CVE-1999-1530: cgiwrap as used on Cobalt RaQ 2.0 and RaQ 3i does not properly identify the user for running certain
cgiwrap as used on Cobalt RaQ 2.0 and RaQ 3i does not properly identify the user for running certain scripts, which allows a malicious site administrator to view or modify data located at another virtual site on the same system.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-1530 is a vulnerability affecting the cgiwrap utility as implemented on Cobalt RaQ 2.0 and RaQ 3i server appliances. The core issue lies in cgiwrap's failure to correctly identify the user context under which certain CGI scripts are executed. Normally, cgiwrap is designed to run CGI scripts with the permissions of the virtual site owner, thereby isolating each virtual host on a shared system. However, due to improper user identification, a malicious site administrator on one virtual site can execute scripts that access or modify data belonging to other virtual sites hosted on the same physical server. This vulnerability allows unauthorized cross-site data access and modification within the same server environment. The vulnerability does not require authentication and can be exploited locally by a site administrator. The CVSS score is 3.6 (low severity) with vector AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N, indicating local access with low complexity, no authentication required, and partial confidentiality and integrity impact but no availability impact. There are no patches available, and no known exploits have been reported in the wild. Given the age of the vulnerability (published in 1999) and the specific affected products (Cobalt RaQ 2.0 and 3i), which are legacy server appliances, this vulnerability is primarily relevant in legacy or niche environments still running these systems.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends on whether they still operate legacy Cobalt RaQ 2.0 or 3i appliances in multi-tenant hosting environments. If such systems are in use, a malicious site administrator could leverage this flaw to access or alter data from other virtual sites on the same server, potentially leading to data breaches, unauthorized data modification, and loss of data confidentiality and integrity. This could affect customer trust, regulatory compliance (e.g., GDPR), and lead to reputational damage. However, given the obsolescence of the affected products and the lack of known exploits, the practical risk is low for most organizations. Nonetheless, any legacy hosting providers or organizations using these appliances in Europe should consider the risk seriously, especially if they host sensitive or regulated data.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no official patches are available, mitigation should focus on compensating controls. Organizations should: 1) Immediately identify and inventory any Cobalt RaQ 2.0 or 3i systems in their environment. 2) Isolate these legacy appliances from sensitive networks and data to limit exposure. 3) Restrict administrative access strictly to trusted personnel and monitor administrative activities closely. 4) Consider migrating hosted sites and services off these legacy appliances to modern, supported platforms that provide proper user isolation and security controls. 5) Implement file system permissions and access controls at the OS level to further restrict cross-site data access if migration is not immediately feasible. 6) Employ network segmentation and monitoring to detect any unusual access patterns. 7) Regularly audit virtual site configurations to ensure no unauthorized privilege escalation is possible.
Affected Countries
United Kingdom, Germany, France, Netherlands, Italy, Spain
CVE-1999-1530: cgiwrap as used on Cobalt RaQ 2.0 and RaQ 3i does not properly identify the user for running certain
Description
cgiwrap as used on Cobalt RaQ 2.0 and RaQ 3i does not properly identify the user for running certain scripts, which allows a malicious site administrator to view or modify data located at another virtual site on the same system.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-1530 is a vulnerability affecting the cgiwrap utility as implemented on Cobalt RaQ 2.0 and RaQ 3i server appliances. The core issue lies in cgiwrap's failure to correctly identify the user context under which certain CGI scripts are executed. Normally, cgiwrap is designed to run CGI scripts with the permissions of the virtual site owner, thereby isolating each virtual host on a shared system. However, due to improper user identification, a malicious site administrator on one virtual site can execute scripts that access or modify data belonging to other virtual sites hosted on the same physical server. This vulnerability allows unauthorized cross-site data access and modification within the same server environment. The vulnerability does not require authentication and can be exploited locally by a site administrator. The CVSS score is 3.6 (low severity) with vector AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N, indicating local access with low complexity, no authentication required, and partial confidentiality and integrity impact but no availability impact. There are no patches available, and no known exploits have been reported in the wild. Given the age of the vulnerability (published in 1999) and the specific affected products (Cobalt RaQ 2.0 and 3i), which are legacy server appliances, this vulnerability is primarily relevant in legacy or niche environments still running these systems.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends on whether they still operate legacy Cobalt RaQ 2.0 or 3i appliances in multi-tenant hosting environments. If such systems are in use, a malicious site administrator could leverage this flaw to access or alter data from other virtual sites on the same server, potentially leading to data breaches, unauthorized data modification, and loss of data confidentiality and integrity. This could affect customer trust, regulatory compliance (e.g., GDPR), and lead to reputational damage. However, given the obsolescence of the affected products and the lack of known exploits, the practical risk is low for most organizations. Nonetheless, any legacy hosting providers or organizations using these appliances in Europe should consider the risk seriously, especially if they host sensitive or regulated data.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no official patches are available, mitigation should focus on compensating controls. Organizations should: 1) Immediately identify and inventory any Cobalt RaQ 2.0 or 3i systems in their environment. 2) Isolate these legacy appliances from sensitive networks and data to limit exposure. 3) Restrict administrative access strictly to trusted personnel and monitor administrative activities closely. 4) Consider migrating hosted sites and services off these legacy appliances to modern, supported platforms that provide proper user isolation and security controls. 5) Implement file system permissions and access controls at the OS level to further restrict cross-site data access if migration is not immediately feasible. 6) Employ network segmentation and monitoring to detect any unusual access patterns. 7) Regularly audit virtual site configurations to ensure no unauthorized privilege escalation is possible.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Threat ID: 682ca32cb6fd31d6ed7df3b5
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:40 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 1:57:55 PM
Last updated: 7/31/2025, 2:13:34 PM
Views: 10
Related Threats
CVE-2025-9091: Hard-coded Credentials in Tenda AC20
LowCVE-2025-9092: CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. Bouncy Castle for Java - BC-FJA 2.1.0
LowCVE-2025-9019: Heap-based Buffer Overflow in tcpreplay
LowCVE-2025-9020: Use After Free in PX4 PX4-Autopilot
LowCVE-2025-8013: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in quttera Quttera Web Malware Scanner
LowActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.