Malspam 2016-07-18 .wsf->.gif (campaign: "RE: firstname.lastname")
Malspam 2016-07-18 .wsf->.gif (campaign: "RE: firstname.lastname")
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The analyzed threat pertains to a malspam campaign identified on July 18, 2016, which utilized a social engineering technique involving emails with subject lines formatted as "RE: firstname.lastname" to entice recipients to open malicious attachments. The attachments were disguised by using a double extension technique, where a Windows Script File (.wsf) was renamed with a .gif extension, misleading users into believing the file was a harmless image. Upon execution, the .wsf file could run arbitrary scripts on the victim's machine, potentially leading to malware infection or further compromise. The campaign leveraged the trust associated with reply-style email subjects to increase the likelihood of user interaction. Despite the low severity rating assigned, the threat represents a classic vector for initial infection, relying heavily on user interaction and social engineering rather than exploiting technical vulnerabilities. No specific affected software versions or exploits in the wild were reported, and no detailed technical indicators or CWEs were provided. The threat level was noted as moderate (3 on an unspecified scale), but the lack of active exploitation and the reliance on user action reduce its overall risk profile.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this malspam campaign poses a risk primarily through the potential for initial compromise via user interaction. If successful, it could lead to unauthorized code execution, data exfiltration, or the deployment of additional malware payloads. The impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability depends on the payload delivered post-execution, which is unspecified. However, given the low severity and absence of known exploits in the wild, the immediate risk is limited. Nonetheless, organizations with large user bases and less mature email filtering or user awareness programs could see higher susceptibility. The campaign's social engineering approach could bypass technical controls if users are not adequately trained. Additionally, sectors with high email communication volumes or those targeted by phishing campaigns, such as finance, government, and critical infrastructure in Europe, could be more vulnerable to such malspam tactics.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate this threat effectively, European organizations should implement advanced email filtering solutions capable of detecting and quarantining suspicious attachments, especially those using double extensions or uncommon file types like .wsf. User awareness training should emphasize the risks of opening unexpected attachments, particularly those with misleading file extensions or unsolicited reply-style subject lines. Endpoint protection platforms should be configured to detect and block script-based malware execution. Organizations should enforce strict attachment handling policies, such as disabling execution of script files received via email and employing sandboxing technologies to analyze attachments before delivery. Regular updates to antivirus and antimalware signatures are essential. Additionally, implementing application whitelisting can prevent unauthorized script execution. Monitoring email traffic for patterns consistent with this campaign can aid in early detection and response.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Belgium
Malspam 2016-07-18 .wsf->.gif (campaign: "RE: firstname.lastname")
Description
Malspam 2016-07-18 .wsf->.gif (campaign: "RE: firstname.lastname")
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
The analyzed threat pertains to a malspam campaign identified on July 18, 2016, which utilized a social engineering technique involving emails with subject lines formatted as "RE: firstname.lastname" to entice recipients to open malicious attachments. The attachments were disguised by using a double extension technique, where a Windows Script File (.wsf) was renamed with a .gif extension, misleading users into believing the file was a harmless image. Upon execution, the .wsf file could run arbitrary scripts on the victim's machine, potentially leading to malware infection or further compromise. The campaign leveraged the trust associated with reply-style email subjects to increase the likelihood of user interaction. Despite the low severity rating assigned, the threat represents a classic vector for initial infection, relying heavily on user interaction and social engineering rather than exploiting technical vulnerabilities. No specific affected software versions or exploits in the wild were reported, and no detailed technical indicators or CWEs were provided. The threat level was noted as moderate (3 on an unspecified scale), but the lack of active exploitation and the reliance on user action reduce its overall risk profile.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this malspam campaign poses a risk primarily through the potential for initial compromise via user interaction. If successful, it could lead to unauthorized code execution, data exfiltration, or the deployment of additional malware payloads. The impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability depends on the payload delivered post-execution, which is unspecified. However, given the low severity and absence of known exploits in the wild, the immediate risk is limited. Nonetheless, organizations with large user bases and less mature email filtering or user awareness programs could see higher susceptibility. The campaign's social engineering approach could bypass technical controls if users are not adequately trained. Additionally, sectors with high email communication volumes or those targeted by phishing campaigns, such as finance, government, and critical infrastructure in Europe, could be more vulnerable to such malspam tactics.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate this threat effectively, European organizations should implement advanced email filtering solutions capable of detecting and quarantining suspicious attachments, especially those using double extensions or uncommon file types like .wsf. User awareness training should emphasize the risks of opening unexpected attachments, particularly those with misleading file extensions or unsolicited reply-style subject lines. Endpoint protection platforms should be configured to detect and block script-based malware execution. Organizations should enforce strict attachment handling policies, such as disabling execution of script files received via email and employing sandboxing technologies to analyze attachments before delivery. Regular updates to antivirus and antimalware signatures are essential. Additionally, implementing application whitelisting can prevent unauthorized script execution. Monitoring email traffic for patterns consistent with this campaign can aid in early detection and response.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Threat Level
- 3
- Analysis
- 0
- Original Timestamp
- 1468848886
Threat ID: 682acdbcbbaf20d303f0b4ef
Added to database: 5/19/2025, 6:20:44 AM
Last enriched: 7/3/2025, 12:25:53 AM
Last updated: 8/13/2025, 12:08:33 AM
Views: 9
Related Threats
ThreatFox IOCs for 2025-08-16
MediumThreatFox IOCs for 2025-08-15
MediumBuilding a Free Library for Phishing & Security Awareness Training — Looking for Feedback!
LowThreatFox IOCs for 2025-08-14
MediumThreatFox IOCs for 2025-08-13
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.