CVE-1999-0061: File creation and deletion, and remote execution, in the BSD line printer daemon (lpd).
File creation and deletion, and remote execution, in the BSD line printer daemon (lpd).
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0061 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting the BSD line printer daemon (lpd), a service responsible for managing print jobs on BSD operating systems. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to create and delete files arbitrarily and execute commands remotely via the lpd service. This occurs because the lpd daemon does not properly validate input or restrict file operations, enabling attackers to manipulate the file system and execute code with the privileges of the lpd process. The affected versions include BSD OS versions 2.1, 6.2, and 2.6.20.1, which are legacy systems dating back to the late 1990s. The CVSS score of 5.1 reflects a medium impact, with network attack vector, high attack complexity, no authentication required, and partial impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No patches are available for this vulnerability, and there are no known exploits in the wild, likely due to the age and declining use of these BSD versions. However, the vulnerability remains relevant for legacy systems still in operation, especially in environments where lpd is enabled and exposed to untrusted networks.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends largely on the presence of legacy BSD systems running vulnerable versions of the lpd daemon. If such systems are still in use, an attacker could remotely execute arbitrary commands, leading to unauthorized access, data manipulation, or denial of service. This could compromise sensitive data confidentiality and integrity, disrupt printing services critical to business operations, and potentially serve as a foothold for further network intrusion. Given the lack of patches, organizations relying on these legacy systems face increased risk, especially if the lpd service is exposed to external networks without proper segmentation or firewall controls. The impact is heightened in sectors with strict data protection regulations, such as finance, healthcare, and government, where unauthorized access could lead to regulatory penalties and reputational damage.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given the absence of official patches, European organizations should prioritize the following mitigations: 1) Disable the lpd service on all BSD systems unless absolutely necessary. 2) If printing services are required, replace lpd with modern, actively maintained printing systems that have robust security controls. 3) Restrict network access to the lpd service using firewalls or network segmentation to limit exposure to trusted internal networks only. 4) Monitor network traffic for unusual activity targeting port 515 (default lpd port) and implement intrusion detection/prevention systems to detect exploitation attempts. 5) For legacy systems that cannot be upgraded, consider deploying compensating controls such as application-layer proxies or wrappers that validate and sanitize input to the lpd daemon. 6) Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify any remaining vulnerable systems and plan for their decommissioning or upgrade.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Poland
CVE-1999-0061: File creation and deletion, and remote execution, in the BSD line printer daemon (lpd).
Description
File creation and deletion, and remote execution, in the BSD line printer daemon (lpd).
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0061 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting the BSD line printer daemon (lpd), a service responsible for managing print jobs on BSD operating systems. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to create and delete files arbitrarily and execute commands remotely via the lpd service. This occurs because the lpd daemon does not properly validate input or restrict file operations, enabling attackers to manipulate the file system and execute code with the privileges of the lpd process. The affected versions include BSD OS versions 2.1, 6.2, and 2.6.20.1, which are legacy systems dating back to the late 1990s. The CVSS score of 5.1 reflects a medium impact, with network attack vector, high attack complexity, no authentication required, and partial impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No patches are available for this vulnerability, and there are no known exploits in the wild, likely due to the age and declining use of these BSD versions. However, the vulnerability remains relevant for legacy systems still in operation, especially in environments where lpd is enabled and exposed to untrusted networks.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends largely on the presence of legacy BSD systems running vulnerable versions of the lpd daemon. If such systems are still in use, an attacker could remotely execute arbitrary commands, leading to unauthorized access, data manipulation, or denial of service. This could compromise sensitive data confidentiality and integrity, disrupt printing services critical to business operations, and potentially serve as a foothold for further network intrusion. Given the lack of patches, organizations relying on these legacy systems face increased risk, especially if the lpd service is exposed to external networks without proper segmentation or firewall controls. The impact is heightened in sectors with strict data protection regulations, such as finance, healthcare, and government, where unauthorized access could lead to regulatory penalties and reputational damage.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given the absence of official patches, European organizations should prioritize the following mitigations: 1) Disable the lpd service on all BSD systems unless absolutely necessary. 2) If printing services are required, replace lpd with modern, actively maintained printing systems that have robust security controls. 3) Restrict network access to the lpd service using firewalls or network segmentation to limit exposure to trusted internal networks only. 4) Monitor network traffic for unusual activity targeting port 515 (default lpd port) and implement intrusion detection/prevention systems to detect exploitation attempts. 5) For legacy systems that cannot be upgraded, consider deploying compensating controls such as application-layer proxies or wrappers that validate and sanitize input to the lpd daemon. 6) Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify any remaining vulnerable systems and plan for their decommissioning or upgrade.
Affected Countries
Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7de806
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 11:12:28 PM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 4:49:14 AM
Views: 37
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-2073: SQL Injection in itsourcecode School Management System
MediumCVE-2025-31990: CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in HCLSoftware HCL DevOps Velocity
MediumCVE-2026-2069: Stack-based Buffer Overflow in ggml-org llama.cpp
MediumCVE-2026-25760: CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in BishopFox sliver
MediumCVE-2026-25574: CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in payloadcms payload
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.