Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2000-0138: A system has a distributed denial of service (DDOS) attack master, agent, or zombie installed, such

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2000-0138cve-2000-0138denial of servicedos
Published: Tue May 02 2000 (05/02/2000, 04:00:00 UTC)
Source: NVD

Description

A system has a distributed denial of service (DDOS) attack master, agent, or zombie installed, such as (1) Trinoo, (2) Tribe Flood Network (TFN), (3) Tribe Flood Network 2000 (TFN2K), (4) stacheldraht, (5) mstream, or (6) shaft.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 06/19/2025, 19:50:37 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2000-0138 describes the presence of distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack components—specifically masters, agents, or zombies—installed on a system. These components are part of well-known early DDoS toolkits such as Trinoo, Tribe Flood Network (TFN), Tribe Flood Network 2000 (TFN2K), stacheldraht, mstream, and shaft. These tools enable attackers to coordinate multiple compromised systems (zombies) to flood a target with overwhelming traffic, thereby disrupting the availability of network services. The vulnerability itself is not a software flaw but rather an indicator that the system has been compromised and is being used as part of a botnet infrastructure to launch DDoS attacks. The CVSS score of 5.0 (medium severity) reflects the impact on availability (A:P), with no impact on confidentiality or integrity, no authentication required, and low attack complexity. Since these tools date back to the early 2000s, they represent legacy threats but remain relevant as foundational DDoS mechanisms. The presence of such malware indicates a compromised host that can be leveraged to amplify attacks against other targets, potentially causing widespread service outages. No patches exist because this is not a software vulnerability but a compromise state. No known exploits in the wild are reported, likely due to the age of these tools and their detection by modern security solutions. However, infected systems can still be used maliciously if not remediated.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the presence of these DDoS attack components on internal systems poses a dual risk. First, infected systems can be used as launch points for attacks against critical infrastructure, financial institutions, government services, or other enterprises, potentially causing significant service disruptions. Second, the compromise itself indicates a failure in endpoint security, which could be symptomatic of broader security weaknesses. DDoS attacks can degrade or deny access to essential services, impacting business continuity, customer trust, and regulatory compliance, especially under GDPR and NIS Directive requirements. European sectors such as finance, telecommunications, energy, and public administration are particularly vulnerable due to their reliance on continuous network availability and their attractiveness as attack targets. Additionally, infected systems may consume excessive bandwidth and resources, impacting operational efficiency. While the direct confidentiality and integrity impacts are minimal, the availability disruption can have cascading effects on dependent services and supply chains.

Mitigation Recommendations

1. Conduct comprehensive network and endpoint scans to detect and isolate systems infected with known DDoS malware such as Trinoo, TFN, TFN2K, stacheldraht, mstream, and shaft. Use updated threat intelligence and signature-based detection tools. 2. Implement strict network segmentation to limit the ability of compromised hosts to communicate with command and control servers or other zombies. 3. Employ advanced intrusion detection and prevention systems (IDS/IPS) capable of recognizing DDoS command and control traffic patterns and anomalous outbound connections. 4. Harden endpoint security by enforcing timely patching, application whitelisting, and restricting administrative privileges to reduce the risk of initial compromise. 5. Monitor network traffic for unusual spikes or patterns indicative of DDoS activity originating from internal hosts. 6. Develop and regularly test incident response plans specifically addressing DDoS infection scenarios, including rapid isolation and remediation procedures. 7. Collaborate with ISPs and upstream providers to implement traffic filtering and rate limiting to mitigate outbound attack traffic. 8. Educate users on phishing and social engineering tactics that often facilitate initial malware installation. 9. Since no patches exist for this compromise state, focus on eradication through malware removal tools and system reimaging where necessary.

Need more detailed analysis?Upgrade to Pro Console

Threat ID: 682ca32db6fd31d6ed7dfa68

Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:41 PM

Last enriched: 6/19/2025, 7:50:37 PM

Last updated: 2/7/2026, 11:42:00 AM

Views: 38

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats