Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-1999-1225: rpc.mountd on Linux, Ultrix, and possibly other operating systems, allows remote attackers to determ

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-1999-1225cve-1999-1225
Published: Sun Aug 24 1997 (08/24/1997, 04:00:00 UTC)
Source: NVD
Vendor/Project: digital
Product: ultrix

Description

rpc.mountd on Linux, Ultrix, and possibly other operating systems, allows remote attackers to determine the existence of a file on the server by attempting to mount that file, which generates different error messages depending on whether the file exists or not.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 07/01/2025, 23:26:30 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-1999-1225 is a vulnerability found in the rpc.mountd service on Linux, Ultrix, and potentially other Unix-like operating systems. The rpc.mountd daemon is responsible for handling mount requests in the Network File System (NFS) protocol, allowing clients to mount remote file systems. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to determine the existence of files on the server by attempting to mount a file or directory. The server responds with different error messages depending on whether the requested file or directory exists or not. This side-channel information leak does not require authentication or user interaction and can be exploited remotely over the network. The vulnerability impacts confidentiality by allowing attackers to enumerate files and directories on the server, potentially aiding in further reconnaissance and targeted attacks. The CVSS score of 5.0 (medium severity) reflects that the attack vector is network-based, requires no authentication, and impacts confidentiality only, without affecting integrity or availability. No patches are available for this vulnerability, and there are no known exploits in the wild. However, given the age of the vulnerability (published in 1997) and the limited scope of affected systems, it remains relevant primarily in legacy or unmaintained environments still running vulnerable versions of rpc.mountd or Ultrix systems. The affected versions listed include Linux kernel 2.6.20.1 and Ultrix 2.0.4, both quite outdated. Modern Linux distributions have since replaced or secured rpc.mountd implementations, but legacy systems may still be exposed.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-1999-1225 is the potential leakage of sensitive file existence information on vulnerable NFS servers. This reconnaissance capability can facilitate more targeted attacks, such as privilege escalation or data exfiltration, especially in environments where NFS shares contain sensitive or critical data. Although the vulnerability does not allow direct file access or modification, the confidentiality breach can undermine security postures, particularly in sectors handling sensitive information like finance, healthcare, or government. Organizations running legacy Unix or Linux systems with outdated rpc.mountd services are at risk. The impact is mitigated in modern environments due to updated software and hardened configurations. However, in industrial control systems, research institutions, or legacy infrastructure still in use in Europe, this vulnerability could be exploited by attackers to map file structures and plan further intrusions.

Mitigation Recommendations

Since no official patches are available for this vulnerability, European organizations should focus on compensating controls and best practices: 1) Disable or restrict rpc.mountd service if NFS mounts are not required, especially on publicly accessible interfaces. 2) Use firewall rules to limit access to NFS-related ports (typically port 111 for rpcbind and port 2049 for NFS) to trusted internal networks only. 3) Upgrade legacy systems to modern Linux distributions or Unix variants with updated rpc.mountd implementations that do not leak file existence information. 4) Employ network segmentation to isolate legacy NFS servers from general user networks. 5) Monitor network traffic for unusual mount requests or error message patterns that could indicate reconnaissance attempts. 6) Consider migrating from NFS to more secure file sharing protocols with stronger authentication and encryption. 7) Conduct regular security audits of legacy systems to identify and remediate outdated services. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on legacy system management, network access controls, and monitoring tailored to this specific vulnerability.

Need more detailed analysis?Upgrade to Pro Console

Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7de7a9

Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM

Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 11:26:30 PM

Last updated: 2/7/2026, 10:24:40 AM

Views: 37

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats