Skip to main content

CVE-2000-0553: Race condition in IPFilter firewall 3.4.3 and earlier, when configured with overlapping "return-rst"

Low
VulnerabilityCVE-2000-0553cve-2000-0553
Published: Fri May 26 2000 (05/26/2000, 04:00:00 UTC)
Source: NVD
Vendor/Project: darren_reed
Product: ipfilter

Description

Race condition in IPFilter firewall 3.4.3 and earlier, when configured with overlapping "return-rst" and "keep state" rules, allows remote attackers to bypass access restrictions.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 06/19/2025, 18:32:45 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2000-0553 describes a race condition vulnerability in the IPFilter firewall versions 3.4.3 and earlier, specifically when configured with overlapping "return-rst" and "keep state" rules. IPFilter is a widely used open-source firewall software developed by Darren Reed, commonly deployed on Unix-like operating systems to filter network traffic. The vulnerability arises from the firewall's handling of concurrent packet processing where overlapping rules can cause inconsistent state evaluation. In particular, the race condition allows remote attackers to bypass access restrictions by exploiting timing discrepancies between the "return-rst" rule, which sends a TCP reset to terminate connections, and the "keep state" rule, which tracks connection states to enforce firewall policies. Because of this race, an attacker can craft packets that evade the intended filtering, potentially allowing unauthorized traffic through the firewall. The vulnerability does not require authentication and can be triggered remotely over the network. However, exploitation complexity is high due to the need to precisely time packets to exploit the race condition. The impact is limited to integrity, as unauthorized access restrictions can be bypassed, but confidentiality and availability are not directly affected. The CVSS v2 score is 2.6 (low severity), reflecting the limited impact and high attack complexity. No patches are available for this vulnerability, and no known exploits have been reported in the wild. Given the age of the vulnerability (published in 2000) and the specific configuration requirements, it is unlikely to be widely exploited today, but legacy systems running vulnerable IPFilter versions with the described configuration remain at risk.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability is the potential bypass of firewall access controls, which could allow unauthorized network traffic to pass through perimeter defenses. This could lead to unauthorized access to internal systems or services, undermining network segmentation and security policies. Although the vulnerability does not directly compromise confidentiality or availability, the integrity of network access controls is weakened, increasing the risk of further exploitation or lateral movement by attackers. Organizations relying on legacy Unix-like systems with IPFilter 3.4.3 or earlier, particularly those with complex firewall rules involving "return-rst" and "keep state" configurations, are most at risk. Critical infrastructure providers, government agencies, and enterprises with legacy network equipment in Europe could face increased exposure if these systems are not updated or mitigated. However, the overall risk is mitigated by the high complexity of exploitation and the availability of alternative firewall solutions in modern environments.

Mitigation Recommendations

Given that no official patches are available for this vulnerability, European organizations should consider the following specific mitigation steps: 1) Audit firewall configurations to identify overlapping "return-rst" and "keep state" rules and refactor rulesets to eliminate overlaps that trigger the race condition. 2) Where possible, upgrade or replace IPFilter with more recent firewall solutions that do not exhibit this vulnerability, such as modern versions of IPFilter without this issue or alternative firewalls like pf or iptables. 3) Implement network segmentation and defense-in-depth strategies to limit the impact of any firewall bypass, including internal access controls and intrusion detection systems. 4) Monitor network traffic for anomalous patterns that could indicate attempts to exploit timing-based race conditions. 5) For legacy systems that cannot be upgraded immediately, consider isolating them from critical network segments or restricting external access to reduce exposure. 6) Conduct regular security assessments and penetration tests focusing on firewall rule effectiveness and potential bypass techniques.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Threat ID: 682ca32db6fd31d6ed7dfb79

Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:41 PM

Last enriched: 6/19/2025, 6:32:45 PM

Last updated: 8/14/2025, 2:21:19 PM

Views: 10

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats