Malspam 2016-08-16 (.wsf in .zip) - campaign: 'Blank 2'
Malspam 2016-08-16 (.wsf in .zip) - campaign: 'Blank 2'
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The provided information describes a malspam campaign identified on August 16, 2016, referred to as 'Blank 2'. This campaign involved the distribution of malicious spam emails containing a .zip archive, which in turn contained a .wsf (Windows Script File). The .wsf file format is a legitimate Windows scripting format that can execute scripts using Windows Script Host, often used by attackers to deliver and execute malicious code stealthily. The malspam campaign likely aimed to trick recipients into opening the .zip archive and executing the .wsf file, thereby compromising the victim's system. However, the available data lacks detailed technical indicators such as payload behavior, infection vectors, or command and control infrastructure. The campaign is classified as malware with a low severity rating by the source, and there is no evidence of known exploits in the wild or active exploitation beyond the spam distribution. The threat level is noted as 3 on an unspecified scale, and no specific affected software versions or patches are indicated. Overall, this represents a typical malspam-based malware delivery attempt leveraging social engineering and script-based payloads common in 2016.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this malspam campaign is generally low but non-negligible. If successful, execution of the .wsf file could lead to system compromise, potentially allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code, download additional malware, or establish persistence. This could result in data theft, disruption of operations, or further lateral movement within networks. However, the low severity rating and absence of known widespread exploitation suggest limited impact. Organizations with strong email filtering, user awareness, and endpoint protection would likely mitigate this threat effectively. Nonetheless, sectors with high volumes of external email communications or less mature cybersecurity postures could face increased risk. The campaign's age (2016) also implies that modern defenses and updated user training may have reduced its effectiveness over time.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate this threat, European organizations should implement targeted measures beyond generic advice: 1) Enhance email filtering rules to detect and quarantine emails containing suspicious attachments, especially .zip files with script-based payloads like .wsf. 2) Deploy endpoint protection solutions capable of detecting and blocking execution of unauthorized script files and monitor Windows Script Host activity for anomalies. 3) Conduct focused user awareness training emphasizing the risks of opening unexpected compressed attachments and executing scripts from untrusted sources. 4) Implement application whitelisting to restrict execution of script files unless explicitly approved. 5) Regularly review and update incident response playbooks to include malspam scenarios involving script-based malware. 6) Monitor network traffic for unusual outbound connections that could indicate malware communication. These steps, combined with standard cybersecurity hygiene, will reduce the likelihood and impact of similar malspam campaigns.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Belgium
Malspam 2016-08-16 (.wsf in .zip) - campaign: 'Blank 2'
Description
Malspam 2016-08-16 (.wsf in .zip) - campaign: 'Blank 2'
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
The provided information describes a malspam campaign identified on August 16, 2016, referred to as 'Blank 2'. This campaign involved the distribution of malicious spam emails containing a .zip archive, which in turn contained a .wsf (Windows Script File). The .wsf file format is a legitimate Windows scripting format that can execute scripts using Windows Script Host, often used by attackers to deliver and execute malicious code stealthily. The malspam campaign likely aimed to trick recipients into opening the .zip archive and executing the .wsf file, thereby compromising the victim's system. However, the available data lacks detailed technical indicators such as payload behavior, infection vectors, or command and control infrastructure. The campaign is classified as malware with a low severity rating by the source, and there is no evidence of known exploits in the wild or active exploitation beyond the spam distribution. The threat level is noted as 3 on an unspecified scale, and no specific affected software versions or patches are indicated. Overall, this represents a typical malspam-based malware delivery attempt leveraging social engineering and script-based payloads common in 2016.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this malspam campaign is generally low but non-negligible. If successful, execution of the .wsf file could lead to system compromise, potentially allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code, download additional malware, or establish persistence. This could result in data theft, disruption of operations, or further lateral movement within networks. However, the low severity rating and absence of known widespread exploitation suggest limited impact. Organizations with strong email filtering, user awareness, and endpoint protection would likely mitigate this threat effectively. Nonetheless, sectors with high volumes of external email communications or less mature cybersecurity postures could face increased risk. The campaign's age (2016) also implies that modern defenses and updated user training may have reduced its effectiveness over time.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate this threat, European organizations should implement targeted measures beyond generic advice: 1) Enhance email filtering rules to detect and quarantine emails containing suspicious attachments, especially .zip files with script-based payloads like .wsf. 2) Deploy endpoint protection solutions capable of detecting and blocking execution of unauthorized script files and monitor Windows Script Host activity for anomalies. 3) Conduct focused user awareness training emphasizing the risks of opening unexpected compressed attachments and executing scripts from untrusted sources. 4) Implement application whitelisting to restrict execution of script files unless explicitly approved. 5) Regularly review and update incident response playbooks to include malspam scenarios involving script-based malware. 6) Monitor network traffic for unusual outbound connections that could indicate malware communication. These steps, combined with standard cybersecurity hygiene, will reduce the likelihood and impact of similar malspam campaigns.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Threat Level
- 3
- Analysis
- 0
- Original Timestamp
- 1471357948
Threat ID: 682acdbdbbaf20d303f0b751
Added to database: 5/19/2025, 6:20:45 AM
Last enriched: 7/2/2025, 8:25:01 PM
Last updated: 8/11/2025, 9:35:25 PM
Views: 12
Related Threats
ThreatFox IOCs for 2025-08-17
MediumThreatFox IOCs for 2025-08-16
MediumThreatFox IOCs for 2025-08-15
MediumBuilding a Free Library for Phishing & Security Awareness Training — Looking for Feedback!
LowThreatFox IOCs for 2025-08-14
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.