CVE-1999-1540: shell-lock in Cactus Software Shell Lock uses weak encryption (trivial encoding) which allows attack
shell-lock in Cactus Software Shell Lock uses weak encryption (trivial encoding) which allows attackers to easily decrypt and obtain the source code.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-1540 describes a vulnerability in the Shell Lock product developed by Cactus Software. The core issue lies in the use of weak encryption, described as trivial encoding, to protect the source code within the Shell Lock software. This weak encryption allows attackers to easily decrypt the encoded data and obtain the original source code. The vulnerability is classified with a low CVSS score of 2.1, indicating limited impact and exploitability. The attack vector is local (AV:L), requiring low attack complexity (AC:L), no authentication (Au:N), and results in partial confidentiality impact (C:P) without affecting integrity or availability. Since the encryption is weak, an attacker with local access can trivially decode the source code, potentially revealing proprietary or sensitive implementation details. However, there is no indication that this vulnerability allows remote code execution or direct system compromise. No patches are available, and no known exploits have been reported in the wild. Given the age of this vulnerability (published in 1999) and the specific product involved, it is likely of limited relevance in modern environments but may still pose a risk in legacy systems using this software.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the direct impact of this vulnerability is relatively low due to its local attack vector and limited confidentiality impact. However, organizations that still use legacy systems running Cactus Software's Shell Lock could face intellectual property exposure if an attacker gains local access. Disclosure of source code could facilitate further attacks or reverse engineering, potentially leading to exploitation of other vulnerabilities. The lack of patches means organizations must rely on compensating controls. The vulnerability does not directly compromise system integrity or availability, so operational disruption is unlikely. Overall, the impact is mainly on confidentiality of proprietary code rather than critical business functions or personal data.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given the absence of patches, European organizations should focus on mitigating the risk through operational and procedural controls. These include restricting local access to systems running Shell Lock to trusted personnel only, implementing strict access controls and monitoring for unauthorized access attempts. Organizations should consider isolating legacy systems from critical networks to reduce exposure. If possible, migrating away from Shell Lock to modern, supported software with robust encryption and security features is strongly recommended. Additionally, organizations should conduct regular audits to identify any use of this legacy software and assess associated risks. Employing host-based intrusion detection systems (HIDS) can help detect suspicious local activities that might indicate attempts to exploit this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands
CVE-1999-1540: shell-lock in Cactus Software Shell Lock uses weak encryption (trivial encoding) which allows attack
Description
shell-lock in Cactus Software Shell Lock uses weak encryption (trivial encoding) which allows attackers to easily decrypt and obtain the source code.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-1540 describes a vulnerability in the Shell Lock product developed by Cactus Software. The core issue lies in the use of weak encryption, described as trivial encoding, to protect the source code within the Shell Lock software. This weak encryption allows attackers to easily decrypt the encoded data and obtain the original source code. The vulnerability is classified with a low CVSS score of 2.1, indicating limited impact and exploitability. The attack vector is local (AV:L), requiring low attack complexity (AC:L), no authentication (Au:N), and results in partial confidentiality impact (C:P) without affecting integrity or availability. Since the encryption is weak, an attacker with local access can trivially decode the source code, potentially revealing proprietary or sensitive implementation details. However, there is no indication that this vulnerability allows remote code execution or direct system compromise. No patches are available, and no known exploits have been reported in the wild. Given the age of this vulnerability (published in 1999) and the specific product involved, it is likely of limited relevance in modern environments but may still pose a risk in legacy systems using this software.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the direct impact of this vulnerability is relatively low due to its local attack vector and limited confidentiality impact. However, organizations that still use legacy systems running Cactus Software's Shell Lock could face intellectual property exposure if an attacker gains local access. Disclosure of source code could facilitate further attacks or reverse engineering, potentially leading to exploitation of other vulnerabilities. The lack of patches means organizations must rely on compensating controls. The vulnerability does not directly compromise system integrity or availability, so operational disruption is unlikely. Overall, the impact is mainly on confidentiality of proprietary code rather than critical business functions or personal data.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given the absence of patches, European organizations should focus on mitigating the risk through operational and procedural controls. These include restricting local access to systems running Shell Lock to trusted personnel only, implementing strict access controls and monitoring for unauthorized access attempts. Organizations should consider isolating legacy systems from critical networks to reduce exposure. If possible, migrating away from Shell Lock to modern, supported software with robust encryption and security features is strongly recommended. Additionally, organizations should conduct regular audits to identify any use of this legacy software and assess associated risks. Employing host-based intrusion detection systems (HIDS) can help detect suspicious local activities that might indicate attempts to exploit this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Threat ID: 682ca32cb6fd31d6ed7df2cd
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:40 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 2:55:58 PM
Last updated: 8/2/2025, 4:21:08 AM
Views: 11
Related Threats
Hacked Law Enforcement and Government Email Accounts Sold on Dark Web
HighCVE-2025-36613: CWE-266: Incorrect Privilege Assignment in Dell SupportAssist for Home PCs
LowCVE-2025-36581: CWE-788: Access of Memory Location After End of Buffer in Dell PowerEdge
LowCVE-2025-8713: Exposure of Sensitive Information Through Metadata in PostgreSQL
LowAugust News and Resources Catch Up (French)
CriticalActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.