interaction beyond the attacker’s own actions, and has a CVSS v2 base score of 4.6, indicating medium severity. No patch is available for this vulnerability, and there are no known exploits in the wild documented. Given the age of the vulnerability (published in 1996) and the obsolescence of Pine in modern environments, active exploitation is unlikely but remains a risk in legacy systems still running vulnerable versions.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability primarily concerns legacy systems still running outdated versions of Pine, particularly in environments where local user accounts are shared or less strictly controlled, such as academic institutions or older government and enterprise systems. Exploitation could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges, potentially leading to unauthorized access to sensitive information, modification of system files, or disruption of mail services. This could compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability of affected systems. Although modern systems rarely use Pine, organizations with legacy Unix/Linux mail clients may still be exposed. The risk is compounded in environments with lax local user account management or where attackers can gain initial local access through other means. The vulnerability does not pose a direct remote threat but can be leveraged as part of a multi-stage attack.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given that no official patch is available for this vulnerability, European organizations should prioritize the following mitigations: 1) Upgrade or replace Pine with a modern, actively maintained email client that does not have this vulnerability. 2) Restrict local user access strictly, ensuring that only trusted users have accounts on systems running Pine. 3) Implement strict file system permissions and mount options (e.g., noexec, nosymfollow where possible) to limit the ability to create or follow symlinks in directories where Pine creates lockfiles. 4) Monitor and audit file system changes and lockfile creation directories for suspicious symlink activity. 5) Employ host-based intrusion detection systems (HIDS) to detect unusual privilege escalation attempts. 6) For legacy systems that cannot be upgraded immediately, consider isolating them from critical networks and sensitive data to minimize impact.
Affected Countries
Threat ID: 682ca32ab6fd31d6ed7de514
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:38 PM
Last enriched: 7/2/2025, 12:43:04 AM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 3:06:44 AM
Views: 34
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-2069: Stack-based Buffer Overflow in ggml-org llama.cpp
MediumCVE-2026-25760: CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in BishopFox sliver
MediumCVE-2026-25574: CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in payloadcms payload
MediumCVE-2026-25516: CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in zauberzeug nicegui
MediumCVE-2026-25581: CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in samclarke SCEditor
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.