CVE-1999-1592: Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in sendmail 5, as installed on Sun SunOS 4.1.3_U1 and 4.1.4, ha
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in sendmail 5, as installed on Sun SunOS 4.1.3_U1 and 4.1.4, have unspecified attack vectors and impact. NOTE: this might overlap CVE-1999-0129.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-1592 refers to multiple unspecified vulnerabilities found in the sendmail 5 mail transfer agent as installed on Sun Microsystems' SunOS operating system versions 4.1.3_U1 and 4.1.4. Sendmail is a widely used mail routing software responsible for sending, receiving, and relaying email messages. The vulnerabilities are unspecified in detail but are known to affect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the system, as indicated by the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P). This means the vulnerabilities can be exploited remotely over the network without any authentication, with low attack complexity, and can lead to partial or full compromise of data confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The note that this might overlap with CVE-1999-0129 suggests some commonality or related issues in the sendmail versions on these SunOS releases. Given the age of the affected software (SunOS 4.1.3_U1 and 4.1.4 are legacy UNIX operating systems from the 1990s), these vulnerabilities likely stem from design and implementation flaws in sendmail 5, which was known historically for security weaknesses. No patches are available, and no known exploits in the wild have been documented, but the high CVSS score of 7.5 indicates a significant risk if such systems are still operational and exposed to untrusted networks. The vulnerabilities could allow attackers to remotely execute arbitrary code, intercept or modify email communications, or cause denial of service conditions on affected systems.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of these vulnerabilities depends largely on the continued use of legacy SunOS systems running sendmail 5. While most modern infrastructures have migrated away from these outdated platforms, some critical legacy systems in sectors such as telecommunications, industrial control, or government archives may still be operational. Exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive email communications, disruption of email services, and potential lateral movement within networks. This could compromise confidential business information, disrupt communication channels, and damage organizational reputation. Additionally, given the remote and unauthenticated nature of the vulnerabilities, attackers could exploit these flaws without insider access, increasing the risk profile. The lack of available patches means organizations must rely on compensating controls to mitigate risk. The vulnerabilities also pose a risk to the integrity of email routing, potentially enabling attackers to spoof or redirect emails, which could facilitate phishing or further intrusion attempts.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no official patches are available for these vulnerabilities, European organizations should prioritize the following specific mitigation strategies: 1) Immediate identification and inventory of any legacy SunOS 4.1.3_U1 or 4.1.4 systems running sendmail 5 within the network. 2) Segmentation and isolation of these legacy systems from the internet and untrusted networks to prevent remote exploitation. 3) Deployment of network-level filtering to block SMTP traffic to and from these legacy systems unless absolutely necessary. 4) Implementation of strict access controls and monitoring on these systems, including logging of all email-related activities and network connections. 5) Where possible, migration or upgrade plans should be accelerated to replace these legacy systems with modern, supported mail servers and operating systems. 6) Use of intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) tuned to detect anomalous sendmail traffic patterns or known exploit signatures related to sendmail vulnerabilities. 7) Conduct regular security audits and penetration tests focusing on legacy infrastructure to identify and remediate potential exposure. 8) Employee awareness training to recognize phishing attempts that might leverage compromised mail infrastructure. These measures go beyond generic advice by focusing on legacy system identification, network isolation, and compensating controls tailored to the absence of patches.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands
CVE-1999-1592: Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in sendmail 5, as installed on Sun SunOS 4.1.3_U1 and 4.1.4, ha
Description
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in sendmail 5, as installed on Sun SunOS 4.1.3_U1 and 4.1.4, have unspecified attack vectors and impact. NOTE: this might overlap CVE-1999-0129.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-1592 refers to multiple unspecified vulnerabilities found in the sendmail 5 mail transfer agent as installed on Sun Microsystems' SunOS operating system versions 4.1.3_U1 and 4.1.4. Sendmail is a widely used mail routing software responsible for sending, receiving, and relaying email messages. The vulnerabilities are unspecified in detail but are known to affect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the system, as indicated by the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P). This means the vulnerabilities can be exploited remotely over the network without any authentication, with low attack complexity, and can lead to partial or full compromise of data confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The note that this might overlap with CVE-1999-0129 suggests some commonality or related issues in the sendmail versions on these SunOS releases. Given the age of the affected software (SunOS 4.1.3_U1 and 4.1.4 are legacy UNIX operating systems from the 1990s), these vulnerabilities likely stem from design and implementation flaws in sendmail 5, which was known historically for security weaknesses. No patches are available, and no known exploits in the wild have been documented, but the high CVSS score of 7.5 indicates a significant risk if such systems are still operational and exposed to untrusted networks. The vulnerabilities could allow attackers to remotely execute arbitrary code, intercept or modify email communications, or cause denial of service conditions on affected systems.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of these vulnerabilities depends largely on the continued use of legacy SunOS systems running sendmail 5. While most modern infrastructures have migrated away from these outdated platforms, some critical legacy systems in sectors such as telecommunications, industrial control, or government archives may still be operational. Exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive email communications, disruption of email services, and potential lateral movement within networks. This could compromise confidential business information, disrupt communication channels, and damage organizational reputation. Additionally, given the remote and unauthenticated nature of the vulnerabilities, attackers could exploit these flaws without insider access, increasing the risk profile. The lack of available patches means organizations must rely on compensating controls to mitigate risk. The vulnerabilities also pose a risk to the integrity of email routing, potentially enabling attackers to spoof or redirect emails, which could facilitate phishing or further intrusion attempts.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no official patches are available for these vulnerabilities, European organizations should prioritize the following specific mitigation strategies: 1) Immediate identification and inventory of any legacy SunOS 4.1.3_U1 or 4.1.4 systems running sendmail 5 within the network. 2) Segmentation and isolation of these legacy systems from the internet and untrusted networks to prevent remote exploitation. 3) Deployment of network-level filtering to block SMTP traffic to and from these legacy systems unless absolutely necessary. 4) Implementation of strict access controls and monitoring on these systems, including logging of all email-related activities and network connections. 5) Where possible, migration or upgrade plans should be accelerated to replace these legacy systems with modern, supported mail servers and operating systems. 6) Use of intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) tuned to detect anomalous sendmail traffic patterns or known exploit signatures related to sendmail vulnerabilities. 7) Conduct regular security audits and penetration tests focusing on legacy infrastructure to identify and remediate potential exposure. 8) Employee awareness training to recognize phishing attempts that might leverage compromised mail infrastructure. These measures go beyond generic advice by focusing on legacy system identification, network isolation, and compensating controls tailored to the absence of patches.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Threat ID: 682ca32db6fd31d6ed7df6c2
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:41 PM
Last enriched: 6/25/2025, 3:31:13 PM
Last updated: 7/29/2025, 3:29:47 AM
Views: 9
Related Threats
CVE-2025-50861: n/a
HighCVE-2025-8978: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity in D-Link DIR-619L
HighCVE-2025-51965: n/a
HighCVE-2025-8980: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity in Tenda G1
HighCVE-2025-8979: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity in Tenda AC15
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.