CVE-2025-7108VulnerabilityPublished 7 Jul 2025

CVE-2025-7108: risesoft-y9 Digital-Infrastructure · Path Traversal

Affects risesoft-y9 Digital-InfrastructureSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 39% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 7 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubrisesoft-y9/Digital-Infrastructure`pkg:github/risesoft-y9/Digital-Infrastructure`Other threats	Affected =9.6.0 =9.6.1 =9.6.2 =9.6.3 =9.6.4 =9.6.5 =9.6.6 =9.6.7	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

1. Immediate mitigation should include restricting network access to the affected Digital-Infrastructure management interfaces using firewalls or network segmentation to limit exposure to trusted administrators only. 2. Implement strict input validation and sanitization at the application layer if possible, or deploy Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block path traversal attempts targeting the 'fullPath' parameter. 3. Monitor logs for suspicious deleteFile function calls or unusual file deletion activity to detect potential exploitation attempts early. 4. If feasible, temporarily disable or restrict the deleteFile functionality until a vendor patch or official fix is available. 5. Engage with the vendor or community to obtain any unofficial patches or workarounds. 6. Conduct a thorough audit of file permissions and backups to ensure rapid recovery in case of file deletion. 7. Prepare incident response plans specifically addressing potential exploitation of this vulnerability. 8. Consider deploying endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools to identify anomalous behavior related to file deletions on servers running the affected software.

Description

A vulnerability classified as critical was found in risesoft-y9 Digital-Infrastructure up to 9.6.7. Affected by this vulnerability is the function deleteFile of the file /Digital-Infrastructure-9.6.7/y9-digitalbase-webapp/y9-module-filemanager/risenet-y9boot-webapp-filemanager/src/main/java/net/risesoft/y9public/controller/Y9FileController.java. The manipulation of the argument fullPath leads to path traversal. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

For European organizations using risesoft-y9 Digital-Infrastructure versions 9.6.0 to 9.6.7, this vulnerability poses a tangible risk of unauthorized file deletion, potentially leading to service disruption, data loss, and operational downtime. Given that the vulnerability can be exploited remotely without user interaction, attackers could leverage this flaw to target critical infrastructure components managed by the affected software. This is particularly concerning for sectors such as government, finance, healthcare, and utilities, where data integrity and availability are paramount. The lack of vendor response and patches increases the window of exposure. Organizations relying on this product for digital infrastructure management may face compliance risks under European data protection regulations if data loss or service interruptions occur. Additionally, attackers could use this vulnerability as a foothold to escalate attacks within the network or disrupt business continuity.

Summary

CVE-2025-7108 is a path traversal vulnerability identified in the risesoft-y9 Digital-Infrastructure product versions 9.6.0 through 9.6.7. The flaw exists in the deleteFile function located in the Y9FileController.java source file within the y9-module-filemanager component. Specifically, the vulnerability arises from improper validation or sanitization of the 'fullPath' argument, which an attacker can manipulate to traverse directories outside the intended file system scope. This can allow an attacker to delete arbitrary files on the server remotely without authentication or user interaction. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable over the network, with no privileges or user interaction required, increasing its risk profile. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 5.3 (medium severity), reflecting the moderate impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, with low attack complexity but requiring some privileges (PR:L). The vendor was notified but has not responded or released a patch, and no known exploits have been observed in the wild yet. The public disclosure of the exploit code increases the risk of exploitation by threat actors. The vulnerability affects a critical file management function, potentially allowing attackers to delete important files, which could disrupt services, cause data loss, or facilitate further compromise if system or application files are targeted.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 7 Jul 2025, 17:39 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats