CVE-2022-35025: n/a in n/a
OTFCC commit 617837b was discovered to contain a segmentation violation via /release-x64/otfccdump+0x5266a8.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2022-35025 is a vulnerability identified in the OTFCC project, specifically linked to a commit (617837b) that introduces a segmentation violation in the binary component /release-x64/otfccdump at offset 0x5266a8. OTFCC (OpenType Font Compact Compiler) is a tool used for compiling and manipulating OpenType font files. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-787, which corresponds to out-of-bounds write errors, commonly leading to memory corruption issues such as segmentation faults. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 6.5, indicating a medium severity level. The vector string (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) reveals that the attack vector is network-based (AV:N), requires low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges (PR:N), but requires user interaction (UI:R). The scope remains unchanged (S:U), and the impact is solely on availability (A:H), with no confidentiality or integrity impact. This means an attacker can cause a denial of service by triggering the segmentation violation remotely, but cannot directly compromise data confidentiality or integrity. No specific vendor or product version details are provided, which suggests the vulnerability affects the OTFCC tool in general or its builds around the specified commit. No patches or known exploits in the wild have been reported at the time of publication. The segmentation violation likely results from improper bounds checking or memory handling in the otfccdump utility, which processes font files. Exploiting this vulnerability would require a user to interact with a crafted font file, potentially delivered over a network or embedded in documents, leading to a crash or denial of service of the otfccdump process.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2022-35025 is a potential denial of service in environments where OTFCC tools are used for font processing, font compilation, or font analysis. This could affect software development teams, digital publishing houses, graphic design firms, and any enterprise relying on automated font handling pipelines. While the vulnerability does not compromise confidentiality or integrity, disruption of font processing workflows could delay production, impact document rendering, or interrupt automated build systems. In sectors such as media, publishing, and software development, this could translate into operational downtime and productivity losses. Since exploitation requires user interaction with a crafted font file, the risk is mitigated somewhat by controlled environments; however, if font files are received from external sources or integrated into automated pipelines without validation, the risk increases. European organizations with extensive digital content creation or software localization operations may be more exposed. Additionally, denial of service in font processing tools could be leveraged as part of a broader attack chain to disrupt services or delay responses.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2022-35025 effectively, European organizations should: 1) Identify and inventory all instances of OTFCC tools and related font processing utilities in their environments, including CI/CD pipelines and content management systems. 2) Apply any available patches or updates from the OTFCC project or maintainers as soon as they become available. In the absence of official patches, consider reverting to a previous stable commit prior to 617837b or applying custom code reviews and fixes to prevent out-of-bounds memory access. 3) Implement strict input validation and sanitization for all font files processed by automated systems, including scanning for malformed or suspicious font data before processing. 4) Restrict user interaction with font files from untrusted sources, and enforce policies to limit the opening or processing of font files only from verified origins. 5) Employ runtime protections such as sandboxing or containerization for font processing tools to contain potential crashes and prevent broader system impact. 6) Monitor logs and system behavior for signs of crashes or abnormal terminations of otfccdump or related processes, enabling rapid detection and response to exploitation attempts. 7) Educate developers and content handlers about the risks of processing untrusted font files and the importance of following secure handling procedures.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Poland, Sweden
CVE-2022-35025: n/a in n/a
Description
OTFCC commit 617837b was discovered to contain a segmentation violation via /release-x64/otfccdump+0x5266a8.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2022-35025 is a vulnerability identified in the OTFCC project, specifically linked to a commit (617837b) that introduces a segmentation violation in the binary component /release-x64/otfccdump at offset 0x5266a8. OTFCC (OpenType Font Compact Compiler) is a tool used for compiling and manipulating OpenType font files. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-787, which corresponds to out-of-bounds write errors, commonly leading to memory corruption issues such as segmentation faults. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 6.5, indicating a medium severity level. The vector string (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) reveals that the attack vector is network-based (AV:N), requires low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges (PR:N), but requires user interaction (UI:R). The scope remains unchanged (S:U), and the impact is solely on availability (A:H), with no confidentiality or integrity impact. This means an attacker can cause a denial of service by triggering the segmentation violation remotely, but cannot directly compromise data confidentiality or integrity. No specific vendor or product version details are provided, which suggests the vulnerability affects the OTFCC tool in general or its builds around the specified commit. No patches or known exploits in the wild have been reported at the time of publication. The segmentation violation likely results from improper bounds checking or memory handling in the otfccdump utility, which processes font files. Exploiting this vulnerability would require a user to interact with a crafted font file, potentially delivered over a network or embedded in documents, leading to a crash or denial of service of the otfccdump process.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2022-35025 is a potential denial of service in environments where OTFCC tools are used for font processing, font compilation, or font analysis. This could affect software development teams, digital publishing houses, graphic design firms, and any enterprise relying on automated font handling pipelines. While the vulnerability does not compromise confidentiality or integrity, disruption of font processing workflows could delay production, impact document rendering, or interrupt automated build systems. In sectors such as media, publishing, and software development, this could translate into operational downtime and productivity losses. Since exploitation requires user interaction with a crafted font file, the risk is mitigated somewhat by controlled environments; however, if font files are received from external sources or integrated into automated pipelines without validation, the risk increases. European organizations with extensive digital content creation or software localization operations may be more exposed. Additionally, denial of service in font processing tools could be leveraged as part of a broader attack chain to disrupt services or delay responses.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2022-35025 effectively, European organizations should: 1) Identify and inventory all instances of OTFCC tools and related font processing utilities in their environments, including CI/CD pipelines and content management systems. 2) Apply any available patches or updates from the OTFCC project or maintainers as soon as they become available. In the absence of official patches, consider reverting to a previous stable commit prior to 617837b or applying custom code reviews and fixes to prevent out-of-bounds memory access. 3) Implement strict input validation and sanitization for all font files processed by automated systems, including scanning for malformed or suspicious font data before processing. 4) Restrict user interaction with font files from untrusted sources, and enforce policies to limit the opening or processing of font files only from verified origins. 5) Employ runtime protections such as sandboxing or containerization for font processing tools to contain potential crashes and prevent broader system impact. 6) Monitor logs and system behavior for signs of crashes or abnormal terminations of otfccdump or related processes, enabling rapid detection and response to exploitation attempts. 7) Educate developers and content handlers about the risks of processing untrusted font files and the importance of following secure handling procedures.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- mitre
- Date Reserved
- 2022-07-04T00:00:00.000Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 6835da20182aa0cae217e58d
Added to database: 5/27/2025, 3:28:32 PM
Last enriched: 7/6/2025, 3:54:48 AM
Last updated: 8/1/2025, 12:43:13 PM
Views: 11
Related Threats
CVE-2025-35970: Use of weak credentials in SEIKO EPSON Multiple EPSON product
HighCVE-2025-29866: CWE-73: External Control of File Name or Path in TAGFREE X-Free Uploader
HighCVE-2025-32094: CWE-444 Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') in Akamai AkamaiGhost
MediumCVE-2025-8583: Inappropriate implementation in Google Chrome
MediumCVE-2025-8582: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Google Chrome
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.