CVE-1999-1566: Buffer overflow in iParty server 1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of servic
Buffer overflow in iParty server 1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) by connecting to default port 6004 and sending repeated extended characters.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-1566 describes a buffer overflow vulnerability in the iParty server version 1.2 and earlier, a product developed by Intel. The vulnerability arises when a remote attacker connects to the server's default listening port 6004 and sends repeated extended characters. This input causes a buffer overflow condition, which leads to a denial of service (DoS) by crashing the server. The vulnerability does not require authentication or user interaction and can be exploited remotely over the network. The attack vector is network-based (AV:N), with low attack complexity (AC:L), no authentication required (Au:N), and impacts only availability (A:P) without affecting confidentiality or integrity. Since the vulnerability dates back to 1999 and affects legacy software, no patches are available, and there are no known exploits in the wild currently. The iParty server was used for network communication and collaboration, but given the age of the software, it is likely obsolete or replaced in most environments. However, any legacy systems still running iParty server 1.2 or earlier remain vulnerable to remote DoS attacks that can disrupt services by crashing the server process.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability is the potential for denial of service on systems running the affected iParty server software. This could disrupt internal communications or collaboration services relying on iParty, leading to operational downtime and productivity loss. Since the vulnerability does not compromise confidentiality or integrity, the risk is limited to availability. However, in critical infrastructure or industrial environments where legacy systems might still be in use, such a DoS could have cascading effects on dependent systems or processes. The lack of patches means organizations must rely on mitigating controls or system upgrades. Given the age of the vulnerability, it is unlikely to be a widespread threat today, but any legacy deployments in European organizations could be targeted by opportunistic attackers aiming to disrupt services.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no patches are available for this vulnerability, European organizations should focus on the following practical mitigations: 1) Identify and inventory any legacy systems running iParty server 1.2 or earlier. 2) Decommission or upgrade these systems to supported, secure alternatives to eliminate exposure. 3) If immediate upgrade is not feasible, restrict network access to port 6004 using firewalls or network segmentation to prevent unauthorized remote connections. 4) Monitor network traffic for unusual activity targeting port 6004, especially repeated extended character sequences indicative of exploitation attempts. 5) Implement intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) with signatures or anomaly detection to block or alert on suspicious traffic patterns. 6) Maintain robust incident response plans to quickly address any DoS incidents affecting critical services. These steps go beyond generic advice by emphasizing legacy system management, network controls specific to the vulnerable port, and active monitoring tailored to the vulnerability's exploitation method.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands
CVE-1999-1566: Buffer overflow in iParty server 1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of servic
Description
Buffer overflow in iParty server 1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) by connecting to default port 6004 and sending repeated extended characters.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-1566 describes a buffer overflow vulnerability in the iParty server version 1.2 and earlier, a product developed by Intel. The vulnerability arises when a remote attacker connects to the server's default listening port 6004 and sends repeated extended characters. This input causes a buffer overflow condition, which leads to a denial of service (DoS) by crashing the server. The vulnerability does not require authentication or user interaction and can be exploited remotely over the network. The attack vector is network-based (AV:N), with low attack complexity (AC:L), no authentication required (Au:N), and impacts only availability (A:P) without affecting confidentiality or integrity. Since the vulnerability dates back to 1999 and affects legacy software, no patches are available, and there are no known exploits in the wild currently. The iParty server was used for network communication and collaboration, but given the age of the software, it is likely obsolete or replaced in most environments. However, any legacy systems still running iParty server 1.2 or earlier remain vulnerable to remote DoS attacks that can disrupt services by crashing the server process.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability is the potential for denial of service on systems running the affected iParty server software. This could disrupt internal communications or collaboration services relying on iParty, leading to operational downtime and productivity loss. Since the vulnerability does not compromise confidentiality or integrity, the risk is limited to availability. However, in critical infrastructure or industrial environments where legacy systems might still be in use, such a DoS could have cascading effects on dependent systems or processes. The lack of patches means organizations must rely on mitigating controls or system upgrades. Given the age of the vulnerability, it is unlikely to be a widespread threat today, but any legacy deployments in European organizations could be targeted by opportunistic attackers aiming to disrupt services.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no patches are available for this vulnerability, European organizations should focus on the following practical mitigations: 1) Identify and inventory any legacy systems running iParty server 1.2 or earlier. 2) Decommission or upgrade these systems to supported, secure alternatives to eliminate exposure. 3) If immediate upgrade is not feasible, restrict network access to port 6004 using firewalls or network segmentation to prevent unauthorized remote connections. 4) Monitor network traffic for unusual activity targeting port 6004, especially repeated extended character sequences indicative of exploitation attempts. 5) Implement intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) with signatures or anomaly detection to block or alert on suspicious traffic patterns. 6) Maintain robust incident response plans to quickly address any DoS incidents affecting critical services. These steps go beyond generic advice by emphasizing legacy system management, network controls specific to the vulnerable port, and active monitoring tailored to the vulnerability's exploitation method.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Threat ID: 682ca32cb6fd31d6ed7defdf
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:40 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 5:57:15 PM
Last updated: 7/29/2025, 1:30:14 PM
Views: 11
Related Threats
CVE-2025-9026: OS Command Injection in D-Link DIR-860L
MediumCVE-2025-9025: SQL Injection in code-projects Simple Cafe Ordering System
MediumCVE-2025-9024: SQL Injection in PHPGurukul Beauty Parlour Management System
MediumCVE-2025-8905: CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') in inpersttion Inpersttion For Theme
MediumCVE-2025-8720: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in morehawes Plugin README Parser
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.