CVE-2000-0225: The Pocsag POC32 program does not properly prevent remote users from accessing its server port, even
The Pocsag POC32 program does not properly prevent remote users from accessing its server port, even if the option has been disabled.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2000-0225 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting version 2.05 of the Pocsag POC32 program, a software product developed by deti_fliegl. The vulnerability arises because the program does not properly restrict remote access to its server port, even when the user has disabled this option. This means that remote attackers can connect to the server port without authentication or authorization, potentially gaining access to sensitive information transmitted or processed by the POC32 server. The CVSS score of 5.0 reflects a network attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no authentication required (Au:N), with partial confidentiality impact (C:P), but no impact on integrity (I:N) or availability (A:N). Since no patch is available and no known exploits are reported in the wild, the vulnerability remains unmitigated and could be exploited by attackers who discover the exposed server port. The vulnerability is dated from 2000, indicating it affects legacy systems or environments still running this outdated software version. The lack of proper access control on the server port represents a significant security weakness, as it allows unauthorized remote users to potentially intercept or access confidential data handled by the POC32 program.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends largely on whether they use the Pocsag POC32 program version 2.05 or similar legacy systems. Organizations in sectors that rely on paging or messaging systems, such as emergency services, healthcare, or industrial control systems, may be at risk if they still operate this software. Unauthorized remote access to the server port could lead to exposure of sensitive information, potentially violating data protection regulations like GDPR. Although the vulnerability does not allow modification or denial of service, the confidentiality breach alone can have serious consequences, including loss of trust, regulatory fines, and operational risks. Given the age of the vulnerability, it is less likely to affect modern IT environments, but legacy systems in critical infrastructure or specialized industries in Europe may still be vulnerable. The absence of patches means organizations must rely on alternative mitigations to protect their networks.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no official patch is available for CVE-2000-0225, European organizations should implement compensating controls to mitigate the risk. First, network-level restrictions should be applied to block external access to the POC32 server port using firewalls or access control lists, ensuring only trusted internal hosts can connect. Network segmentation can isolate legacy systems running POC32 from the broader corporate network and the internet. Monitoring and logging network traffic to detect unauthorized connection attempts to the server port is critical. If possible, organizations should consider upgrading or replacing the POC32 software with a more secure and supported messaging solution. Additionally, disabling or uninstalling the POC32 program where it is no longer needed reduces the attack surface. Regular security assessments and audits of legacy systems should be conducted to identify and remediate similar vulnerabilities.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands
CVE-2000-0225: The Pocsag POC32 program does not properly prevent remote users from accessing its server port, even
Description
The Pocsag POC32 program does not properly prevent remote users from accessing its server port, even if the option has been disabled.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2000-0225 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting version 2.05 of the Pocsag POC32 program, a software product developed by deti_fliegl. The vulnerability arises because the program does not properly restrict remote access to its server port, even when the user has disabled this option. This means that remote attackers can connect to the server port without authentication or authorization, potentially gaining access to sensitive information transmitted or processed by the POC32 server. The CVSS score of 5.0 reflects a network attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no authentication required (Au:N), with partial confidentiality impact (C:P), but no impact on integrity (I:N) or availability (A:N). Since no patch is available and no known exploits are reported in the wild, the vulnerability remains unmitigated and could be exploited by attackers who discover the exposed server port. The vulnerability is dated from 2000, indicating it affects legacy systems or environments still running this outdated software version. The lack of proper access control on the server port represents a significant security weakness, as it allows unauthorized remote users to potentially intercept or access confidential data handled by the POC32 program.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends largely on whether they use the Pocsag POC32 program version 2.05 or similar legacy systems. Organizations in sectors that rely on paging or messaging systems, such as emergency services, healthcare, or industrial control systems, may be at risk if they still operate this software. Unauthorized remote access to the server port could lead to exposure of sensitive information, potentially violating data protection regulations like GDPR. Although the vulnerability does not allow modification or denial of service, the confidentiality breach alone can have serious consequences, including loss of trust, regulatory fines, and operational risks. Given the age of the vulnerability, it is less likely to affect modern IT environments, but legacy systems in critical infrastructure or specialized industries in Europe may still be vulnerable. The absence of patches means organizations must rely on alternative mitigations to protect their networks.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no official patch is available for CVE-2000-0225, European organizations should implement compensating controls to mitigate the risk. First, network-level restrictions should be applied to block external access to the POC32 server port using firewalls or access control lists, ensuring only trusted internal hosts can connect. Network segmentation can isolate legacy systems running POC32 from the broader corporate network and the internet. Monitoring and logging network traffic to detect unauthorized connection attempts to the server port is critical. If possible, organizations should consider upgrading or replacing the POC32 software with a more secure and supported messaging solution. Additionally, disabling or uninstalling the POC32 program where it is no longer needed reduces the attack surface. Regular security assessments and audits of legacy systems should be conducted to identify and remediate similar vulnerabilities.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Threat ID: 682ca32db6fd31d6ed7df8d3
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:41 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 12:12:01 AM
Last updated: 8/15/2025, 5:56:18 PM
Views: 12
Related Threats
CVE-2025-8878: CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') in properfraction Paid Membership Plugin, Ecommerce, User Registration Form, Login Form, User Profile & Restrict Content – ProfilePress
MediumCVE-2025-8143: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in pencidesign Soledad
MediumCVE-2025-8719: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in reubenthiessen Translate This gTranslate Shortcode
MediumCVE-2025-8464: CWE-23 Relative Path Traversal in glenwpcoder Drag and Drop Multiple File Upload for Contact Form 7
MediumCVE-2025-7499: CWE-862 Missing Authorization in wpdevteam BetterDocs – Advanced AI-Driven Documentation, FAQ & Knowledge Base Tool for Elementor & Gutenberg with Encyclopedia, AI Support, Instant Answers
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.