Skip to main content

Malspam 2016-08-16 (.wsf in .zip) - campaign: 'Blank 2'

Low
Published: Tue Aug 16 2016 (08/16/2016, 00:00:00 UTC)
Source: CIRCL
Vendor/Project: tlp
Product: white

Description

Malspam 2016-08-16 (.wsf in .zip) - campaign: 'Blank 2'

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 07/02/2025, 20:25:01 UTC

Technical Analysis

The provided information describes a malspam campaign identified on August 16, 2016, referred to as 'Blank 2'. This campaign involved the distribution of malicious spam emails containing a .zip archive, which in turn contained a .wsf (Windows Script File). The .wsf file format is a legitimate Windows scripting format that can execute scripts using Windows Script Host, often used by attackers to deliver and execute malicious code stealthily. The malspam campaign likely aimed to trick recipients into opening the .zip archive and executing the .wsf file, thereby compromising the victim's system. However, the available data lacks detailed technical indicators such as payload behavior, infection vectors, or command and control infrastructure. The campaign is classified as malware with a low severity rating by the source, and there is no evidence of known exploits in the wild or active exploitation beyond the spam distribution. The threat level is noted as 3 on an unspecified scale, and no specific affected software versions or patches are indicated. Overall, this represents a typical malspam-based malware delivery attempt leveraging social engineering and script-based payloads common in 2016.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the impact of this malspam campaign is generally low but non-negligible. If successful, execution of the .wsf file could lead to system compromise, potentially allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code, download additional malware, or establish persistence. This could result in data theft, disruption of operations, or further lateral movement within networks. However, the low severity rating and absence of known widespread exploitation suggest limited impact. Organizations with strong email filtering, user awareness, and endpoint protection would likely mitigate this threat effectively. Nonetheless, sectors with high volumes of external email communications or less mature cybersecurity postures could face increased risk. The campaign's age (2016) also implies that modern defenses and updated user training may have reduced its effectiveness over time.

Mitigation Recommendations

To mitigate this threat, European organizations should implement targeted measures beyond generic advice: 1) Enhance email filtering rules to detect and quarantine emails containing suspicious attachments, especially .zip files with script-based payloads like .wsf. 2) Deploy endpoint protection solutions capable of detecting and blocking execution of unauthorized script files and monitor Windows Script Host activity for anomalies. 3) Conduct focused user awareness training emphasizing the risks of opening unexpected compressed attachments and executing scripts from untrusted sources. 4) Implement application whitelisting to restrict execution of script files unless explicitly approved. 5) Regularly review and update incident response playbooks to include malspam scenarios involving script-based malware. 6) Monitor network traffic for unusual outbound connections that could indicate malware communication. These steps, combined with standard cybersecurity hygiene, will reduce the likelihood and impact of similar malspam campaigns.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Threat Level
3
Analysis
0
Original Timestamp
1471357948

Threat ID: 682acdbdbbaf20d303f0b751

Added to database: 5/19/2025, 6:20:45 AM

Last enriched: 7/2/2025, 8:25:01 PM

Last updated: 8/11/2025, 9:35:25 PM

Views: 12

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

External Links

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats