CVE-2022-29254: CWE-436: Interpretation Conflict in silverstripe silverstripe-omnipay
silverstripe-omnipay is a SilverStripe integration with Omnipay PHP payments library. For a subset of Omnipay gateways (those that use intermediary states like `isNotification()` or `isRedirect()`), if the payment identifier or success URL is exposed it is possible for payments to be prematurely marked as completed without payment being taken. This is mitigated by the fact that most payment gateways hide this information from users, however some issuing banks offer flawed 3DSecure implementations that may inadvertently expose this data. The following versions have been patched to fix this issue: `2.5.2`, `3.0.2`, `3.1.4`, and `3.2.1`. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2022-29254 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting the silverstripe-omnipay integration, which combines the SilverStripe CMS framework with the Omnipay PHP payments library. The vulnerability arises due to an interpretation conflict (CWE-436) in handling payment states for certain Omnipay gateways that utilize intermediary states such as isNotification() or isRedirect(). Specifically, if an attacker can obtain the payment identifier or the success URL—parameters that are typically protected—they can manipulate the payment flow to prematurely mark a transaction as completed without the actual payment being processed. This flaw stems from some issuing banks implementing flawed 3DSecure protocols that inadvertently expose sensitive payment state information. The vulnerability affects multiple versions of silverstripe-omnipay prior to patched releases 2.5.2, 3.0.2, 3.1.4, and 3.2.1. No known workarounds exist, and while most payment gateways do not expose these identifiers to users, the reliance on third-party 3DSecure implementations introduces risk. Exploitation does not require authentication but does require access to the payment identifier or success URL, which may be obtained through interception or social engineering. There are no known exploits in the wild as of the published date, but the vulnerability could enable attackers to fraudulently mark payments as successful, leading to financial loss and undermining transaction integrity.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, especially e-commerce platforms and service providers using SilverStripe with the omnipay integration, this vulnerability poses a risk of financial fraud and transactional integrity compromise. Attackers exploiting this flaw could bypass payment verification, resulting in goods or services being delivered without actual payment. This undermines revenue streams and could damage customer trust. Additionally, fraudulent transactions may complicate reconciliation and auditing processes, increasing operational costs. The impact extends to compliance risks, as payment fraud can violate regulations such as PSD2 and GDPR if personal or payment data is mishandled. The reliance on third-party banks' 3DSecure implementations means organizations have limited control over exposure, increasing risk in regions where banks have weaker 3DSecure deployments. The vulnerability could also be leveraged in targeted attacks against high-value transactions or critical services, amplifying financial and reputational damage.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should immediately upgrade silverstripe-omnipay to the patched versions 2.5.2, 3.0.2, 3.1.4, or 3.2.1 depending on their current version. Beyond patching, organizations should audit their payment gateway configurations to ensure that payment identifiers and success URLs are never exposed to end users or transmitted insecurely. Implement strict access controls and logging around payment state endpoints to detect anomalous access patterns. Collaborate with issuing banks to verify the robustness of their 3DSecure implementations and advocate for secure handling of payment state information. Employ network-level protections such as TLS to prevent interception of sensitive URLs. Additionally, implement server-side validation of payment completion status directly with payment gateways rather than relying solely on client-side indicators. Regularly review transaction logs for discrepancies indicative of premature payment marking. Finally, consider integrating fraud detection mechanisms that flag unusual payment state transitions or rapid success confirmations.
Affected Countries
United Kingdom, Germany, France, Netherlands, Sweden, Belgium, Ireland
CVE-2022-29254: CWE-436: Interpretation Conflict in silverstripe silverstripe-omnipay
Description
silverstripe-omnipay is a SilverStripe integration with Omnipay PHP payments library. For a subset of Omnipay gateways (those that use intermediary states like `isNotification()` or `isRedirect()`), if the payment identifier or success URL is exposed it is possible for payments to be prematurely marked as completed without payment being taken. This is mitigated by the fact that most payment gateways hide this information from users, however some issuing banks offer flawed 3DSecure implementations that may inadvertently expose this data. The following versions have been patched to fix this issue: `2.5.2`, `3.0.2`, `3.1.4`, and `3.2.1`. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2022-29254 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting the silverstripe-omnipay integration, which combines the SilverStripe CMS framework with the Omnipay PHP payments library. The vulnerability arises due to an interpretation conflict (CWE-436) in handling payment states for certain Omnipay gateways that utilize intermediary states such as isNotification() or isRedirect(). Specifically, if an attacker can obtain the payment identifier or the success URL—parameters that are typically protected—they can manipulate the payment flow to prematurely mark a transaction as completed without the actual payment being processed. This flaw stems from some issuing banks implementing flawed 3DSecure protocols that inadvertently expose sensitive payment state information. The vulnerability affects multiple versions of silverstripe-omnipay prior to patched releases 2.5.2, 3.0.2, 3.1.4, and 3.2.1. No known workarounds exist, and while most payment gateways do not expose these identifiers to users, the reliance on third-party 3DSecure implementations introduces risk. Exploitation does not require authentication but does require access to the payment identifier or success URL, which may be obtained through interception or social engineering. There are no known exploits in the wild as of the published date, but the vulnerability could enable attackers to fraudulently mark payments as successful, leading to financial loss and undermining transaction integrity.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, especially e-commerce platforms and service providers using SilverStripe with the omnipay integration, this vulnerability poses a risk of financial fraud and transactional integrity compromise. Attackers exploiting this flaw could bypass payment verification, resulting in goods or services being delivered without actual payment. This undermines revenue streams and could damage customer trust. Additionally, fraudulent transactions may complicate reconciliation and auditing processes, increasing operational costs. The impact extends to compliance risks, as payment fraud can violate regulations such as PSD2 and GDPR if personal or payment data is mishandled. The reliance on third-party banks' 3DSecure implementations means organizations have limited control over exposure, increasing risk in regions where banks have weaker 3DSecure deployments. The vulnerability could also be leveraged in targeted attacks against high-value transactions or critical services, amplifying financial and reputational damage.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should immediately upgrade silverstripe-omnipay to the patched versions 2.5.2, 3.0.2, 3.1.4, or 3.2.1 depending on their current version. Beyond patching, organizations should audit their payment gateway configurations to ensure that payment identifiers and success URLs are never exposed to end users or transmitted insecurely. Implement strict access controls and logging around payment state endpoints to detect anomalous access patterns. Collaborate with issuing banks to verify the robustness of their 3DSecure implementations and advocate for secure handling of payment state information. Employ network-level protections such as TLS to prevent interception of sensitive URLs. Additionally, implement server-side validation of payment completion status directly with payment gateways rather than relying solely on client-side indicators. Regularly review transaction logs for discrepancies indicative of premature payment marking. Finally, consider integrating fraud detection mechanisms that flag unusual payment state transitions or rapid success confirmations.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- GitHub_M
- Date Reserved
- 2022-04-13T00:00:00.000Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
Threat ID: 682d9843c4522896dcbf3305
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:23 AM
Last enriched: 6/23/2025, 6:19:46 AM
Last updated: 8/2/2025, 1:00:56 PM
Views: 12
Related Threats
CVE-2025-8964: Improper Authentication in code-projects Hostel Management System
MediumCVE-2025-7971: CWE-20: Improper Input Validation in Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer®
HighCVE-2025-40758: CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in Siemens Mendix SAML (Mendix 10.12 compatible)
HighCVE-2025-36613: CWE-266: Incorrect Privilege Assignment in Dell SupportAssist for Home PCs
LowCVE-2025-27845: n/a
UnknownActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.