CVE-2020-28622: CWE-129: Improper Validation of Array Index in CGAL Project libcgal
Multiple code execution vulnerabilities exists in the Nef polygon-parsing functionality of CGAL libcgal CGAL-5.1.1. A specially crafted malformed file can lead to an out-of-bounds read and type confusion, which could lead to code execution. An attacker can provide malicious input to trigger any of these vulnerabilities. An oob read vulnerability exists in Nef_S2/SNC_io_parser.h SNC_io_parser<EW>::read_edge() eh->incident_sface().
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2020-28622 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting the CGAL Project's libcgal library, specifically version 5.1.1. The vulnerability arises from improper validation of array indices (CWE-129) within the Nef polygon-parsing functionality. The flaw is located in the SNC_io_parser<EW>::read_edge() function, particularly in the call to eh->incident_sface(), which can result in an out-of-bounds (OOB) read. This OOB read can lead to type confusion, a condition where the program misinterprets the type of data in memory. Such type confusion can be exploited by an attacker to execute arbitrary code. The attack vector involves supplying a specially crafted malformed file to the vulnerable parser, which triggers the OOB read and subsequent type confusion. Since the vulnerability is in a polygon-parsing library, it is likely used in applications that process geometric data, such as CAD software, scientific computing tools, or 3D modeling applications. There are no known exploits in the wild, and no official patches or updates have been linked in the provided data. The vulnerability does not require authentication but does require the victim to process a maliciously crafted input file, implying some level of user interaction or file ingestion by the vulnerable software. The improper validation of array indices can compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability by enabling code execution, potentially allowing attackers to take control of affected systems or cause denial of service.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact depends largely on the use of CGAL libcgal 5.1.1 within their software stack. Organizations involved in engineering, manufacturing, scientific research, and CAD-related industries are at higher risk, as these sectors commonly use geometric computation libraries like CGAL. Successful exploitation could lead to remote code execution, allowing attackers to compromise sensitive intellectual property, disrupt critical design or manufacturing processes, or pivot within internal networks. Given the specialized nature of the library, widespread impact across general business sectors is limited, but targeted attacks against high-value engineering or research institutions could be significant. Additionally, the lack of known exploits suggests a lower immediate threat, but the potential for future exploitation remains. The vulnerability could also be leveraged in supply chain attacks if malicious files are introduced into trusted workflows. The impact on availability could manifest as application crashes or system instability when processing malformed files, affecting operational continuity.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate mitigation involves auditing all software and internal tools that utilize CGAL libcgal 5.1.1, especially those handling external polygon or geometric data inputs. 2. Implement strict input validation and sanitization at the application level to detect and reject malformed or suspicious polygon files before they reach the vulnerable parser. 3. Employ sandboxing or containerization for applications processing untrusted files to limit the impact of potential exploitation. 4. Monitor file ingestion points for unusual activity or malformed file submissions. 5. Engage with CGAL project maintainers or community to obtain patches or updates addressing this vulnerability; if none are available, consider upgrading to a later version of CGAL that may have fixed this issue. 6. Incorporate runtime protections such as Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR), Data Execution Prevention (DEP), and Control Flow Integrity (CFI) to reduce exploitation success. 7. Educate users and administrators about the risks of processing untrusted polygon files and enforce strict access controls on file upload and processing systems. 8. Conduct regular security assessments and code reviews focusing on third-party library usage and input handling.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, Belgium
CVE-2020-28622: CWE-129: Improper Validation of Array Index in CGAL Project libcgal
Description
Multiple code execution vulnerabilities exists in the Nef polygon-parsing functionality of CGAL libcgal CGAL-5.1.1. A specially crafted malformed file can lead to an out-of-bounds read and type confusion, which could lead to code execution. An attacker can provide malicious input to trigger any of these vulnerabilities. An oob read vulnerability exists in Nef_S2/SNC_io_parser.h SNC_io_parser<EW>::read_edge() eh->incident_sface().
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2020-28622 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting the CGAL Project's libcgal library, specifically version 5.1.1. The vulnerability arises from improper validation of array indices (CWE-129) within the Nef polygon-parsing functionality. The flaw is located in the SNC_io_parser<EW>::read_edge() function, particularly in the call to eh->incident_sface(), which can result in an out-of-bounds (OOB) read. This OOB read can lead to type confusion, a condition where the program misinterprets the type of data in memory. Such type confusion can be exploited by an attacker to execute arbitrary code. The attack vector involves supplying a specially crafted malformed file to the vulnerable parser, which triggers the OOB read and subsequent type confusion. Since the vulnerability is in a polygon-parsing library, it is likely used in applications that process geometric data, such as CAD software, scientific computing tools, or 3D modeling applications. There are no known exploits in the wild, and no official patches or updates have been linked in the provided data. The vulnerability does not require authentication but does require the victim to process a maliciously crafted input file, implying some level of user interaction or file ingestion by the vulnerable software. The improper validation of array indices can compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability by enabling code execution, potentially allowing attackers to take control of affected systems or cause denial of service.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact depends largely on the use of CGAL libcgal 5.1.1 within their software stack. Organizations involved in engineering, manufacturing, scientific research, and CAD-related industries are at higher risk, as these sectors commonly use geometric computation libraries like CGAL. Successful exploitation could lead to remote code execution, allowing attackers to compromise sensitive intellectual property, disrupt critical design or manufacturing processes, or pivot within internal networks. Given the specialized nature of the library, widespread impact across general business sectors is limited, but targeted attacks against high-value engineering or research institutions could be significant. Additionally, the lack of known exploits suggests a lower immediate threat, but the potential for future exploitation remains. The vulnerability could also be leveraged in supply chain attacks if malicious files are introduced into trusted workflows. The impact on availability could manifest as application crashes or system instability when processing malformed files, affecting operational continuity.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate mitigation involves auditing all software and internal tools that utilize CGAL libcgal 5.1.1, especially those handling external polygon or geometric data inputs. 2. Implement strict input validation and sanitization at the application level to detect and reject malformed or suspicious polygon files before they reach the vulnerable parser. 3. Employ sandboxing or containerization for applications processing untrusted files to limit the impact of potential exploitation. 4. Monitor file ingestion points for unusual activity or malformed file submissions. 5. Engage with CGAL project maintainers or community to obtain patches or updates addressing this vulnerability; if none are available, consider upgrading to a later version of CGAL that may have fixed this issue. 6. Incorporate runtime protections such as Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR), Data Execution Prevention (DEP), and Control Flow Integrity (CFI) to reduce exploitation success. 7. Educate users and administrators about the risks of processing untrusted polygon files and enforce strict access controls on file upload and processing systems. 8. Conduct regular security assessments and code reviews focusing on third-party library usage and input handling.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- talos
- Date Reserved
- 2020-11-13T00:00:00.000Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
Threat ID: 682d9842c4522896dcbf2a59
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:22 AM
Last enriched: 6/23/2025, 12:49:46 PM
Last updated: 8/15/2025, 12:10:15 PM
Views: 10
Related Threats
CVE-2025-8959: CWE-59: Improper Link Resolution Before File Access (Link Following) in HashiCorp Shared library
HighCVE-2025-44201
LowCVE-2025-36088: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') in IBM Storage TS4500 Library
MediumCVE-2025-43490: CWE-59 Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following') in HP, Inc. HP Hotkey Support Software
MediumCVE-2025-9060: CWE-20 Improper Input Validation in MSoft MFlash
CriticalActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.