CVE-2022-43412: Vulnerability in Jenkins project Jenkins Generic Webhook Trigger Plugin
Jenkins Generic Webhook Trigger Plugin 1.84.1 and earlier uses a non-constant time comparison function when checking whether the provided and expected webhook token are equal, potentially allowing attackers to use statistical methods to obtain a valid webhook token.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2022-43412 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting the Jenkins Generic Webhook Trigger Plugin version 1.84.1 and earlier. The vulnerability arises because the plugin uses a non-constant time comparison function when validating the webhook token provided by an incoming request against the expected token. This comparison method is susceptible to timing attacks, where an attacker can measure the time taken to compare tokens and use statistical analysis to gradually infer the valid webhook token. Once the attacker obtains a valid token, they can trigger webhook events on the Jenkins server without authorization. This could allow unauthorized triggering of build jobs or other automated workflows configured to respond to webhook events. The vulnerability does not directly impact confidentiality, integrity, or availability of Jenkins itself but compromises the authentication mechanism for webhook triggers, potentially enabling unauthorized actions within the CI/CD pipeline. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 5.3 (medium), reflecting that the attack vector is network-based, requires no privileges or user interaction, and impacts confidentiality only (exposure of the webhook token). There are no known exploits in the wild as of the publication date, and no official patches were linked in the provided information, though it is likely that newer plugin versions have addressed this issue. The CWE classification is CWE-203 (Observable Timing Discrepancy), highlighting the root cause as a timing side-channel vulnerability in token comparison logic.
Potential Impact
For European organizations using Jenkins with the Generic Webhook Trigger Plugin, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized triggering of automated jobs or workflows. This could lead to unintended code deployments, execution of malicious scripts, or disruption of CI/CD pipelines. While the vulnerability does not directly allow code execution or data exfiltration, the ability to trigger jobs without authorization can be leveraged as a foothold for further attacks or to cause operational disruptions. Organizations with critical or sensitive build pipelines, especially those deploying to production environments, may face increased risk of supply chain compromise or service outages. The impact is heightened for organizations relying heavily on automated webhook triggers for continuous integration and deployment, common in European tech sectors and industries with strict regulatory requirements. Additionally, unauthorized job triggers could lead to compliance violations if they result in unapproved code changes or data handling. The medium severity indicates that while the vulnerability is not catastrophic, it should be addressed promptly to maintain the integrity of automated workflows.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should take the following specific mitigation steps: 1) Immediately upgrade the Jenkins Generic Webhook Trigger Plugin to the latest version where this timing attack vulnerability is fixed. If no official patch is available, consider applying custom patches or workarounds to enforce constant-time token comparisons. 2) Rotate all webhook tokens used in Jenkins configurations to invalidate any tokens potentially exposed through timing attacks. 3) Restrict network access to Jenkins webhook endpoints using firewall rules or network segmentation to limit exposure to trusted sources only. 4) Implement additional authentication or IP whitelisting on webhook endpoints to reduce the risk of unauthorized triggering. 5) Monitor Jenkins logs for unusual webhook trigger activity or repeated failed token validation attempts that may indicate an ongoing timing attack. 6) Educate DevOps teams about the risks of timing attacks and encourage secure token management practices. 7) Consider using alternative authentication mechanisms for webhook triggers that do not rely solely on token comparison, such as mutual TLS or signed payloads. These targeted measures go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific nature of the timing attack and the operational context of Jenkins webhook triggers.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Ireland
CVE-2022-43412: Vulnerability in Jenkins project Jenkins Generic Webhook Trigger Plugin
Description
Jenkins Generic Webhook Trigger Plugin 1.84.1 and earlier uses a non-constant time comparison function when checking whether the provided and expected webhook token are equal, potentially allowing attackers to use statistical methods to obtain a valid webhook token.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2022-43412 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting the Jenkins Generic Webhook Trigger Plugin version 1.84.1 and earlier. The vulnerability arises because the plugin uses a non-constant time comparison function when validating the webhook token provided by an incoming request against the expected token. This comparison method is susceptible to timing attacks, where an attacker can measure the time taken to compare tokens and use statistical analysis to gradually infer the valid webhook token. Once the attacker obtains a valid token, they can trigger webhook events on the Jenkins server without authorization. This could allow unauthorized triggering of build jobs or other automated workflows configured to respond to webhook events. The vulnerability does not directly impact confidentiality, integrity, or availability of Jenkins itself but compromises the authentication mechanism for webhook triggers, potentially enabling unauthorized actions within the CI/CD pipeline. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 5.3 (medium), reflecting that the attack vector is network-based, requires no privileges or user interaction, and impacts confidentiality only (exposure of the webhook token). There are no known exploits in the wild as of the publication date, and no official patches were linked in the provided information, though it is likely that newer plugin versions have addressed this issue. The CWE classification is CWE-203 (Observable Timing Discrepancy), highlighting the root cause as a timing side-channel vulnerability in token comparison logic.
Potential Impact
For European organizations using Jenkins with the Generic Webhook Trigger Plugin, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized triggering of automated jobs or workflows. This could lead to unintended code deployments, execution of malicious scripts, or disruption of CI/CD pipelines. While the vulnerability does not directly allow code execution or data exfiltration, the ability to trigger jobs without authorization can be leveraged as a foothold for further attacks or to cause operational disruptions. Organizations with critical or sensitive build pipelines, especially those deploying to production environments, may face increased risk of supply chain compromise or service outages. The impact is heightened for organizations relying heavily on automated webhook triggers for continuous integration and deployment, common in European tech sectors and industries with strict regulatory requirements. Additionally, unauthorized job triggers could lead to compliance violations if they result in unapproved code changes or data handling. The medium severity indicates that while the vulnerability is not catastrophic, it should be addressed promptly to maintain the integrity of automated workflows.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should take the following specific mitigation steps: 1) Immediately upgrade the Jenkins Generic Webhook Trigger Plugin to the latest version where this timing attack vulnerability is fixed. If no official patch is available, consider applying custom patches or workarounds to enforce constant-time token comparisons. 2) Rotate all webhook tokens used in Jenkins configurations to invalidate any tokens potentially exposed through timing attacks. 3) Restrict network access to Jenkins webhook endpoints using firewall rules or network segmentation to limit exposure to trusted sources only. 4) Implement additional authentication or IP whitelisting on webhook endpoints to reduce the risk of unauthorized triggering. 5) Monitor Jenkins logs for unusual webhook trigger activity or repeated failed token validation attempts that may indicate an ongoing timing attack. 6) Educate DevOps teams about the risks of timing attacks and encourage secure token management practices. 7) Consider using alternative authentication mechanisms for webhook triggers that do not rely solely on token comparison, such as mutual TLS or signed payloads. These targeted measures go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific nature of the timing attack and the operational context of Jenkins webhook triggers.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- jenkins
- Date Reserved
- 2022-10-18T00:00:00.000Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682d9818c4522896dcbd8011
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:08:40 AM
Last enriched: 7/5/2025, 4:11:21 AM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 8:23:36 AM
Views: 39
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-2078: Improper Authorization in yeqifu warehouse
MediumCVE-2026-25533: CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') in agentfront enclave
MediumCVE-2026-25123: CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in homarr-labs homarr
MediumCVE-2025-68621: CWE-208: Observable Timing Discrepancy in TriliumNext Trilium
HighCVE-2026-2074: XML External Entity Reference in O2OA
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.