Skip to main content

CVE-2000-0244: The Citrix ICA (Independent Computing Architecture) protocol uses weak encryption (XOR) for user aut

High
VulnerabilityCVE-2000-0244cve-2000-0244
Published: Wed Mar 29 2000 (03/29/2000, 05:00:00 UTC)
Source: NVD
Vendor/Project: citrix
Product: metaframe

Description

The Citrix ICA (Independent Computing Architecture) protocol uses weak encryption (XOR) for user authentication.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 06/25/2025, 10:15:36 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2000-0244 identifies a critical vulnerability in the Citrix ICA (Independent Computing Architecture) protocol, specifically affecting early versions of Citrix MetaFrame (versions 1.0 and 3.5_1.8 for Windows NT). The core issue lies in the use of weak encryption—specifically an XOR-based scheme—for user authentication. XOR encryption is a simple symmetric operation that can be trivially reversed or broken with minimal computational effort, rendering the authentication process vulnerable to interception and decryption by attackers. Since the vulnerability allows an attacker to capture and decrypt authentication credentials without requiring user interaction or authentication, it exposes the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected systems. The CVSS score of 10.0 (critical) reflects the severity of this flaw, highlighting that the vulnerability can be exploited remotely over the network (AV:N), requires no authentication (Au:N), and has a low attack complexity (AC:L). Successful exploitation can lead to full compromise of user credentials, unauthorized access, and potentially complete control over the Citrix MetaFrame environment. Given the age of the affected versions and the lack of available patches, systems still running these versions remain highly vulnerable. Although no known exploits have been reported in the wild, the theoretical ease of exploitation and the critical impact make this a significant threat to any organization relying on these legacy Citrix products for remote access or application delivery.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a severe risk, especially for those in sectors heavily reliant on remote desktop and application virtualization technologies, such as finance, healthcare, government, and critical infrastructure. Exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data, disruption of business operations, and potential lateral movement within networks. The compromise of authentication credentials could facilitate further attacks, including data exfiltration, ransomware deployment, or espionage. Given the criticality of the vulnerability and the absence of patches, organizations using affected Citrix MetaFrame versions are at heightened risk of compromise. This is particularly concerning for entities with regulatory compliance requirements such as GDPR, where data breaches can result in substantial fines and reputational damage. Moreover, the vulnerability undermines trust in remote access solutions, which are increasingly vital in the European context due to widespread remote work practices.

Mitigation Recommendations

Since no official patches are available for the affected versions, European organizations should prioritize the following specific mitigation strategies: 1) Immediate identification and inventory of all Citrix MetaFrame instances running versions 1.0 or 3.5_1.8 for Windows NT. 2) Rapid upgrade or migration to supported, patched versions of Citrix products that employ strong, modern encryption standards for authentication. 3) If upgrading is not immediately feasible, implement network-level controls such as isolating vulnerable Citrix servers within segmented, monitored network zones and restricting access to trusted IP addresses only. 4) Deploy VPNs or other secure tunneling mechanisms to encapsulate ICA traffic, thereby adding an additional encryption layer to protect authentication credentials in transit. 5) Enhance monitoring and logging around Citrix access points to detect anomalous authentication attempts or unusual network activity indicative of exploitation attempts. 6) Conduct regular security awareness training for IT staff to recognize and respond to potential exploitation signs. 7) Consider deploying multi-factor authentication (MFA) solutions external to the vulnerable ICA protocol to add an additional layer of authentication security. These targeted mitigations go beyond generic advice by focusing on compensating controls and network architecture adjustments tailored to the specific weaknesses of the ICA protocol in these legacy versions.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Threat ID: 682ca32db6fd31d6ed7df947

Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:41 PM

Last enriched: 6/25/2025, 10:15:36 AM

Last updated: 8/14/2025, 3:25:26 PM

Views: 11

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats