SOC files: an APT41 attack on government IT services in Africa
Chinese cyberespionage group APT41 conducted a targeted attack against government IT services in Africa. The attackers used various tools including Impacket, Cobalt Strike, and custom malware for lateral movement, privilege escalation, and data exfiltration. They leveraged DLL sideloading techniques and a compromised SharePoint server as a command and control center. The attack involved credential harvesting, use of web shells, and custom stealers to collect sensitive data. Notable TTPs included using hardcoded internal service names and proxy servers in malware, and exploiting a captive SharePoint server for C2 communication. The incident highlights the importance of comprehensive infrastructure monitoring and proper access controls.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The reported threat involves a targeted cyberespionage campaign conducted by the Chinese state-sponsored group APT41 against government IT services in Africa. The attackers employed a sophisticated multi-stage intrusion leveraging a combination of publicly available tools and custom malware to achieve lateral movement, privilege escalation, and data exfiltration. Key tools included Impacket, a well-known toolkit for network protocol manipulation; Cobalt Strike, a commercial penetration testing framework frequently abused by threat actors for command and control (C2) and post-exploitation activities; and custom-developed malware components tailored for credential harvesting and data theft. The adversaries exploited DLL sideloading techniques, which involve placing malicious DLLs alongside legitimate executables to bypass security controls and evade detection. A compromised SharePoint server was used as a covert C2 infrastructure, enabling stealthy communication and control of infected hosts. The attackers also deployed web shells on compromised servers to maintain persistent access and facilitate remote command execution. Notably, the malware contained hardcoded internal service names and proxy server configurations, indicating a high level of reconnaissance and customization for the targeted environment. Credential harvesting was performed using tools such as Mimikatz, allowing the attackers to extract plaintext credentials and escalate privileges within the network. The campaign underscores the importance of comprehensive monitoring of infrastructure components, especially SharePoint and web servers, strict access control policies, and the need for detection mechanisms targeting DLL sideloading and web shell activity. Although no direct exploits or zero-days were reported, the use of advanced TTPs (tactics, techniques, and procedures) and the targeting of government IT services highlight the threat's sophistication and potential impact.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, particularly government entities and critical infrastructure providers, this threat exemplifies the risks posed by advanced persistent threat groups leveraging similar tactics. While the campaign specifically targeted African government IT services, the techniques used—such as DLL sideloading, exploitation of SharePoint servers, and use of Cobalt Strike—are applicable globally and could be adapted against European targets. Successful compromise could lead to significant confidentiality breaches involving sensitive governmental data, disruption of IT services, and potential manipulation or destruction of critical information. The use of credential harvesting tools like Mimikatz increases the risk of lateral movement and widespread network compromise. Additionally, the stealthy use of web shells and custom malware complicates detection and remediation efforts. European organizations with SharePoint deployments and legacy systems may be particularly vulnerable if proper security controls are not in place. The geopolitical context of Chinese cyberespionage targeting government services also raises concerns about espionage and intellectual property theft within Europe. Overall, the impact could range from data loss and operational disruption to long-term espionage campaigns affecting national security and public trust.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate this threat effectively, European organizations should implement a multi-layered defense strategy tailored to the specific TTPs observed: 1) Harden SharePoint and web server environments by applying the latest security patches, disabling unnecessary features, and enforcing strict access controls and authentication mechanisms. 2) Deploy advanced endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions capable of detecting DLL sideloading behaviors and anomalous process executions. 3) Monitor network traffic for unusual patterns indicative of Cobalt Strike beaconing or proxy-based C2 communications, including encrypted or obfuscated traffic to internal services. 4) Conduct regular credential hygiene practices, including frequent password changes, use of multi-factor authentication (MFA), and monitoring for credential dumping activities using tools like Mimikatz. 5) Implement comprehensive logging and monitoring of server-side scripts and web shells, employing integrity checks and anomaly detection to identify unauthorized modifications. 6) Perform regular threat hunting exercises focused on known APT41 indicators and TTPs, leveraging threat intelligence feeds and sharing information with relevant cybersecurity communities. 7) Segment networks to limit lateral movement opportunities and restrict administrative privileges to the minimum necessary. 8) Educate IT and security personnel on the latest attack techniques and ensure incident response plans are updated to address advanced persistent threats. These measures, combined with continuous vigilance and threat intelligence integration, will reduce the risk and impact of similar attacks.
Affected Countries
France, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Belgium, Netherlands, Poland
Indicators of Compromise
- hash: 100b463eff8295ba617d3ad6df5325c6
- hash: 125b257520d16d759b112399c3cd1466
- hash: 15097a32b515d10ad6d793d2d820f2a8
- hash: 27f506b198e7f5530c649b6e4860c958
- hash: 2cd15977b72d5d74fadedfde2ce8934f
- hash: 2f9d2d8c4f2c50cc4d2e156b9985e7ca
- hash: 3021c9bca4ef3aa672461ecadc4718e6
- hash: 3af014db9be1a04e8b312b55d4479f69
- hash: 4708a2ae3a5f008c87e68ed04a081f18
- hash: 740d6eb97329944d82317849f9bbd633
- hash: 91d10c25497cadb7249d47ae8ec94766
- hash: 9b00b6f93b70f09d8b35fa9a22b3cba1
- hash: 9b4f0f94133650b19474af6b5709e773
- hash: 9d53a0336acfb9e4df11162ccf7383a0
- hash: a052536e671c513221f788de2e62316c
- hash: a236dce873845ba4d3ccd8d5a4e1aefd
- hash: c149252a0a3b1f5724fd76f704a1e0af
- hash: c3ed337e2891736db6334a5f1d37dc0f
- hash: c7188c39b5c53ecbd3aec77a856ddf0c
- hash: f1025fcad036aad8bf124df8c9650bbc
- hash: 54ce0437b0946132041d4ffc34c6a7cae30829c1
- hash: a198565f40b1d9a60d26e691423793f883a7d888
- hash: bc9572e65e4dd4aaec37563a902e710c7504fa394a96437a77fd742ccfa28dc9
- hash: c8ffacb598ba8505b189b0e06906c78959d49839d4dc8ac201a3c9874f6af609
- ip: 38.175.195.13
- url: http://chyedweeyaxkavyccenwjvqrsgvyj0o1y.oast.fun/aaa
- url: http://github.githubassets.net/okaqbfk867hmx2tvqxhc8zyq9fy694gf/hta
- url: http://toun.callback.red/aaa
- hash: 4e70b571f4c0cf51dfd31c5ed8cc58cd9cfa4d7f
- domain: azure.online
- domain: msn-microsoft.org
- domain: s3-azure.com
- domain: upload-microsoft.com
- domain: ap-northeast-1.s3-azure.com
- domain: chyedweeyaxkavyccenwjvqrsgvyj0o1y.oast.fun
- domain: github.githubassets.net
- domain: ns1.s3-azure.com
- domain: ns2.s3-azure.com
- domain: toun.callback.red
- domain: www.msn-microsoft.org
- domain: www.upload-microsoft.com
SOC files: an APT41 attack on government IT services in Africa
Description
Chinese cyberespionage group APT41 conducted a targeted attack against government IT services in Africa. The attackers used various tools including Impacket, Cobalt Strike, and custom malware for lateral movement, privilege escalation, and data exfiltration. They leveraged DLL sideloading techniques and a compromised SharePoint server as a command and control center. The attack involved credential harvesting, use of web shells, and custom stealers to collect sensitive data. Notable TTPs included using hardcoded internal service names and proxy servers in malware, and exploiting a captive SharePoint server for C2 communication. The incident highlights the importance of comprehensive infrastructure monitoring and proper access controls.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
The reported threat involves a targeted cyberespionage campaign conducted by the Chinese state-sponsored group APT41 against government IT services in Africa. The attackers employed a sophisticated multi-stage intrusion leveraging a combination of publicly available tools and custom malware to achieve lateral movement, privilege escalation, and data exfiltration. Key tools included Impacket, a well-known toolkit for network protocol manipulation; Cobalt Strike, a commercial penetration testing framework frequently abused by threat actors for command and control (C2) and post-exploitation activities; and custom-developed malware components tailored for credential harvesting and data theft. The adversaries exploited DLL sideloading techniques, which involve placing malicious DLLs alongside legitimate executables to bypass security controls and evade detection. A compromised SharePoint server was used as a covert C2 infrastructure, enabling stealthy communication and control of infected hosts. The attackers also deployed web shells on compromised servers to maintain persistent access and facilitate remote command execution. Notably, the malware contained hardcoded internal service names and proxy server configurations, indicating a high level of reconnaissance and customization for the targeted environment. Credential harvesting was performed using tools such as Mimikatz, allowing the attackers to extract plaintext credentials and escalate privileges within the network. The campaign underscores the importance of comprehensive monitoring of infrastructure components, especially SharePoint and web servers, strict access control policies, and the need for detection mechanisms targeting DLL sideloading and web shell activity. Although no direct exploits or zero-days were reported, the use of advanced TTPs (tactics, techniques, and procedures) and the targeting of government IT services highlight the threat's sophistication and potential impact.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, particularly government entities and critical infrastructure providers, this threat exemplifies the risks posed by advanced persistent threat groups leveraging similar tactics. While the campaign specifically targeted African government IT services, the techniques used—such as DLL sideloading, exploitation of SharePoint servers, and use of Cobalt Strike—are applicable globally and could be adapted against European targets. Successful compromise could lead to significant confidentiality breaches involving sensitive governmental data, disruption of IT services, and potential manipulation or destruction of critical information. The use of credential harvesting tools like Mimikatz increases the risk of lateral movement and widespread network compromise. Additionally, the stealthy use of web shells and custom malware complicates detection and remediation efforts. European organizations with SharePoint deployments and legacy systems may be particularly vulnerable if proper security controls are not in place. The geopolitical context of Chinese cyberespionage targeting government services also raises concerns about espionage and intellectual property theft within Europe. Overall, the impact could range from data loss and operational disruption to long-term espionage campaigns affecting national security and public trust.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate this threat effectively, European organizations should implement a multi-layered defense strategy tailored to the specific TTPs observed: 1) Harden SharePoint and web server environments by applying the latest security patches, disabling unnecessary features, and enforcing strict access controls and authentication mechanisms. 2) Deploy advanced endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions capable of detecting DLL sideloading behaviors and anomalous process executions. 3) Monitor network traffic for unusual patterns indicative of Cobalt Strike beaconing or proxy-based C2 communications, including encrypted or obfuscated traffic to internal services. 4) Conduct regular credential hygiene practices, including frequent password changes, use of multi-factor authentication (MFA), and monitoring for credential dumping activities using tools like Mimikatz. 5) Implement comprehensive logging and monitoring of server-side scripts and web shells, employing integrity checks and anomaly detection to identify unauthorized modifications. 6) Perform regular threat hunting exercises focused on known APT41 indicators and TTPs, leveraging threat intelligence feeds and sharing information with relevant cybersecurity communities. 7) Segment networks to limit lateral movement opportunities and restrict administrative privileges to the minimum necessary. 8) Educate IT and security personnel on the latest attack techniques and ensure incident response plans are updated to address advanced persistent threats. These measures, combined with continuous vigilance and threat intelligence integration, will reduce the risk and impact of similar attacks.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Author
- AlienVault
- Tlp
- white
- References
- ["https://securelist.com/apt41-in-africa/116986/"]
- Adversary
- APT41
- Pulse Id
- 687e0dfc3d01c46d9a3c790b
- Threat Score
- null
Indicators of Compromise
Hash
Value | Description | Copy |
---|---|---|
hash100b463eff8295ba617d3ad6df5325c6 | — | |
hash125b257520d16d759b112399c3cd1466 | — | |
hash15097a32b515d10ad6d793d2d820f2a8 | — | |
hash27f506b198e7f5530c649b6e4860c958 | — | |
hash2cd15977b72d5d74fadedfde2ce8934f | — | |
hash2f9d2d8c4f2c50cc4d2e156b9985e7ca | — | |
hash3021c9bca4ef3aa672461ecadc4718e6 | — | |
hash3af014db9be1a04e8b312b55d4479f69 | — | |
hash4708a2ae3a5f008c87e68ed04a081f18 | — | |
hash740d6eb97329944d82317849f9bbd633 | — | |
hash91d10c25497cadb7249d47ae8ec94766 | — | |
hash9b00b6f93b70f09d8b35fa9a22b3cba1 | — | |
hash9b4f0f94133650b19474af6b5709e773 | — | |
hash9d53a0336acfb9e4df11162ccf7383a0 | — | |
hasha052536e671c513221f788de2e62316c | — | |
hasha236dce873845ba4d3ccd8d5a4e1aefd | — | |
hashc149252a0a3b1f5724fd76f704a1e0af | — | |
hashc3ed337e2891736db6334a5f1d37dc0f | — | |
hashc7188c39b5c53ecbd3aec77a856ddf0c | — | |
hashf1025fcad036aad8bf124df8c9650bbc | — | |
hash54ce0437b0946132041d4ffc34c6a7cae30829c1 | — | |
hasha198565f40b1d9a60d26e691423793f883a7d888 | — | |
hashbc9572e65e4dd4aaec37563a902e710c7504fa394a96437a77fd742ccfa28dc9 | — | |
hashc8ffacb598ba8505b189b0e06906c78959d49839d4dc8ac201a3c9874f6af609 | — | |
hash4e70b571f4c0cf51dfd31c5ed8cc58cd9cfa4d7f | — |
Ip
Value | Description | Copy |
---|---|---|
ip38.175.195.13 | — |
Url
Value | Description | Copy |
---|---|---|
urlhttp://chyedweeyaxkavyccenwjvqrsgvyj0o1y.oast.fun/aaa | — | |
urlhttp://github.githubassets.net/okaqbfk867hmx2tvqxhc8zyq9fy694gf/hta | — | |
urlhttp://toun.callback.red/aaa | — |
Domain
Value | Description | Copy |
---|---|---|
domainazure.online | — | |
domainmsn-microsoft.org | — | |
domains3-azure.com | — | |
domainupload-microsoft.com | — | |
domainap-northeast-1.s3-azure.com | — | |
domainchyedweeyaxkavyccenwjvqrsgvyj0o1y.oast.fun | — | |
domaingithub.githubassets.net | — | |
domainns1.s3-azure.com | — | |
domainns2.s3-azure.com | — | |
domaintoun.callback.red | — | |
domainwww.msn-microsoft.org | — | |
domainwww.upload-microsoft.com | — |
Threat ID: 687e24f8a83201eaac0ebeb5
Added to database: 7/21/2025, 11:31:04 AM
Last enriched: 8/21/2025, 12:33:04 AM
Last updated: 9/4/2025, 12:37:38 PM
Views: 51
Related Threats
GhostRedirector poisons Windows servers: Backdoors with a side of Potatoes
MediumThreatFox IOCs for 2025-09-04
MediumRussian APT28 Deploys “NotDoor” Backdoor Through Microsoft Outlook
MediumAn Analysis of the AMOS Stealer Campaign Targeting macOS via 'Cracked' Apps
MediumSubverting code integrity checks to locally backdoor Signal, 1Password, Slack, and more
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.