Skip to main content

CVE-2022-24845: CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound in vyperlang vyper

Medium
Published: Wed Apr 13 2022 (04/13/2022, 21:15:16 UTC)
Source: CVE
Vendor/Project: vyperlang
Product: vyper

Description

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. In affected versions, the return of `<iface>.returns_int128()` is not validated to fall within the bounds of `int128`. This issue can result in a misinterpretation of the integer value and lead to incorrect behavior. As of v0.3.0, `<iface>.returns_int128()` is validated in simple expressions, but not complex expressions. Users are advised to upgrade. There is no known workaround for this issue.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 06/22/2025, 02:22:30 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2022-24845 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting the Vyper programming language, which is a Pythonic smart contract language designed for the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). The vulnerability arises from an integer overflow or wraparound issue (CWE-190) in the handling of 128-bit signed integers (int128) returned by interface functions. Specifically, the return value of `<iface>.returns_int128()` is not properly validated to ensure it falls within the valid bounds of an int128 type. This lack of validation can cause the integer value to be misinterpreted, potentially leading to incorrect contract behavior. Although from version 0.3.0 some validation is performed in simple expressions, complex expressions still lack this safeguard. The affected versions are all versions prior to 0.3.2. There is no known workaround other than upgrading to a fixed version. No known exploits have been reported in the wild to date. The vulnerability could cause smart contracts written in Vyper to behave unpredictably or incorrectly, which in turn could lead to financial loss, logic errors, or security breaches in decentralized applications (dApps) running on Ethereum or compatible blockchains. Since Vyper is used primarily for smart contract development, the impact is mostly on the integrity and correctness of contract execution rather than direct system compromise. The vulnerability does not require authentication or user interaction to be triggered, but exploitation requires deployment or interaction with vulnerable smart contracts. The issue is technical and specific to the language's integer handling in contract code, making it a concern primarily for developers and organizations deploying smart contracts using Vyper versions before 0.3.2.

Potential Impact

For European organizations involved in blockchain development, decentralized finance (DeFi), or any Ethereum-based applications, this vulnerability poses a risk to the integrity and reliability of smart contracts. Exploitation could lead to incorrect contract logic execution, potentially causing financial losses, unauthorized asset transfers, or disruption of services relying on these contracts. Given the growing adoption of blockchain technologies in Europe, especially in fintech hubs like Germany, the Netherlands, and Switzerland, the vulnerability could undermine trust in smart contract platforms if exploited. Additionally, organizations using vulnerable Vyper versions may face compliance and regulatory scrutiny if contract failures lead to breaches of financial or data protection regulations. The absence of known exploits reduces immediate risk, but the potential for future exploitation remains, especially as attackers analyze vulnerable contracts. The impact is primarily on the confidentiality and integrity of smart contract data and operations, with availability less directly affected unless contract failures cascade into service disruptions.

Mitigation Recommendations

The primary mitigation is to upgrade all Vyper compiler versions to 0.3.2 or later, where the integer validation issue has been addressed. Organizations should audit their smart contract codebases to identify contracts compiled with vulnerable Vyper versions and consider redeploying or patching them if feasible. Implement rigorous testing and static analysis focused on integer boundary conditions in smart contracts, especially those involving int128 returns from interfaces. Employ formal verification tools where possible to detect integer overflow risks. Avoid complex expressions involving `<iface>.returns_int128()` in contracts until upgraded. Monitor blockchain activity for anomalous contract behavior that could indicate exploitation attempts. Educate developers on secure smart contract coding practices and the importance of using updated compiler versions. Since no workaround exists, proactive upgrade and code review are critical. Additionally, organizations should maintain a robust incident response plan tailored to blockchain environments to quickly address any exploitation scenarios.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
GitHub_M
Date Reserved
2022-02-10T00:00:00.000Z
Cisa Enriched
true

Threat ID: 682d9848c4522896dcbf63a6

Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:28 AM

Last enriched: 6/22/2025, 2:22:30 AM

Last updated: 8/3/2025, 12:44:42 PM

Views: 13

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats