VulnerabilityPublished 1 Jul 2025

CVE-2025-49482: ASR Falcon_Linux、Kestrel、Lapwing_Linux · Improper Resource Shutdown or Release

Affects ASR Falcon_Linux、Kestrel、Lapwing_LinuxSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.4 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 10:12 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.4Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 21% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: None
Availability: Low

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 1 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
ASR Falcon_Linux、Kestrel、Lapwing_Linux	Affected =0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Organizations should prioritize identifying and inventorying all ASR Falcon_Linux, Kestrel, and Lapwing_Linux devices, particularly ASR180x and ASR190x models, within their network infrastructure. Since no patches are currently linked, it is critical to monitor ASR vendor communications for updates or security advisories addressing this vulnerability. In the interim, network segmentation should be enforced to limit access to management interfaces using tr069 modules, restricting them to trusted administrative networks only. Implement strict access controls and network-level filtering to prevent unauthorized or low-privilege users from reaching vulnerable devices. Regularly monitor device performance metrics and logs for signs of resource exhaustion or abnormal behavior indicative of exploitation attempts. Employ intrusion detection systems (IDS) tuned to detect anomalous traffic patterns targeting tr069 services. Additionally, consider disabling or restricting tr069 management interfaces if they are not essential to operations. Establish incident response procedures to quickly address any signs of exploitation or device instability related to resource leaks.

Description

Improper Resource Shutdown or Release vulnerability in ASR180x 、ASR190x in tr069 modules allows Resource Leak Exposure. This vulnerability is associated with program files tr069/tr098.c. This issue affects Falcon_Linux、Kestrel、Lapwing_Linux: before v1536.

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to network infrastructure devices running the affected ASR products. Given that tr069 modules are used for remote management, exploitation could lead to resource leaks that degrade device performance or cause outages. This could impact availability of critical network services, potentially disrupting business operations, especially in sectors relying heavily on continuous network connectivity such as finance, telecommunications, and public services. Although the confidentiality and integrity impacts are low, the availability impact could lead to denial of service conditions if resource exhaustion occurs. This is particularly concerning for organizations with large-scale deployments of ASR devices or those in critical infrastructure sectors. The requirement for low privileges to exploit means that an attacker with limited access to the network could potentially trigger the vulnerability remotely without user interaction, increasing the risk of exploitation in internal networks. However, the absence of known exploits in the wild and the medium severity rating suggest that immediate widespread exploitation is unlikely but should not be disregarded.

CWE-404Improper Resource Shutdown or Release (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessLikelihood of exploit: Medium
The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use.
Requirements · Language Selection
Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Implementation
It is good practice to be responsible for freeing all resources you allocate and to be consistent with how and where you free memory in a function. If you allocate memory that you intend to free upon completion of the function, you must be sure to free the memory at all exit points for that function including error…
Implementation
Memory should be allocated/freed using matching functions such as malloc/free, new/delete, and new[]/delete[].
Attack patterns
TCP Fragmentation (opens in a new tab)
UDP Fragmentation (opens in a new tab)
ICMP Fragmentation (opens in a new tab)
BlueSmacking (opens in a new tab)
Flooding (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

asrmicro.com/en/goods/psirt?cid=40 (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 1 Jul 2025, 11:55 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-404

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats