CVE-2025-32461VulnerabilityPublished 8 Jul 2025

[CVE-2025-32461] Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware <= 28.3 Two SSTI Vulnerabilities

Source Reddit NetSec

Not known to be exploited.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

Severity

Medium

Rated by Threat Radar · No CVSS score from NVD or the CNA

EPSS: 0.9% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 60% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
Public on cve.org; its publication date is not in this record
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

European organizations should immediately audit their Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware installations to identify affected versions (<= 28.3). Until official patches are released, organizations should implement the following mitigations: 1) Restrict access to Tiki Wiki administration and template editing interfaces to trusted, authenticated users only, minimizing exposure to untrusted inputs. 2) Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious template injection patterns or unusual payloads targeting template rendering endpoints. 3) Conduct thorough input validation and sanitization on all user-supplied data that interacts with template engines, applying strict whitelisting where possible. 4) Monitor logs for anomalous template execution attempts or errors indicative of SSTI exploitation. 5) Plan for rapid deployment of official patches once available from Tiki Wiki maintainers. 6) Consider isolating Tiki Wiki servers within segmented network zones to limit potential lateral movement in case of compromise. 7) Educate administrators and developers on the risks of SSTI and secure coding practices related to template engines.

Description

[CVE-2025-32461] Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware <= 28.3 Two SSTI Vulnerabilities Source: https://karmainsecurity.com/KIS-2025-03

Impact

For European organizations using Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware, this vulnerability could have serious consequences. Many public sector institutions, educational organizations, and enterprises in Europe rely on Tiki Wiki for internal knowledge management and collaboration. Exploitation of these SSTI vulnerabilities could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive information, including personal data protected under GDPR, intellectual property, and internal communications. This could result in data breaches, regulatory fines, reputational damage, and operational disruptions. Additionally, compromised servers could be leveraged as pivot points for lateral movement within networks, increasing the risk of broader cyberattacks. The medium severity rating suggests that while exploitation may not be trivial, the impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is significant enough to warrant urgent attention. The absence of known exploits in the wild provides a window for proactive mitigation before widespread attacks occur.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 8 Jul 2025, 10:09 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats