CVE-1999-0231: Buffer overflow in IP-Switch IMail and Seattle Labs Slmail 2.6 packages using a long VRFY command, c
Buffer overflow in IP-Switch IMail and Seattle Labs Slmail 2.6 packages using a long VRFY command, causing a denial of service and possibly remote access.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0231 is a medium-severity vulnerability identified in the IP-Switch IMail and Seattle Labs Slmail version 2.6 email server packages. The vulnerability arises from a buffer overflow condition triggered by sending an excessively long VRFY command to the mail server. The VRFY command is part of the SMTP protocol used to verify if an email address is valid on the server. In this case, the server does not properly validate or limit the length of the VRFY command input, leading to a buffer overflow. This overflow can cause the server process to crash, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. Additionally, the vulnerability may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code remotely, potentially gaining unauthorized access to the affected system. The CVSS score of 5.0 reflects a medium severity, with the attack vector being network-based, no authentication required, and the primary impact being availability disruption. The vulnerability dates back to 1999, and no patches are available, nor are there known exploits in the wild currently documented. The affected product, Slmail 2.6, is an older mail server software that was more common in the late 1990s and early 2000s. The lack of patches and the age of the software suggest that modern environments are unlikely to be running this version, but legacy systems may still be at risk if not upgraded or replaced.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability is the risk of denial of service on mail servers running the affected Slmail 2.6 software. Disruption of email services can significantly impact business communications, operational continuity, and customer interactions. If the vulnerability is exploited for remote code execution, it could lead to unauthorized access, data breaches, or further network compromise. Given the age of the software, most modern European organizations are unlikely to be affected; however, legacy systems in critical infrastructure, small businesses, or niche environments might still be vulnerable. The impact is heightened in sectors where email availability is critical, such as finance, healthcare, and government services. Additionally, the lack of available patches means organizations must rely on mitigation strategies or system upgrades to reduce risk.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no patches are available for this vulnerability, European organizations should prioritize the following specific mitigation steps: 1) Identify and inventory all mail servers running Slmail 2.6 or IP-Switch IMail to assess exposure. 2) Immediately plan and execute an upgrade or migration to a modern, supported mail server platform that receives regular security updates. 3) If upgrading is not immediately feasible, implement network-level controls such as firewall rules or intrusion prevention systems (IPS) to block or limit VRFY commands or suspicious SMTP traffic from untrusted sources. 4) Employ strict network segmentation to isolate legacy mail servers from critical internal networks to limit potential lateral movement in case of compromise. 5) Monitor mail server logs and network traffic for unusual VRFY command usage or signs of exploitation attempts. 6) Educate IT staff about the risks associated with legacy software and the importance of timely patching or replacement. These targeted actions go beyond generic advice by focusing on legacy system identification, network controls specific to SMTP VRFY commands, and operational monitoring.
Affected Countries
Germany, United Kingdom, France, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Poland
CVE-1999-0231: Buffer overflow in IP-Switch IMail and Seattle Labs Slmail 2.6 packages using a long VRFY command, c
Description
Buffer overflow in IP-Switch IMail and Seattle Labs Slmail 2.6 packages using a long VRFY command, causing a denial of service and possibly remote access.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0231 is a medium-severity vulnerability identified in the IP-Switch IMail and Seattle Labs Slmail version 2.6 email server packages. The vulnerability arises from a buffer overflow condition triggered by sending an excessively long VRFY command to the mail server. The VRFY command is part of the SMTP protocol used to verify if an email address is valid on the server. In this case, the server does not properly validate or limit the length of the VRFY command input, leading to a buffer overflow. This overflow can cause the server process to crash, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. Additionally, the vulnerability may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code remotely, potentially gaining unauthorized access to the affected system. The CVSS score of 5.0 reflects a medium severity, with the attack vector being network-based, no authentication required, and the primary impact being availability disruption. The vulnerability dates back to 1999, and no patches are available, nor are there known exploits in the wild currently documented. The affected product, Slmail 2.6, is an older mail server software that was more common in the late 1990s and early 2000s. The lack of patches and the age of the software suggest that modern environments are unlikely to be running this version, but legacy systems may still be at risk if not upgraded or replaced.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of this vulnerability is the risk of denial of service on mail servers running the affected Slmail 2.6 software. Disruption of email services can significantly impact business communications, operational continuity, and customer interactions. If the vulnerability is exploited for remote code execution, it could lead to unauthorized access, data breaches, or further network compromise. Given the age of the software, most modern European organizations are unlikely to be affected; however, legacy systems in critical infrastructure, small businesses, or niche environments might still be vulnerable. The impact is heightened in sectors where email availability is critical, such as finance, healthcare, and government services. Additionally, the lack of available patches means organizations must rely on mitigation strategies or system upgrades to reduce risk.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no patches are available for this vulnerability, European organizations should prioritize the following specific mitigation steps: 1) Identify and inventory all mail servers running Slmail 2.6 or IP-Switch IMail to assess exposure. 2) Immediately plan and execute an upgrade or migration to a modern, supported mail server platform that receives regular security updates. 3) If upgrading is not immediately feasible, implement network-level controls such as firewall rules or intrusion prevention systems (IPS) to block or limit VRFY commands or suspicious SMTP traffic from untrusted sources. 4) Employ strict network segmentation to isolate legacy mail servers from critical internal networks to limit potential lateral movement in case of compromise. 5) Monitor mail server logs and network traffic for unusual VRFY command usage or signs of exploitation attempts. 6) Educate IT staff about the risks associated with legacy software and the importance of timely patching or replacement. These targeted actions go beyond generic advice by focusing on legacy system identification, network controls specific to SMTP VRFY commands, and operational monitoring.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Threat ID: 682ca32bb6fd31d6ed7debbd
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:39 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 9:11:12 PM
Last updated: 7/30/2025, 9:21:23 PM
Views: 11
Related Threats
CVE-2025-8293: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in Theerawat Patthawee Intl DateTime Calendar
MediumCVE-2025-7686: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in lmyoaoa weichuncai(WP伪春菜)
MediumCVE-2025-7684: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in remysharp Last.fm Recent Album Artwork
MediumCVE-2025-7683: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in janyksteenbeek LatestCheckins
MediumCVE-2025-7668: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in timothyja Linux Promotional Plugin
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.