CVE-2022-39294: CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in conduit-rust conduit-hyper
conduit-hyper integrates a conduit application with the hyper server. Prior to version 0.4.2, `conduit-hyper` did not check any limit on a request's length before calling [`hyper::body::to_bytes`](https://docs.rs/hyper/latest/hyper/body/fn.to_bytes.html). An attacker could send a malicious request with an abnormally large `Content-Length`, which could lead to a panic if memory allocation failed for that request. In version 0.4.2, `conduit-hyper` sets an internal limit of 128 MiB per request, otherwise returning status 400 ("Bad Request"). This crate is part of the implementation of Rust's [crates.io](https://crates.io/), but that service is not affected due to its existing cloud infrastructure, which already drops such malicious requests. Even with the new limit in place, `conduit-hyper` is not recommended for production use, nor to directly serve the public Internet.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2022-39294 is a vulnerability classified under CWE-400 (Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) affecting the Rust crate 'conduit-hyper', which integrates the conduit application framework with the hyper HTTP server. Versions of conduit-hyper from 0.2.0-alpha.3 up to but not including 0.4.2 do not impose any limits on the size of incoming HTTP request bodies before invoking the hyper::body::to_bytes function. This lack of validation allows an attacker to send a malicious HTTP request with an abnormally large Content-Length header, causing the server to attempt to allocate a large amount of memory to process the request body. If the allocation fails, this can lead to a panic (runtime crash) of the application, resulting in denial of service (DoS). In version 0.4.2, the developers introduced an internal limit of 128 MiB per request body, rejecting requests exceeding this size with a 400 Bad Request response. Despite this mitigation, conduit-hyper is still not recommended for production environments or direct exposure to the public Internet due to the risk of resource exhaustion attacks. The vulnerability does not affect the crates.io service itself, as it employs cloud infrastructure that already filters out such malicious requests. There are no known exploits in the wild for this vulnerability, and no official patches beyond the version 0.4.2 update are indicated. The core issue is the absence of request size validation leading to uncontrolled memory consumption and potential service disruption.
Potential Impact
For European organizations using conduit-hyper versions prior to 0.4.2, this vulnerability poses a risk of denial of service through resource exhaustion. An attacker could craft oversized HTTP requests that cause the server to allocate excessive memory, potentially crashing the application or degrading service availability. This can disrupt business operations, especially for organizations relying on conduit-hyper for internal or external web services. Although the vulnerability does not directly compromise confidentiality or integrity, the availability impact can be significant, particularly for critical infrastructure or services with high availability requirements. Since conduit-hyper is not widely recommended for production use, the exposure might be limited, but organizations using it in development, testing, or niche production environments could be affected. The lack of authentication or user interaction requirements for exploitation increases the risk, as any unauthenticated attacker with network access could attempt to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is primarily localized to the affected application instances and does not propagate beyond the compromised service.
Mitigation Recommendations
Upgrade conduit-hyper to version 0.4.2 or later, which enforces a 128 MiB request size limit and rejects oversized requests. Implement additional network-level protections such as rate limiting and request size filtering on reverse proxies or web application firewalls (WAFs) to block abnormally large HTTP requests before they reach conduit-hyper. Avoid deploying conduit-hyper directly exposed to the public Internet; instead, place it behind hardened gateways or load balancers that can enforce stricter request validation. Monitor application logs and system metrics for signs of abnormal memory usage or frequent panics that could indicate exploitation attempts. Conduct regular code audits and dependency reviews to identify and remediate similar uncontrolled resource consumption issues in other components. Consider alternative, more mature HTTP server frameworks for production environments that provide robust request size validation and resource management.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Denmark
CVE-2022-39294: CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in conduit-rust conduit-hyper
Description
conduit-hyper integrates a conduit application with the hyper server. Prior to version 0.4.2, `conduit-hyper` did not check any limit on a request's length before calling [`hyper::body::to_bytes`](https://docs.rs/hyper/latest/hyper/body/fn.to_bytes.html). An attacker could send a malicious request with an abnormally large `Content-Length`, which could lead to a panic if memory allocation failed for that request. In version 0.4.2, `conduit-hyper` sets an internal limit of 128 MiB per request, otherwise returning status 400 ("Bad Request"). This crate is part of the implementation of Rust's [crates.io](https://crates.io/), but that service is not affected due to its existing cloud infrastructure, which already drops such malicious requests. Even with the new limit in place, `conduit-hyper` is not recommended for production use, nor to directly serve the public Internet.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2022-39294 is a vulnerability classified under CWE-400 (Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) affecting the Rust crate 'conduit-hyper', which integrates the conduit application framework with the hyper HTTP server. Versions of conduit-hyper from 0.2.0-alpha.3 up to but not including 0.4.2 do not impose any limits on the size of incoming HTTP request bodies before invoking the hyper::body::to_bytes function. This lack of validation allows an attacker to send a malicious HTTP request with an abnormally large Content-Length header, causing the server to attempt to allocate a large amount of memory to process the request body. If the allocation fails, this can lead to a panic (runtime crash) of the application, resulting in denial of service (DoS). In version 0.4.2, the developers introduced an internal limit of 128 MiB per request body, rejecting requests exceeding this size with a 400 Bad Request response. Despite this mitigation, conduit-hyper is still not recommended for production environments or direct exposure to the public Internet due to the risk of resource exhaustion attacks. The vulnerability does not affect the crates.io service itself, as it employs cloud infrastructure that already filters out such malicious requests. There are no known exploits in the wild for this vulnerability, and no official patches beyond the version 0.4.2 update are indicated. The core issue is the absence of request size validation leading to uncontrolled memory consumption and potential service disruption.
Potential Impact
For European organizations using conduit-hyper versions prior to 0.4.2, this vulnerability poses a risk of denial of service through resource exhaustion. An attacker could craft oversized HTTP requests that cause the server to allocate excessive memory, potentially crashing the application or degrading service availability. This can disrupt business operations, especially for organizations relying on conduit-hyper for internal or external web services. Although the vulnerability does not directly compromise confidentiality or integrity, the availability impact can be significant, particularly for critical infrastructure or services with high availability requirements. Since conduit-hyper is not widely recommended for production use, the exposure might be limited, but organizations using it in development, testing, or niche production environments could be affected. The lack of authentication or user interaction requirements for exploitation increases the risk, as any unauthenticated attacker with network access could attempt to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is primarily localized to the affected application instances and does not propagate beyond the compromised service.
Mitigation Recommendations
Upgrade conduit-hyper to version 0.4.2 or later, which enforces a 128 MiB request size limit and rejects oversized requests. Implement additional network-level protections such as rate limiting and request size filtering on reverse proxies or web application firewalls (WAFs) to block abnormally large HTTP requests before they reach conduit-hyper. Avoid deploying conduit-hyper directly exposed to the public Internet; instead, place it behind hardened gateways or load balancers that can enforce stricter request validation. Monitor application logs and system metrics for signs of abnormal memory usage or frequent panics that could indicate exploitation attempts. Conduct regular code audits and dependency reviews to identify and remediate similar uncontrolled resource consumption issues in other components. Consider alternative, more mature HTTP server frameworks for production environments that provide robust request size validation and resource management.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- GitHub_M
- Date Reserved
- 2022-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
Threat ID: 682d9845c4522896dcbf4842
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:25 AM
Last enriched: 6/22/2025, 3:19:52 PM
Last updated: 7/21/2025, 2:58:16 PM
Views: 13
Related Threats
CVE-2025-8070: CWE-428 Unquoted Search Path or Element in ASUSTOR ABP and AES
CriticalCVE-2025-31701: Vulnerability in Dahua IPC
HighCVE-2025-31700: Vulnerability in Dahua IPC
HighCVE-2025-6174: CWE-79 Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Qwizcards | online quizzes and flashcards
HighCVE-2025-54453: CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in Samsung Electronics MagicINFO 9 Server
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.