CVE-2025-7070VulnerabilityPublished 4 Jul 2025Updated 8 Jul 2025

CVE-2025-7070: IROAD Dashcam Q9 · Allocation of Resources

Affects IROAD Dashcam Q9Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.9% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 61% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X

Attack Vector: Adjacent
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Adjacent: The vulnerable system is bound to a protocol stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared proximity (e.g., Bluetooth, NFC, or IEEE 802.11) or logical network (e.g., local IP subnet), or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN within an administrative network zone).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 4 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
IROAD Dashcam Q9	Affected =20250624	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Given the lack of vendor patches, European organizations should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Network Segmentation: Isolate dashcam devices on dedicated VLANs or subnets with strict access controls to limit local network exposure. 2) Access Control: Restrict network access to dashcams only to authorized management systems and personnel using firewall rules and network access control lists. 3) Monitoring and Detection: Deploy network monitoring tools to detect unusual traffic patterns or repeated pairing requests targeting the MFA Pairing Request Handler, which may indicate exploitation attempts. 4) Device Hardening: Disable any unnecessary network services on the dashcam devices if configurable, and ensure default credentials are changed to strong, unique passwords. 5) Incident Response Preparedness: Develop procedures to quickly isolate or reboot affected devices if signs of resource exhaustion or malfunction appear. 6) Vendor Engagement: Continue to engage with the vendor for patch releases and subscribe to security advisories for updates. 7) Alternative Solutions: Evaluate the feasibility of replacing vulnerable devices with models from vendors with better security track records if risk is unacceptable.

Description

A vulnerability has been found in IROAD Dashcam Q9 up to 20250624 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component MFA Pairing Request Handler. The manipulation leads to allocation of resources. The attack needs to be done within the local network. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

For European organizations, particularly those in transportation, logistics, or fleet management sectors that deploy IROAD Dashcam Q9 devices, this vulnerability poses a risk of service disruption. Dashcams are critical for recording driving events, supporting insurance claims, and ensuring driver accountability. Exploitation could lead to denial of service conditions, causing loss of video recording or interruption of real-time monitoring capabilities. This could result in operational downtime, loss of critical evidence in case of accidents, and potential liability issues. Since the attack requires local network access, organizations with less segmented or poorly secured internal networks are at higher risk. Additionally, organizations relying on these devices for compliance or safety monitoring may face regulatory or operational challenges if the devices become unreliable. The absence of vendor patches means that affected organizations must rely on network-level mitigations and monitoring to reduce risk.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…