Malspam 2016-07-14 .wsf campaign
Malspam 2016-07-14 .wsf campaign
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The Malspam 2016-07-14 .wsf campaign refers to a malware distribution effort that utilized malicious spam emails containing Windows Script Files (.wsf) as the infection vector. These .wsf files are script files that can contain a combination of scripting languages such as VBScript and JScript, which when executed, can run arbitrary code on the victim's machine. The campaign was identified and reported by CIRCL in mid-2016. Although specific technical details about the payload or the exact infection mechanism are limited, the use of .wsf files in malspam campaigns typically aims to bypass traditional email security filters by leveraging script files that are less commonly blocked compared to executables or macros. The campaign's threat level was assessed as low, and there were no known exploits in the wild linked to this campaign at the time of reporting. The absence of affected versions or patch links suggests this campaign exploited social engineering and user interaction rather than software vulnerabilities. The campaign's low severity rating and lack of detailed technical indicators imply that while the threat was present, it likely had limited impact or reach. However, the use of .wsf files in malspam remains a relevant attack vector as it can lead to malware infections if users execute the attached scripts.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this malspam campaign would primarily revolve around potential malware infections resulting from user execution of malicious .wsf attachments. If successful, such infections could lead to unauthorized code execution, data compromise, or system disruption. However, given the low severity rating and lack of known exploits, the campaign likely had limited effectiveness. European organizations with robust email filtering, user awareness training, and endpoint protection would be less affected. Nonetheless, sectors with high email volumes and less mature security postures could have experienced localized infections. The campaign's reliance on user interaction means that the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of systems could be compromised if users were tricked into executing the scripts, but widespread impact is unlikely. The threat also underscores the importance of vigilance against script-based malware delivery methods in phishing emails.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate threats from .wsf malspam campaigns, European organizations should implement multi-layered defenses beyond generic advice: 1) Enhance email gateway filtering to specifically detect and block .wsf attachments or scripts, leveraging updated threat intelligence and heuristic analysis. 2) Deploy endpoint protection solutions capable of detecting and blocking script-based malware execution, including behavior-based detection of suspicious scripting activity. 3) Conduct targeted user awareness training emphasizing the risks of executing unsolicited email attachments, particularly script files like .wsf, and encourage verification of unexpected emails. 4) Implement application whitelisting policies that restrict execution of script files from email or temporary directories. 5) Monitor network traffic for unusual outbound connections that may indicate malware communication. 6) Regularly update and patch email clients and security tools to improve detection capabilities. 7) Employ sandboxing technologies to safely analyze suspicious email attachments before delivery to end users.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands
Malspam 2016-07-14 .wsf campaign
Description
Malspam 2016-07-14 .wsf campaign
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
The Malspam 2016-07-14 .wsf campaign refers to a malware distribution effort that utilized malicious spam emails containing Windows Script Files (.wsf) as the infection vector. These .wsf files are script files that can contain a combination of scripting languages such as VBScript and JScript, which when executed, can run arbitrary code on the victim's machine. The campaign was identified and reported by CIRCL in mid-2016. Although specific technical details about the payload or the exact infection mechanism are limited, the use of .wsf files in malspam campaigns typically aims to bypass traditional email security filters by leveraging script files that are less commonly blocked compared to executables or macros. The campaign's threat level was assessed as low, and there were no known exploits in the wild linked to this campaign at the time of reporting. The absence of affected versions or patch links suggests this campaign exploited social engineering and user interaction rather than software vulnerabilities. The campaign's low severity rating and lack of detailed technical indicators imply that while the threat was present, it likely had limited impact or reach. However, the use of .wsf files in malspam remains a relevant attack vector as it can lead to malware infections if users execute the attached scripts.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this malspam campaign would primarily revolve around potential malware infections resulting from user execution of malicious .wsf attachments. If successful, such infections could lead to unauthorized code execution, data compromise, or system disruption. However, given the low severity rating and lack of known exploits, the campaign likely had limited effectiveness. European organizations with robust email filtering, user awareness training, and endpoint protection would be less affected. Nonetheless, sectors with high email volumes and less mature security postures could have experienced localized infections. The campaign's reliance on user interaction means that the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of systems could be compromised if users were tricked into executing the scripts, but widespread impact is unlikely. The threat also underscores the importance of vigilance against script-based malware delivery methods in phishing emails.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate threats from .wsf malspam campaigns, European organizations should implement multi-layered defenses beyond generic advice: 1) Enhance email gateway filtering to specifically detect and block .wsf attachments or scripts, leveraging updated threat intelligence and heuristic analysis. 2) Deploy endpoint protection solutions capable of detecting and blocking script-based malware execution, including behavior-based detection of suspicious scripting activity. 3) Conduct targeted user awareness training emphasizing the risks of executing unsolicited email attachments, particularly script files like .wsf, and encourage verification of unexpected emails. 4) Implement application whitelisting policies that restrict execution of script files from email or temporary directories. 5) Monitor network traffic for unusual outbound connections that may indicate malware communication. 6) Regularly update and patch email clients and security tools to improve detection capabilities. 7) Employ sandboxing technologies to safely analyze suspicious email attachments before delivery to end users.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Threat Level
- 3
- Analysis
- 0
- Original Timestamp
- 1468489592
Threat ID: 682acdbcbbaf20d303f0b4e9
Added to database: 5/19/2025, 6:20:44 AM
Last enriched: 7/3/2025, 12:27:58 AM
Last updated: 8/10/2025, 9:10:21 PM
Views: 9
Related Threats
Building a Free Library for Phishing & Security Awareness Training — Looking for Feedback!
LowThreatFox IOCs for 2025-08-14
MediumThreatFox IOCs for 2025-08-13
MediumThreatFox IOCs for 2025-08-12
MediumThreatFox IOCs for 2025-08-11
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.