CVE-1999-0241: Guessable magic cookies in X Windows allows remote attackers to execute commands, e.g. through xterm
Guessable magic cookies in X Windows allows remote attackers to execute commands, e.g. through xterm.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0241 is a critical vulnerability in the X Windows System (specifically in the xfree86_project's x11r6 versions 2.5, 2.5.1, 7.0, and possibly others) that arises from the use of guessable magic cookies for authentication. Magic cookies are secret tokens used by the X Window System to authenticate clients connecting to the X server. If these cookies are predictable or guessable, remote attackers can bypass authentication controls and gain unauthorized access to the X server. This unauthorized access allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands remotely, for example, by launching an xterm session under the attacker's control. The vulnerability is severe because it requires no authentication (Au:N), has network attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), and impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability completely (C:C/I:C/A:C), resulting in a CVSS score of 10. Despite its age (published in 1995), the vulnerability highlights fundamental weaknesses in the authentication mechanism of early X Windows implementations. No patches are available for this vulnerability, and no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, but the potential for remote code execution makes it a significant security risk in environments where vulnerable versions are still in use.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability can be substantial, especially for those relying on legacy systems or older Unix/Linux environments that still use vulnerable versions of the X Windows System. Successful exploitation can lead to full system compromise, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary commands, steal sensitive data, manipulate system configurations, or disrupt services. This can affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability of critical systems. Organizations in sectors such as finance, government, research, and critical infrastructure that use X11-based graphical interfaces for remote management or user access could be particularly at risk. The vulnerability's network-based attack vector means that attackers do not need physical access, increasing the risk of remote exploitation. Given the lack of patches, mitigation relies heavily on system hardening and network controls. The threat is more relevant in environments where legacy software persists, which can be common in certain European institutions with long-lived infrastructure.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no patches are available for CVE-1999-0241, European organizations should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Disable or restrict remote access to X11 servers, especially from untrusted networks, by using firewalls and network segmentation. 2) Use SSH tunneling with X11 forwarding disabled or strictly controlled to prevent unauthorized X server connections. 3) Replace guessable magic cookies with stronger, randomly generated authentication tokens where possible, or migrate to more secure authentication mechanisms such as MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 with proper entropy. 4) Upgrade or migrate systems to modern X server implementations that have addressed this vulnerability or use alternative remote desktop technologies with stronger security. 5) Monitor network traffic for unusual X11 connection attempts and implement intrusion detection systems tuned to detect exploitation attempts. 6) Educate system administrators about the risks of legacy X11 configurations and enforce strict access controls on systems running X Windows.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Poland, Sweden
CVE-1999-0241: Guessable magic cookies in X Windows allows remote attackers to execute commands, e.g. through xterm
Description
Guessable magic cookies in X Windows allows remote attackers to execute commands, e.g. through xterm.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0241 is a critical vulnerability in the X Windows System (specifically in the xfree86_project's x11r6 versions 2.5, 2.5.1, 7.0, and possibly others) that arises from the use of guessable magic cookies for authentication. Magic cookies are secret tokens used by the X Window System to authenticate clients connecting to the X server. If these cookies are predictable or guessable, remote attackers can bypass authentication controls and gain unauthorized access to the X server. This unauthorized access allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands remotely, for example, by launching an xterm session under the attacker's control. The vulnerability is severe because it requires no authentication (Au:N), has network attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), and impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability completely (C:C/I:C/A:C), resulting in a CVSS score of 10. Despite its age (published in 1995), the vulnerability highlights fundamental weaknesses in the authentication mechanism of early X Windows implementations. No patches are available for this vulnerability, and no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, but the potential for remote code execution makes it a significant security risk in environments where vulnerable versions are still in use.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability can be substantial, especially for those relying on legacy systems or older Unix/Linux environments that still use vulnerable versions of the X Windows System. Successful exploitation can lead to full system compromise, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary commands, steal sensitive data, manipulate system configurations, or disrupt services. This can affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability of critical systems. Organizations in sectors such as finance, government, research, and critical infrastructure that use X11-based graphical interfaces for remote management or user access could be particularly at risk. The vulnerability's network-based attack vector means that attackers do not need physical access, increasing the risk of remote exploitation. Given the lack of patches, mitigation relies heavily on system hardening and network controls. The threat is more relevant in environments where legacy software persists, which can be common in certain European institutions with long-lived infrastructure.
Mitigation Recommendations
Since no patches are available for CVE-1999-0241, European organizations should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Disable or restrict remote access to X11 servers, especially from untrusted networks, by using firewalls and network segmentation. 2) Use SSH tunneling with X11 forwarding disabled or strictly controlled to prevent unauthorized X server connections. 3) Replace guessable magic cookies with stronger, randomly generated authentication tokens where possible, or migrate to more secure authentication mechanisms such as MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 with proper entropy. 4) Upgrade or migrate systems to modern X server implementations that have addressed this vulnerability or use alternative remote desktop technologies with stronger security. 5) Monitor network traffic for unusual X11 connection attempts and implement intrusion detection systems tuned to detect exploitation attempts. 6) Educate system administrators about the risks of legacy X11 configurations and enforce strict access controls on systems running X Windows.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Threat ID: 682ca32ab6fd31d6ed7de498
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:38 PM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 3:56:06 PM
Last updated: 7/30/2025, 8:27:43 PM
Views: 9
Related Threats
CVE-2025-7664: CWE-862 Missing Authorization in loword AL Pack
HighCVE-2025-6080: CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management in dasinfomedia WPGYM - Wordpress Gym Management System
HighCVE-2025-6079: CWE-434 Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type in dasinfomedia School Management System for Wordpress
HighCVE-2025-3671: CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in dasinfomedia WPGYM - Wordpress Gym Management System
HighCVE-2025-49895: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in iThemes ServerBuddy by PluginBuddy.com
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.