CVE-1999-1314: Vulnerability in union file system in FreeBSD 2.2 and earlier, and possibly other operating systems,
Vulnerability in union file system in FreeBSD 2.2 and earlier, and possibly other operating systems, allows local users to cause a denial of service (system reload) via a series of certain mount_union commands.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-1314 is a vulnerability identified in the union file system implementation of FreeBSD versions 2.2 and earlier, potentially affecting other operating systems with similar union file system features. The union file system allows multiple file systems to be overlaid, presenting a unified view. The vulnerability arises from improper handling of mount_union commands, which local users can exploit by issuing a specific sequence of these commands. This exploitation leads to a denial of service (DoS) condition by causing the system to reload or crash. The vulnerability requires local access, meaning an attacker must have some level of access to the system to execute the attack. The CVSS score of 2.1 (low severity) reflects the limited impact scope—only availability is affected, with no confidentiality or integrity compromise, and no authentication is required beyond local user access. Given the age of the vulnerability (published in 1996) and the affected FreeBSD versions being very old and obsolete, modern systems are not impacted. No patches are available, but the practical risk is minimal today due to the obsolescence of the affected versions and the lack of known exploits in the wild.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the direct impact of this vulnerability today is negligible. The affected FreeBSD versions (2.0 through 2.2) are decades old and unlikely to be in operational use within enterprise or critical infrastructure environments. However, if legacy systems running these versions are still in use—such as in research, embedded systems, or specialized legacy environments—there is a risk of local denial of service, which could disrupt operations or require system reboots. The vulnerability does not allow remote exploitation or data compromise, limiting its threat profile. Organizations relying on FreeBSD should ensure they are running supported, updated versions to avoid any residual risk. The vulnerability's low severity and local access requirement mean it is unlikely to be a vector for widespread attacks or targeted campaigns in Europe.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given the absence of patches and the obsolescence of the affected FreeBSD versions, the primary mitigation is to upgrade to a supported and actively maintained FreeBSD release. Organizations should conduct an inventory to identify any legacy systems running these old versions and plan for their decommissioning or upgrade. For environments where upgrading is not immediately feasible, restricting local user access and implementing strict access controls can reduce the risk of exploitation. Additionally, monitoring system logs for unusual mount_union command activity may help detect attempted exploitation. Employing system integrity monitoring and ensuring that only trusted users have shell access will further mitigate risk. Finally, organizations should maintain a robust patch management and system lifecycle policy to avoid running unsupported software with known vulnerabilities.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland
CVE-1999-1314: Vulnerability in union file system in FreeBSD 2.2 and earlier, and possibly other operating systems,
Description
Vulnerability in union file system in FreeBSD 2.2 and earlier, and possibly other operating systems, allows local users to cause a denial of service (system reload) via a series of certain mount_union commands.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-1314 is a vulnerability identified in the union file system implementation of FreeBSD versions 2.2 and earlier, potentially affecting other operating systems with similar union file system features. The union file system allows multiple file systems to be overlaid, presenting a unified view. The vulnerability arises from improper handling of mount_union commands, which local users can exploit by issuing a specific sequence of these commands. This exploitation leads to a denial of service (DoS) condition by causing the system to reload or crash. The vulnerability requires local access, meaning an attacker must have some level of access to the system to execute the attack. The CVSS score of 2.1 (low severity) reflects the limited impact scope—only availability is affected, with no confidentiality or integrity compromise, and no authentication is required beyond local user access. Given the age of the vulnerability (published in 1996) and the affected FreeBSD versions being very old and obsolete, modern systems are not impacted. No patches are available, but the practical risk is minimal today due to the obsolescence of the affected versions and the lack of known exploits in the wild.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the direct impact of this vulnerability today is negligible. The affected FreeBSD versions (2.0 through 2.2) are decades old and unlikely to be in operational use within enterprise or critical infrastructure environments. However, if legacy systems running these versions are still in use—such as in research, embedded systems, or specialized legacy environments—there is a risk of local denial of service, which could disrupt operations or require system reboots. The vulnerability does not allow remote exploitation or data compromise, limiting its threat profile. Organizations relying on FreeBSD should ensure they are running supported, updated versions to avoid any residual risk. The vulnerability's low severity and local access requirement mean it is unlikely to be a vector for widespread attacks or targeted campaigns in Europe.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given the absence of patches and the obsolescence of the affected FreeBSD versions, the primary mitigation is to upgrade to a supported and actively maintained FreeBSD release. Organizations should conduct an inventory to identify any legacy systems running these old versions and plan for their decommissioning or upgrade. For environments where upgrading is not immediately feasible, restricting local user access and implementing strict access controls can reduce the risk of exploitation. Additionally, monitoring system logs for unusual mount_union command activity may help detect attempted exploitation. Employing system integrity monitoring and ensuring that only trusted users have shell access will further mitigate risk. Finally, organizations should maintain a robust patch management and system lifecycle policy to avoid running unsupported software with known vulnerabilities.
Affected Countries
Threat ID: 682ca32ab6fd31d6ed7de4d4
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:38 PM
Last enriched: 7/2/2025, 12:55:36 AM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 1:02:53 PM
Views: 34
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-25764: CWE-80: Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) in opf openproject
LowCVE-2026-25729: CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization in lintsinghua DeepAudit
LowCVE-2025-15320: Multiple Binds to the Same Port in Tanium Tanium Client
LowCVE-2026-25724: CWE-61: UNIX Symbolic Link (Symlink) Following in anthropics claude-code
LowCVE-2026-1337: CWE-117 Improper Output Neutralization for Logs in neo4j Enterprise Edition
LowActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.